Failure to Revise Care Plan Leads to Resident Elopement
Summary
The facility failed to revise the care plan for a severely cognitively impaired resident who eloped from the facility. The resident, who had a history of epilepsy and dependence on a wheelchair, was found approximately eight-tenths of a mile from the facility by police after being away for 81 minutes. The resident's care plan, last revised on 11/02/23, did not reflect his inability to go on leave of absence (LOA) unsupervised despite a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Staff interviews confirmed that the resident was no longer allowed to go out unsupervised due to his confusion, but this change was not updated in the care plan until after the elopement incident on 3/31/24. On the day of the incident, an agency LPN opened the door for the resident, mistakenly believing he was going to sit on the front porch. The resident exited the facility at 7:25 PM and was later found by police. The facility's Director of Nursing (DON) and Administrator were notified, and the resident was picked up and returned to the facility. Upon return, the resident was assessed with no injuries noted, and a wander guard bracelet was placed on his wrist. However, the failure to update the care plan in a timely manner directly contributed to the resident's unsupervised exit. Interviews with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and the Social Worker (SW) confirmed that the resident's BIMS score had been below 12 since 2/22/24, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Despite this, the care plan was not updated to reflect the resident's need for supervision during LOA. The SW acknowledged that the care plan should have been revised when the resident's BIMS score fell below 12, but it was not updated until after the elopement incident. The Interim DON also agreed that the care plan should have been updated at the time the resident was determined to be unsafe to go LOA unsupervised.
Removal Plan
- The interim Director of Nursing (DON) and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 conducted a head-to-toe body assessment on Resident #1 to review for any skin abnormalities or concerns. Resident #1 had no negative skin issues or concerns.
- The Interim DON oversaw verification of all residents in facility using census with only one resident out of the facility and currently in the hospital. The census in the facility was 140.
- Staff present in the facility during the time of Resident #1 exit received immediate in-service by the Interim DON and Administrator on the procedures with residents signing out to exit facility to include verification of BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status).
- The Interim DON and Administrator initiated servicing with all staff present on Abuse, Neglect, Resident Rights, Vulnerable Adult, and Wandering. Staff Development will continue In-Servicing. No staff will be allowed to return to work without completing.
- Resident #1 wandering evaluation was reviewed by Interim Director of Nursing and indicated low risk for wandering. Resident #1 wandering evaluation was updated by the Interim DON and Administrator.
- The wander guard bracelet was verified to work properly by checking function with door alarm by Administrator, and then placed on Resident #1's left wrist.
- The facility camera was reviewed by the Administrator to determine the timeline of events leading up to Resident #1 exit of facility.
- The Administrator interviewed staff present of Resident #1 leaving the facility unattended. The agency LPN who held the door open stated that she was not aware he could not leave the facility.
- The Mississippi State Department of Health was notified of Resident #1 elopement.
- The Nurse Practitioner (NP) was notified by the Administrator of Resident #1 elopement and return to facility.
- Licensed nurses were notified to perform acute charting on Resident #1 every shift for the next 72 hours to review resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial needs.
- The LPN #1 initiated facility-based incident reporting on Resident #1.
- The Corporate Clinical Specialist (CCS) initiated an audit of the wander risk evaluations on all 140 active residents. Results indicated twelve (12) residents requiring updates to the wander system. All updates were corrected.
- The Social Services Director updated the wander and elopement binders to ensure all are reflective of results.
- The Maintenance Supervisor checked all wander guards to verify all were in correct working order with no issues found.
- The NP placed orders for Resident to obtain Urinalysis, Comprehensive Metabolic Panel, and Complete Blood Count.
- The Administrator performed an elopement drill to review and educate day shift on policies and procedures on elopement.
- Social Services completed a BIMS on Resident #1 which resulted in moderate cognitive impairment of a 9.
- A Quality Assurance Committee Meeting was held with the Medical Director, Administrator, Assistant Administrator, Interim Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist, and the Assistant Director of Nursing to discuss Resident #1 elopement along with plan of correction.
- Resident #1 was assessed by the NP no issues found and care plan was updated by interdisciplinary team to reflect changes in leave of absence status.
- The Registered Nurse Supervisor #1 performed an elopement drill to review and educate night shift on policies and procedures on elopement.
- The Interim DON and Administrator Assistant performed an elopement Drill and educated staff on day shift.
- The Administrator Assistant developed an orientation binder for all agency staff onboard to be in-serviced on facilities policies and procedures to include wandering, elopement, where to find if a resident is allowed to out leave of absence, and appointment guidelines.
