Heritage Pointe Of Huntington
Inspection history, citations, penalties and survey trends for this long-term care facility in Huntington, Indiana.
- Location
- 1180 West 500 North, Huntington, Indiana 46750
- CMS Provider Number
- 155692
- Inspections on file
- 29
- Latest survey
- March 10, 2026
- Citations (last 12 mo.)
- 15
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Heritage Pointe Of Huntington during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A CNA used a personal cell phone to record a cognitively impaired resident with dementia, depression, anxiety, and behavioral symptoms while the resident was on a toilet seat riser, exposing the resident’s thigh and calf and verbally addressing the resident by first name as he gripped her wrist. The CNA later stated she recorded the video to document the resident’s behavior and showed it to other CNAs and at least one additional person off-site, despite facility policies prohibiting personal device use in care areas and any photography or video of residents. The resident required maximal assistance with toilet transfers and was frequently incontinent, and representatives reported the resident would have been upset and offended by being recorded in the bathroom, supporting the finding of mental abuse and violation of dignity and privacy.
A facility failed to implement transmission-based precautions for a resident with gastroenteritis, leading to an outbreak affecting eight other residents. The resident, diagnosed with Alzheimer's, exhibited symptoms but was not placed in isolation or tested for COVID-19. The infection preventionist and nursing staff were uncertain about the initial case and did not consistently apply contact isolation measures, resulting in the spread of the infection.
A resident's fingernails were observed to be long and dirty despite requests for care, indicating a failure in the facility's grooming assistance. The resident, who required partial assistance, had accepted nail care on several occasions, yet her nails remained unkempt. Staff interviews revealed inconsistencies in nail care responsibilities and frequency, contributing to the deficiency.
A resident with Alzheimer's and dementia experienced multiple falls due to inadequate supervision and incomplete documentation of safety checks. Despite having a care plan with numerous fall interventions, the resident suffered a wrist fracture and other falls, indicating lapses in the facility's adherence to the care plan.
A facility failed to ensure appropriate clinical indications for the use of risperidone, an antipsychotic medication, for a resident with dementia and other mental health conditions. Despite non-pharmacological interventions and a policy requiring adequate indication for psychotropic use, the facility did not justify the continued use of risperidone, leading to a deficiency. Staff interviews revealed inconsistencies in care interventions and documentation, contributing to the issue.
The facility failed to dispose of unlabeled and unused medications in two medication carts. In Medication Cart B, a pill was found in an unlabeled cup, and two pills were loose in the drawer. RN 8 indicated the medication was not administered due to a resident's blood pressure being out of range. In Medication Cart C, a pill was found in an unlabeled cup, and another was loose in the drawer. QMA 16 and the ADON confirmed the medications should be disposed of, as per facility policy.
A resident with dementia and spastic hemiplegia was found unresponsive with a head injury after falling off the toilet. Staff moved the resident multiple times without conducting a proper assessment or notifying a nurse, contrary to facility policy. The resident was later found deceased, and no CPR was initiated due to her DNR status.
Mental Abuse and Privacy Violation Through Unauthorized Video Recording During Toileting
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident from mental abuse when a CNA used a personal cell phone to record a cognitively impaired resident while he was using the restroom and then showed the video to others. The 14‑second video, reviewed by the DON, showed the resident seated on a toilet seat riser with his upper left thigh and bare calf exposed, while he gripped the CNA’s wrist and the CNA verbally responded, “Ow, ow, ow, ow. [NAME], let go of me. Stop.” The resident’s face was not visible, but he was identified by first name in the video, and two CNAs were present during the incident. The CNA later stated she recorded the video to have proof of the resident’s behavior toward her. Other staff confirmed that the CNA had shown them the video, including while off facility grounds and at school, and one staff member reported that another person at their table may also have seen the video. The resident involved had diagnoses including dementia with mood disturbance, major depressive disorder, anxiety, restlessness with agitation, muscle weakness, and unsteadiness on feet, and was receiving buspirone and sertraline. An MDS assessment indicated the resident was cognitively impaired, exhibited physical and verbal behavioral symptoms toward others 1 to 3 days per week, required maximal staff assistance with toilet transfers, and was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. The facility’s policies prohibited use of personal portable electronic devices in resident care areas and strictly prohibited taking photographs or video recordings of residents under any circumstances, and also required all staff to promote and maintain resident dignity and respect resident rights. Despite this, the CNA recorded the resident during toileting and shared the video with multiple individuals, leading to a determination that the resident’s right to be free from mental abuse and to have dignity and privacy maintained was not protected.
