Inaccurate Posting of Daily Nurse Staffing Information
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to post accurate daily licensed and unlicensed nurse staffing information for the majority of days reviewed. Surveyors compared the posted “Report of Nursing Staff Directly Responsible” with the daily nursing schedules and Salaried Employee Sheets over a one‑month period and found discrepancies on 28 of 31 days. For multiple dates and shifts, the numbers of RNs, LPNs, and NAs listed on the posted report did not match the actual staffing reflected on the internal schedules and payroll-related records. Examples included days where the posted report showed more NAs or LPNs than were scheduled, days where RNs were listed on the report but were either not scheduled or marked as off on the Salaried Employee Sheet, and days where the posted counts of staff were higher or lower than the daily schedule for all three shifts. The inaccuracy was linked to how the Report of Nursing Staff Directly Responsible was prepared and the lack of understanding of split shifts and 12‑hour shifts by the staff completing the form. The Staff Development Coordinator (SDC) created the master nursing schedule, and the Scheduler generated the daily staffing schedule from it. The Scheduler then emailed the daily schedule to reception staff, who were responsible for completing and posting the report in the lobby. Receptionists reported that they had been trained by the previous Business Office Manager and other reception staff to count each name on the schedule as one staff member for the shift totals. They did not understand that when two names were listed for the same assignment, this represented two staff splitting one shift, not two full staff for the entire shift. As a result, they routinely overcounted staff when shifts were split. Reception staff also reported that they completed and posted the report in the morning and did not update it throughout the day. They stated they did not receive information about call‑outs or schedule changes and therefore did not adjust the posted staffing numbers once the form was initially completed. The Scheduler confirmed that she did not complete the posted report and did not take staff call‑outs or notify reception of changes to the daily staffing schedule. The previous Business Office Manager acknowledged that she had trained reception staff to count each person listed on the schedule as one staff member and was not aware that two people listed for the same assignment could indicate a split shift. The Administrator stated that she had not been reviewing the Report of Nursing Staff Directly Responsible for accuracy prior to its posting, which contributed to the ongoing posting of inaccurate staffing information over the review period. No specific residents, medical histories, or clinical conditions were described in relation to this deficiency. The focus of the findings was on the facility’s processes, documentation, and staff understanding related to the preparation and posting of daily nurse staffing information, and the repeated discrepancies between what was posted for public view and what was actually scheduled and recorded internally.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release June 24, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
Trusted by long-term care providers and associations.



