Failure to Provide Safe Tracheostomy and Respiratory Care Resulting in Resident Deaths
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide safe and appropriate respiratory and tracheostomy care in accordance with physician orders, professional standards, and resident-specific limitations. For one ventilator-dependent resident with chronic respiratory failure, tracheostomy status, pneumonia, anoxic brain damage, and documented subglottic and proximal tracheal stenosis, hospital records indicated that ENT had changed the trach in the OR and recommended trach changes every three months instead of monthly, and advised against trialing a Passy Muir Valve. A nurse practitioner note directed continued trach care per RT protocol with ENT follow-up for the stenosis. The DON reported seeing a provider note indicating the trach should be changed every three months, but this order was never entered into the medical record. The prior standing order to change the trach every 45 days had been converted to every 30 days by the contracted respiratory company, and then the trach change order dropped off the MAR in January, leaving no active order for trach changes at the time of the resident’s death. On the day of the event, RT documentation earlier in the day described the resident as alert and oriented, on a ventilator with an XLT cuffed, non-fenestrated size 7 trach, with the trach midline, secure, and patent, and no signs of respiratory distress. Later, an RT note documented that the RT performed a trach change because the resident reported the trach was too tight that morning. The RT pre-oxygenated the resident and recorded stable SpO2 and HR before the attempt. During removal and reinsertion of the trach tube, resistance was encountered and insertion was unsuccessful; a smaller trach was then attempted and also could not be inserted. The resident developed acute respiratory distress with pallor and cyanosis, oxygen saturation dropped, and a code blue was initiated. Nursing documentation corroborated that during the attempted trach change, resistance was met twice, the resident became cyanotic with decreasing oxygen saturation, and CPR was initiated after the resident was found unresponsive, apneic, and pulseless. EMS continued resuscitative efforts, and the resident was pronounced dead. Interviews revealed that RT 1 believed the resident’s complaint of tightness meant the trach needed to be changed immediately, pushed a partially dislodged trach back in earlier that morning, and then proceeded with a trach change despite the resident not being in distress and the trach being described as secure, patent, and midline. RT 2 stated he was unaware the trach was not supposed to be changed and had never changed a vented patient’s trach before. RT 3 stated there were instructions that the resident’s trach was not to be changed until seen by ENT, and that he had seen the resident’s name on a whiteboard with an “ENT only” notation. The RT Director stated she had received a verbal order that the trach should be changed only by ENT unless emergent, but this was not entered into the chart and was only communicated verbally and on a whiteboard. A second resident with anoxic brain damage, acute and chronic respiratory failure, tracheostomy status, and pneumonia due to pseudomonas experienced a fatal event related to a broken trach flange and trach displacement. A late-entry RT note documented that during first rounds at night, the RT found the trach tube broken and dislodged from the flange, with the tube about 1.5 inches out of position and deviated from midline. The RT called a nurse and another RT to assist, removed the old tube, and inserted a new Shiley XLT 6 that had been tested and lubricated. During suctioning, a significant amount of blood was observed, and repeated suction passes continued to remove blood. The SpO2 alarm indicated low oxygen saturation, the resident was disconnected from the ventilator for manual bagging, and SpO2 did not improve. A pulse check revealed no pulse, the resident was transferred to the floor, a smaller XLT 5 trach was placed without resistance, and manual ventilation and chest compressions continued until EMS arrived, but the resident could not be revived. A nursing late entry confirmed that the RT showed the nurse the broken trach, that vital signs were stable before the change, and that copious bleeding occurred during the trach change, followed by code blue and unsuccessful resuscitation. RT 4 reported that the trach was broken at the flange and deviated at a 45-degree angle, that the ventilator was not alarming despite the deviation, that the resident’s lips appeared cyanotic with SpO2 below 90%, and that he changed the trach to restore a patent airway. He described large amounts