- NP reviewed results of labs ordered and placed an order for Levaquin 750 milligrams one by mouth at bedtime for 7 days related to Urinary Tract Infection to start.
- A current BIMS list will be in the leave of absence binder updated weekly or as needed by Social Services. All residents with BIMS under 12 will not be allowed to leave the facility without supervision.
- The final letter of investigation was sent to the Mississippi State Department of Health.
- The Attorney General was notified regarding the results of the Investigation.
- The Administrator performed an elopement drill to review and educate evening shift on policies and procedures on elopement.
- The Interim DON contacted Resident #2 general surgeon office to confirm phone for communication that is currently in their file and provide the facility contact information for any further communication.
- Resident Council Meeting was held with the Activity Director, Assistant Activity Director #1, Assistant Activity Director #2, and Resident Council President, and eighty-two (82) total resident presents to inform them the facility IJs.
- An in-service was initiated by Staff Development Coordinator on leave of absence process and how to locate residents BIMS. No staff will be allowed to return to work without signing.
- The Administrator held a one-to-one in-service with the Licensed Social Worker on Leave of Absences Care plans to include who can exit facility, supervision needed and process for a change in BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status).
- Medical Director, Administrator, Assistant Administrator, Interim Director of Nursing/ Infection Preventionist, and Assistant Director of Nursing held a Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Meeting to include notification of Immediate Jeopardy to review steps initiated to prevent any further reoccurrence to include audits on elopements, care plans, orientation binder, in-services on appointment process, audits of dialysis residents and contacting dialysis to verify appointments.
- Regional Case Mix conducted in-service with Minimum Data Set (MDS) to include implementation, Reviewing, Revising, and Resolving person-centered care plans.
- An audit was initiated by Social Services Director on leave of absence care plans to ensure resident with impaired cognition receive adequate supervision.
- The Assistant Administrator conducted a one-to-one in-service with Front Desk Receptionist to discuss appointment log, resident leave of absence binder, and how to locate current BIMS for residents.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Failure to Update Care Plans for Comfort Care and Pressure Ulcers: The facility did not revise the care plan for a resident placed on comfort care after a clinic visit showed worsening fluid retention, cough, swelling, and decreased strength; the plan omitted the no-hospitalization order, discontinuation of labs, and guidance for comfort if the resident declined. The facility also failed to update another resident’s care plan after the MDS identified four Stage II pressure ulcers, leaving only general skin-risk interventions instead of wound-specific goals and treatment measures.
Care plans for two residents were not updated to match their current status and care needs. One resident had PTSD and generalized anxiety disorder and was receiving a psychotropic medication, but the care plan listed monitoring for antipsychotic and anticonvulsant meds that were not prescribed and did not include the anxiety diagnosis or related behaviors and interventions. Another resident had new upper and lower dentures, but the oral/dental care plan only noted edentulous status and difficulty chewing, with no mention of dentures or denture-related interventions.
Care plans and related care guides were not updated for a resident with pain, a resident with recurrent falls, and a resident with severe cognitive impairment and transfer needs. One resident’s plan lacked individualized nonpharmacological pain interventions, another resident’s plan omitted a motion sensor that staff were using for fall prevention, and a third resident’s plan and Kardex incorrectly stated the resident was independent with transfers despite staff using a transfer belt and Hoyer lift with two-person assistance.
Failure to revise care plans for two residents left key safety and behavior needs undocumented. One resident with dementia had scissors removed after cutting clothing and hair, but the care plan did not include supervised scissor use. Another resident with a wander guard repeatedly wanted to go outside and attempted to go out on his own, but the care plan did not identify elopement risk or specific interventions for staff. Interviews confirmed staff knew about both residents’ needs, yet the care plans did not reflect those changes.
Failure to update care plan after change in condition: A resident was hospitalized with acute urinary retention and constipation related to neurogenic bowel, but the care plan was not revised to reflect the new diagnosis or related interventions. The MDS Director and MDS Coordinator stated they were unaware of the hospital transfer and acknowledged the care plan should have been updated to support coordinated, individualized care.
A resident with a history of anemia, moderate dementia, and chronic pain had active orders for aspirin for CAD and sertraline (Zoloft) for depression and chronic pain, but the comprehensive care plan was not revised to reflect current diagnoses and medication indications. The care plan continued to reference anemia and daily aspirin for antiplatelet therapy and included a directive to administer antidepressants for chronic pain without specifying sertraline’s use for both depression and chronic pain. An MDS nurse acknowledged that the resident no longer had an active anemia diagnosis and that the care plan should have been updated to clarify the current clinical rationale for aspirin therapy and the indication for sertraline.