Failure to Implement Precautions Leads to Gastroenteritis Outbreak
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement transmission-based precautions to prevent the spread of infectious gastroenteritis among residents. Resident 15, who was diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease, experienced multiple episodes of vomiting and diarrhea but was not placed in transmission-based precautions or tested for COVID-19. This oversight led to the spread of gastroenteritis to eight other residents in the secured unit. The infection preventionist and nursing staff were uncertain about the initial case of gastroenteritis and did not consistently apply contact isolation measures. Residents who exhibited symptoms of nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea were initially tested for COVID-19, and if negative, were later placed in contact isolation. However, this process was not uniformly applied, as evidenced by Resident 15's case, where no precautions were taken despite clear symptoms. The facility's policy on contact precautions for nausea and vomiting was not effectively implemented, contributing to the outbreak. The Director of Nursing and other staff members were unaware of the initial symptoms exhibited by Resident 15, which were not documented in an infection screener. This lack of awareness and documentation led to a delay in implementing necessary precautions, resulting in the spread of gastroenteritis among other residents.
Failure to Provide Adequate Grooming Assistance
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate daily grooming assistance for a resident, specifically in maintaining the cleanliness and appropriate length of her fingernails. During multiple observations, the resident's fingernails were noted to be long with a brown substance underneath, despite her requests for nail care. The resident, who was cognitively intact and required partial assistance for personal hygiene, indicated that staff usually maintained her nails but had been busy recently. The facility's records showed that the resident had accepted complete nail care on several occasions in December, yet her nails remained unkempt. Interviews with various staff members revealed inconsistencies in the responsibility and frequency of nail care. While some staff indicated that nail trimming was part of the shower routine, others mentioned that activities staff handled it weekly. The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) stated that monthly nail checks were conducted, but these did not necessarily include trimming. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that CNAs were responsible for trimming non-diabetic residents' nails on shower days. Despite these procedures, the resident's nails were not adequately maintained, indicating a failure in the facility's grooming assistance protocol.
Failure to Prevent Repeated Falls for a Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent repeated falls for a resident diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease, dementia, hypertension, and anxiety disorder. The resident was moderately cognitively impaired and required varying levels of assistance for daily activities. Despite having numerous fall interventions in place, including non-skid strips, a touch pad call light, and hourly safety checks, the resident experienced multiple falls over a period of time, some resulting in injury. The resident's care plan included specific interventions to prevent falls, such as keeping the walker within reach, using a concave mattress, and conducting hourly safety checks. However, documentation for these safety checks was not completed as ordered, indicating a lapse in the facility's adherence to the care plan. The resident experienced several falls, including one that resulted in a left distal radial fracture, and another where the resident was found on the bathroom floor after attempting to use the toilet. Interviews with staff revealed that while the interventions were known and documented under the task tab in the computer, the actual completion of these tasks was inconsistent. The CNAs generally charted at the end of their shifts, which may have contributed to the lack of timely documentation and supervision. The facility's policy on fall prevention required interventions based on assessments, but the repeated falls suggest that these measures were not effectively implemented or monitored.
Inappropriate Use of Antipsychotic Medication for a Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure appropriate clinical indications for the use of an antipsychotic medication for a resident, leading to a deficiency. The resident, who was diagnosed with various mental health conditions including moderate dementia with mood disturbance and major depressive disorder with psychotic features, was observed to have been prescribed risperidone, an antipsychotic medication. Despite the resident's cognitive intactness as indicated in a recent Minimum Data Set assessment, the facility did not adequately justify the continued use of risperidone, especially given the manufacturer's warning against its use in elderly patients with dementia-related psychosis. The resident's care plans and behavior records indicated a history of anxiety, depression, resistance to care, and potential for physical and verbal aggression. Despite these documented behaviors, the facility's interventions primarily focused on non-pharmacological approaches such as allowing the resident to express feelings, playing calming music, and redirecting to meaningful activities. However, the facility did not effectively implement a gradual dose reduction of the psychotropic medication as recommended, nor did they adequately document clinical indications for the continued use of risperidone. Interviews with staff revealed inconsistencies in understanding and implementing care interventions for the resident. The Social Services Director and nursing staff noted an increase in behaviors and confusion following medication changes, yet the facility failed to provide clear documentation or rationale for the use of risperidone. The facility's policy on psychotropic medications emphasized their use only when adequately indicated, yet this was not adhered to, resulting in the deficiency.