of frank blood and mucus on suctioning and believed the airway was filled with blood. RT 4 also reported concerns about ventilator alarms, pulse oximeters, alarm cables, and lack of needed supplies prior to the current RT Director’s tenure, and stated he had asked repeatedly for alarms, pulse oximeters, and cables. A third resident with quadriplegia, anoxic brain damage, and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and hypercapnia had orders related to BiPAP/ventilator use, including checking body positioning, nasal cannula placement, and BiPAP vent settings with humidity. The overall deficiency cited that staff did not follow physician orders for changing tracheostomies, did not obtain needed consultations with outside providers, did not accurately document resident condition prior to trach changes, and did not initiate hospital transfer when there were concerns about trach integrity. Staff interviews revealed knowledge of faulty trach equipment, including broken flanges that caused trach dislodgement, and that one resident with a broken flange and dislodged trach went into cardiac arrest and died. Additionally, another resident with displaced BiPAP was found unresponsive, CPR was initiated, and the resident could not be resuscitated and died. These failures in respiratory and tracheostomy care for multiple residents resulted in findings of immediate jeopardy for two of the residents.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Surveyors observed four full O2 cylinders on one nursing unit stored unsecured directly on the floor under a sign labeled "FULL CYLINDERS" instead of in a secured storage rack. The ADON confirmed the cylinders were full and should not be on the ground. Reference to NFPA 99 showed that freestanding cylinders must be protected from damage and properly chained or supported in a stand or cart. The DON and Maintenance Director both acknowledged that O2 cylinders are required to be stored in a secure rack, should never be on the floor, and that unsecured cylinders on the floor present a safety risk.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and COPD, receiving oxygen therapy via nasal cannula, was observed twice with the cannula lying on the floor beside the bed instead of stored in the bag on the oxygen concentrator as required. A CNA later picked up the cannula from the floor, wiped it with a non-disinfectant incontinent wipe, and reapplied it to the resident, despite having been trained that a cannula found on the floor should be replaced. An LVN, the DON, and the Administrator all confirmed that oxygen cannulas must be stored properly, replaced if found on the floor, and that incontinent wipes are not disinfectants, indicating a failure to follow the facility’s infection prevention and control policy.
A resident with COPD and dementia, receiving scheduled nebulizer treatments, was found on multiple occasions to have a nebulizer mask stored on top of the machine rather than in a sanitary manner. A CNA and a nurse aide in training confirmed the mask’s placement, and an LPN reported that masks were routinely cleaned, dried, and then stored on top of the machine. The DON later acknowledged that masks should be washed, dried, and placed on a clean surface, and facility policy required oxygen and respiratory supplies to be stored in a plastic bag when not in use.
A resident with acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, pulmonary hypertension, and type 2 diabetes was observed receiving oxygen at 4.5 L/min via nasal cannula without a corresponding physician order in the clinical record. The DON acknowledged that an order should have been in place before oxygen was initiated. Facility policy on supplemental oxygen via nasal cannula requires administration only under a physician or provider order, in alignment with 410 IAC 16.2-3.1-47(a)(6).
A resident was observed receiving O2 via nasal cannula on multiple occasions, but the chart had no current physician order for O2. The resident said she had been told after a recent hospitalization to use O2 for 30 days, but that time had passed and she was still using it because staff told her she needed it. The DON confirmed there was no current O2 order; the last order had already been discontinued.
Failure to provide and document respiratory care: A resident with a trach had no documented evidence of respiratory rate, depth, and quality being monitored each shift and as needed, despite oxygen orders and trach care needs. Other residents with CPAP, nebulizer, and oxygen therapy had respiratory equipment left out of required storage, missing CPAP settings and care details in orders and care plans, and MAR entries signed by nursing staff even when respiratory staff reportedly completed the equipment changes.