Failure to Update Care Plans for Comfort Care and Pressure Ulcers
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to revise the care plan for a resident who was changed to comfort care only after a clinic visit identified worsening fluid retention, weight gain, generalized swelling, decreased strength, occasional shortness of breath, and a persistent cough. The physician ordered that the resident not be hospitalized, that metolazone be stopped, Lasix be increased to 80 mg twice daily, and that labs be discontinued per family request. The current care plan addressed diuretic therapy and a goal for the resident to be free of discomfort, but it did not include the comfort care status, the order not to hospitalize, the discontinuation of lab draws, or instructions for maintaining comfort if the resident’s condition worsened. Nursing notes showed the resident remained in her room in a recliner and was heard coughing continuously, with the cough worsening. Staff administered PRN morphine for chronic cough related to fluid overload, but it was ineffective and the resident reported severe pain and no relief from the cough and discomfort. Additional notes documented continued coughing, shortness of breath, and little relief after cough syrup and morphine were given. The DON acknowledged the care plan should have been revised to identify what staff were to do to provide comfort if the resident’s condition worsened. The facility also failed to revise the care plan for another resident who developed pressure ulcers. The resident’s comprehensive MDS identified four Stage II pressure ulcers, and the CAA directed staff to address the wounds on the care plan with daily treatment, weekly and as-needed monitoring, physician notification for decline or signs of infection, and goals to slow or minimize decline and provide symptom relief or palliative measures. However, the current care plan only identified the resident as at risk for skin integrity impairment and included general measures such as nutrition, moisture control, skin care, and barrier cream use; it did not identify the actual pressure ulcers or include interventions to promote healing or reduce infection or discomfort. The MDS nurse stated she missed revising the care plan to include the pressure ulcers, and the DON stated it was her expectation that a pressure ulcer be identified on the care plan with appropriate goals and interventions.
Care plans did not reflect current diagnoses, medications, or denture status
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that care plans were revised and accurately reflected residents’ current status and care needs for 2 of 21 sampled residents. Resident 6 was admitted with diagnoses including heart failure, respiratory failure, and PTSD, and was able to make needs known. The EHR showed Resident 6 also had generalized anxiety disorder and was receiving a psychotropic medication, but the current care plan dated 05/05/2026 documented monitoring for side effects of antipsychotic and anticonvulsant medications even though Resident 6 was not prescribed those medications. The care plan also identified PTSD but did not include generalized anxiety disorder or behaviors to monitor and interventions related to PTSD or anxiety disorder. Staff F, LPN/CC, stated the care plan did not accurately reflect the resident’s current status or prescribed medications, and Staff B, DNS, stated it did not meet expectations because it did not address the anxiety disorder or target behaviors and interventions. Resident 71 was admitted with diagnoses including PTSD, high blood pressure, and depression and was able to make needs known. Observation on 05/06/2026 showed a denture cup by the sink with the resident’s name on the lid and new upper and lower dentures dated 01/12/26. The resident stated the lower dentures did not fit well and that denture adhesive had been provided, but the dentures still did not fit right and the resident had not told staff yet. The focused oral/dental care plan, initiated on 06/23/2026, identified the resident as edentulous and having difficulty chewing, but did not show that the resident had dentures or include interventions related to denture use or maintenance. Staff E, CNA, stated they had not seen the resident wear dentures and were unaware of the new dentures, Staff C, LPN/CC, stated the care plan should have been updated when the dentures were obtained, and Staff B, DNS, stated the care plan should have reflected the dentures and interventions.
Care plans not updated for pain interventions, fall precautions, and transfer needs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to update care plans and related care guides to reflect current, individualized interventions for three residents. For one resident with quadriplegia related to a spinal injury and ongoing pain, the admission MDS showed intact cognition, scheduled pain medication, and no non-medication pain interventions. The resident stated he had a lot of pain and had been seen by a pain doctor, but the care plan only listed general pain management and comfort measures without identifying the resident’s preferences for nonpharmacological interventions or documenting whether any had been attempted, effective, ineffective, or preferred. The MAR/TAR and progress notes also lacked identification of nonpharmacological pain interventions. For another resident with moderately impaired cognition and a history of multiple falls, the quarterly MDS documented two or more falls with no injury and one fall with nonmajor injury. The care plan included several fall precautions such as frequent safety checks, a low bed, a floor mat, and non-slip footwear, but it did not include the motion sensor with automated auditory reminders that staff were using. Staff observed the resident with the motion sensor in place, and nursing staff stated the device had been used since after a fall in November 2025. The care plan did not identify when the motion sensor should be used or what adverse effects should be monitored. For a third resident with severe cognitive impairment, delusions, behavioral symptoms, and diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbances, anxiety, affective disorder, diabetes, and hearing loss, the care plan and Kardex stated the resident was independent with transfers. However, staff observed the resident being transferred with a transfer belt, requiring assistance from two nursing assistants, and later being moved to and from twin mattresses placed on the floor using a Hoyer lift with two staff. Staff confirmed the resident was not independent with transfers and that the care plan and Kardex had not been revised to reflect the resident’s current transfer ability or the use of the Hoyer lift and mattresses on the floor.