Unsecured Storage of Full Oxygen Cylinders on Nursing Unit
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors found that the facility failed to ensure safe storage of oxygen cylinders on the West 1 unit. At 9:03 a.m., four full oxygen cylinders were observed stored unsecured directly on the ground rather than in the designated secured cylinder storage rack, under a sign labeled "FULL CYLINDERS." Photographic evidence was obtained of this condition. At 9:18 a.m., the ADON confirmed that the four cylinders were full and acknowledged they should not be stored on the ground. Review of NFPA 99 (2021) 11.6.2.3(11) indicated that cylinders must be protected from damage and that freestanding cylinders must be properly chained or supported in a proper stand or cart. Later that day, the DON stated that oxygen cylinders should be stored in a secure rack and never directly on the ground, and acknowledged that unsecured cylinders on the floor were a safety risk. The Maintenance Director also confirmed that oxygen cylinders should be in a secure rack and never stored directly on the ground, stating that cylinders stored on the floor can tip over and cause damage. These observations and interviews demonstrated noncompliance with regulatory and NFPA standards for safe storage of oxygen cylinders.
Plan Of Correction
This plan of correction constitutes a written allegation of compliance for the deficiency cited. Submission of this plan of correction is not an admission that the deficiency exists or that one was cited correctly. This plan of correction is submitted to meet the requirements established by the State and Federal law. The four unsecured [R] cylinders on the West 1 unit were secured. The Nursing Department completed a baseline audit of [R] cylinder storage within the facility to ensure all [R] cylinders were secured and stored properly. Ongoing education will be completed with current facility staff regarding the facility's [R] storage policy and procedure; and will be completed during new hire and agency orientation to the facility by ADON/designee. Audits will be completed by the Director of Nursing/designee regarding adherence to the facility's [R] storage policy and procedure twice weekly x 4 weeks, then weekly x 4 weeks, then monthly x 4 months, or until continued substantial compliance has been met. Results of audits will be reported to the QAPI Committee on a monthly basis by the Director of Nursing/designee.
Improper Handling and Storage of Oxygen Nasal Cannula
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to follow its infection prevention and control program related to oxygen therapy equipment for one resident. The resident was an elderly female with dementia, COPD, depression, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia, who had a comprehensive MDS indicating severe cognitive impairment and use of oxygen therapy. Her care plan identified risk for respiratory infections/distress related to COPD with an intervention to administer oxygen as ordered, and physician orders directed oxygen at 2–3 liters via nasal cannula to maintain oxygen saturation above 90% as needed for shortness of breath. On two separate observations, the resident’s nasal cannula was seen lying on the floor beside the bed instead of being stored in the bag on the oxygen concentrator when not in use, as required by facility practice. During interviews, an LVN, a CNA, the DON, and the Administrator all stated that oxygen nasal cannulas should be stored in a bag on the oxygen concentrator when not in use and that if a cannula is found on the floor it should be replaced. The CNA reported that she was unaware the tubing was on the floor until she entered the room to assist with the noon meal, then picked up the nasal cannula, wiped it with an incontinent wipe that did not contain disinfectant, and placed it back on the resident. She acknowledged she had been trained on oxygen tubing storage and should have replaced the cannula. The LVN, DON, and Administrator confirmed that incontinent wipes are for skin use and are not disinfectant wipes, and that staff had been trained on oxygen use and storage. The facility’s Infection Prevention and Control Program policy stated that the program is to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, including instituting measures to avoid complications or dissemination, which was not followed in this instance.
Improper Storage of Nebulizer Mask and Respiratory Supplies
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a deficiency in the sanitary storage of respiratory equipment for one resident receiving respiratory care. The resident was admitted with COPD and unspecified dementia and had care plan focuses for terminal prognosis due to COPD and shortness of breath, with interventions including administration of inhalers and nebulized medications as ordered. Physician orders included scheduled ipratropium-albuterol nebulizer treatments twice daily for COPD. During multiple observations in the resident’s shared room, the nebulizer mask was seen lying on top of the nebulizer machine rather than being stored in a sanitary manner. Staff interviews confirmed the observed storage practice. A CNA and a nurse aide in training each verified that the nebulizer mask was lying on top of the machine at the times of observation. An LPN stated that masks were cleaned after use, dried, and then stored on top of the machine, and acknowledged this could be an infection control issue. During a later observation, the LPN again confirmed the mask was on top of the machine. In an interview, the DON, with the Administrator present, stated the mask should be washed, dried, and placed on a clean surface and acknowledged it could be an infection control issue, and the facility’s written policy specified that oxygen and respiratory supplies were to be stored in a plastic bag when not in use.
Oxygen Administered Without Required Physician Order
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure physician orders were in place for oxygen administration for one resident receiving respiratory care. During an observation on 5/8/26 at 9:45 a.m., Resident 101 was noted to be receiving oxygen at 4.5 liters per minute via nasal cannula. Review of the resident’s clinical record later that day showed diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, pulmonary hypertension, and type 2 diabetes, but no physician’s order for the use of oxygen could be located at the time of review. In a subsequent interview on 5/12/26 at 8:14 a.m., the Director of Nursing stated that physician orders for oxygen should have been present in the record before oxygen was initiated. The facility’s undated policy titled “Supplemental Oxygen Using Nasal Cannula,” provided on 5/13/26, specified that supplemental oxygen may be administered via nasal cannula only at the order of a physician or provider, consistent with 410 IAC 16.2-3.1-47(a)(6). These observations, interviews, and record reviews demonstrate that oxygen was administered to Resident 101 without the required physician order, contrary to both facility policy and state regulatory requirements.
Missing Current Physician Order for Oxygen
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a current physician's order was in place for a resident receiving oxygen via nasal cannula. Resident 3 was observed in her room on multiple occasions using oxygen from a humidifying oxygen delivery machine via nasal cannula. During interview, the resident stated she had been told after her last hospitalization to use oxygen for another 30 days, but that time had passed and she was still wearing the nasal cannula and receiving oxygen because staff told her she needed it; she also stated the nasal cannula bothered her and she did not want to wear it if it was not necessary. Review of the clinical record showed diagnoses including atrial fibrillation and anxiety, but no current oxygen order. The last oxygen order had a start date of 2/2/26 and a discontinued date of 2/23/26. The DON confirmed there was no current physician's order for oxygen for the resident.
Failure to Provide and Document Respiratory Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure appropriate respiratory care was provided and documented for residents with tracheostomy, oxygen, CPAP, and nebulizer needs. Facility policy required respiratory treatments and equipment care to be based on physician orders, care plans, and diagnoses, and required documentation of services provided, including date, time, and the name and title of the person providing care. The respiratory therapy job description stated respiratory staff assumed primary responsibility for respiratory care modalities, conducted therapeutic procedures, maintained resident records, and documented patient care services. Resident R3 had diagnoses including traumatic brain injury and respiratory failure and had a physician order for oxygen at 10 liters per minute continuously, titrated to maintain oxygen saturation above 90%. The resident’s MDS indicated tracheostomy care was required. During observation, R3 was receiving oxygen via face mask to the trach and pulse and oxygen saturation were being monitored. However, review of the clinical record failed to show evidence that the resident’s respiratory rate, depth, and quality were monitored and documented each shift and as needed. Staff interviews confirmed that nurses were responsible for reviewing care plans, monitoring respiratory status, and documenting changes, and that the facility failed to document and monitor R3’s respiratory rate, depth, and quality each shift and as needed. Resident R67 had obstructive sleep apnea, heart failure, and diabetes, with an order for CPAP at hour of sleep at home settings. The order did not include the setting or any care for the CPAP machine, and the care plan also did not include the CPAP settings or care needed for the machine. During observation, the resident’s CPAP mask was sitting on top of the bedside stand and was not stored in a bag as required. Resident R69 had emphysema and was ordered albuterol nebulizer treatments four times a day, but during observation the handheld nebulizer was sitting on top of the machine and not stored in a bag as required. Resident R11 and Resident R32 both had oxygen therapy orders requiring nasal cannula changes every two weeks, but the MAR showed changes documented by nursing staff while interviews confirmed respiratory staff actually performed the changes and that staff signed off even when they had not personally completed the task. The interviews also reflected confusion about who was responsible for the equipment changes and documentation.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release June 24, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
Trusted by long-term care providers and associations.