Failure to Revise Care Plans for Safety and Elopement Needs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to revise the care plan for 2 of 12 sampled residents, R15 and R18, after changes in condition and identified needs were documented. The report states the care plan was not updated within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment and was not prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals as required. Review of the records and interviews showed that the existing care plans did not reflect the residents’ current assessed needs and behaviors. For R15, the 4/6/26 quarterly MDS showed severely impaired cognition, with independence in dressing, toileting, and ambulation using a walker, and diagnoses including Alzheimer’s disease, dementia, muscle weakness, hallucinations, anxiety disorder, and long-term pain medication use. On 5/4/26, R15 stated the facility had taken away her scissors and she could no longer use them for knitting, while a bag of yarn and string was observed near her recliner. A 4/15/26 progress note documented housekeeping staff reported R15 had been cutting her clothes and had cut her hair, and social services noted a plan for supervised scissor use. R15’s care plan addressed leisure preferences and one-to-one interactions, but it did not include supervised assistance with scissors for safety reasons. The IDON confirmed R15 had been cutting her clothing and hair, was not safe to use scissors unsupervised, and that the care plan should reflect that need. For R18, the 5/6/26 quarterly MDS showed a BIMS score of 13, indicating cognition intact, with independence in dressing, toileting, and ambulation using a walker, wandering noted during the assessment period, and use of oxygen and multiple medications including antipsychotic, antidepressant, hypnotic, anticonvulsant, pain, and antiplatelet drugs. On 5/4/26, R18 stated he had an alarm on, wanted to go outside, and believed it was illegal that he could not go out by himself; he also said staff told him he needed someone to go outside with him but there was never anyone available. His care plan noted cognition-related needs and a wander guard, but it did not identify elopement risk, a goal, or interventions for what staff should do if he attempted to leave or when he wanted to go outside. The elopement evaluation left the risk for wandering and/or elopement blank, and interviews confirmed staff knew he wanted to go outside, sometimes attempted to go out on his own, and that the care plan lacked detailed interventions.
Failure to Update Care Plan After Hospitalization
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan for Resident #38 to reflect a significant change in condition after the resident was diagnosed in the hospital with acute urinary retention and constipation related to neurogenic bowel. A review of the resident’s hospital record showed this diagnosis on 04/21/2026 at 12:05 AM, but none of the resident’s care plans reflected the new condition or related needs. During an interview on 04/27/2026, Resident #38 stated that episodes of constipation had previously led to urinary retention requiring self-catheterization. On 04/30/2026, the MDS Director and MDS Coordinator stated that care plans were revised after hospitalizations and with changes in condition, but they were not aware the resident had been transferred to the hospital. They acknowledged that the care plan should have been updated to include the resident’s new diagnosis and appropriate interventions and monitoring, and the facility policy stated that care plans are revised as residents’ information and condition change.
Failure to Update Care Plan With Current Diagnoses and Medication Indications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a comprehensive, person-centered care plan was revised to reflect accurate and current information for one resident. The resident was admitted with multiple diagnoses including anemia, moderate dementia, and chronic pain, and had physician orders for aspirin 81 mg daily for CAD and sertraline (Zoloft) 50 mg daily for depression and chronic pain. The comprehensive care plan continued to list a problem statement indicating a history of anemia with a requirement for daily aspirin for antiplatelet therapy, initiated several years earlier, and included a directive for licensed nursing staff to administer antidepressants for chronic pain. However, the care plan was not updated to specify that sertraline was being administered for both depression and chronic pain, and it was not revised to reflect that the resident no longer had an active diagnosis of anemia or to clarify the current clinical rationale for aspirin therapy. During an interview, the MDS nurse acknowledged that the care plan should have been revised to accurately reflect the resident’s current diagnoses and medication indications. This failure created the potential for inaccurate care planning and inconsistent implementation of care, as the written care plan did not align with the resident’s current clinical status and medication orders as identified through record review and staff interview.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release June 24, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
Trusted by long-term care providers and associations.