Improper Disposal of Unlabeled Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to properly dispose of unlabeled and unused medications in two of the three medication carts reviewed. During an observation of Medication Cart B, a pill was found in an unlabeled medication cup in the second drawer, and two additional pills were found loose at the bottom of the drawer. RN 8 indicated that the medication had been pulled prior to checking a resident's blood pressure, and since the blood pressure was not within range, the medication was not administered. RN 8 acknowledged that the loose pills should be disposed of. Similarly, during an observation of Medication Cart C, a pill was found in an unlabeled medication cup in the top drawer, and another pill was loose at the bottom of the drawer. QMA 16 noted that the medication had been there for a long time, and the ADON confirmed that the pills should be disposed of. The facility's policy on the destruction of medications requires that all unused, contaminated, or expired prescription drugs be disposed of in accordance with state laws and regulations, and that unused medications should be removed from their storage area and secured until destroyed.
Failure to Report Change in Condition and Complete Assessment After Fall
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure staff reported a resident's change in condition to the nurse before proceeding with care and did not complete a physical assessment after an unwitnessed fall with a head injury for a cognitively impaired and dependent resident. The resident, who had diagnoses including dementia and spastic hemiplegia, was found lying on her left side next to the toilet with a pool of blood running next to her head. Despite being unresponsive and showing signs of severe distress, the staff moved the resident multiple times without conducting a proper assessment or notifying a nurse immediately. The clinical record lacked documentation of vital signs or a head-to-toe assessment after the fall, which is against the facility's policy for handling such incidents. The resident was eventually found to be deceased, and no CPR was initiated due to her DNR status. Interviews with staff revealed that the resident was left unattended on the toilet, and despite showing signs of distress before the fall, the CNAs did not report this to a nurse. The facility's policies clearly state that an assessment should be completed before moving a resident after a fall, and this was not followed in this case. The DON and ADON confirmed that an assessment should have been done and that the resident should not have been moved from the floor without proper evaluation. The facility's failure to adhere to its own policies and procedures contributed to the deficiency identified in this report.
Latest citations in Indiana
Surveyors found that staff failed to follow physician orders for several residents, including not documenting required physician notification and new insulin orders after a critically high blood glucose, not consistently obtaining or recording ordered daily weights, and administering antihypertensive and midodrine medications despite blood pressure readings outside ordered hold parameters. Documentation on the MAR and related records included unexplained "NA," "X," and blank entries for required weights, and cardiac and BP-related medications were given when systolic blood pressure was below or above specified thresholds, contrary to written orders and facility policy.
Informed consent was not documented before a psychotropic med was started for one resident with dementia and anxiety, and it was not documented before another resident's Vraylar dose was increased for aggression. The DON stated the consent form should be completed before initiation or dose increase, and the facility policy required informed consent before starting or increasing a psychotropic med.
A resident with alcohol abuse, anxiety, and major depressive disorder was transferred to the ER and later planned for transfer to another LTC facility, but no Discharge MDS was completed. The MDS coordinator stated the discharge MDS was not done at discharge and should have been completed within the required timeframe; the facility did not have a resident assessment policy and used RAI criteria for timing.
An MDS assessment failed to accurately reflect a resident's status when an antidepressant prescribed for insomnia was not documented on the admission MDS. The resident had Alzheimer's disease and major depressive disorder, and the MDS coordinator later confirmed the assessment was incorrect.
A resident was observed receiving O2 via nasal cannula on multiple occasions, but the chart had no current physician order for O2. The resident said she had been told after a recent hospitalization to use O2 for 30 days, but that time had passed and she was still using it because staff told her she needed it. The DON confirmed there was no current O2 order; the last order had already been discontinued.
A resident with documented diagnoses of CHF, atherosclerotic heart disease, and pacemaker dependence was admitted with clear record entries noting the presence and use of a cardiac pacemaker, including in the admission evaluation, skin assessment, and a physician note. However, the resident’s care plan did not address the pacemaker at all. The MDS Coordinator acknowledged that the pacemaker should have been care planned, noting that while there is no specific MDS item for pacemakers, diagnosis codes or nursing assessments should trigger care plan development. The Unit Manager confirmed that nursing, social services, and the MDS Coordinator can add items to care plans, and the facility’s care plan policy—emphasizing resident-focused, safety-oriented care—was in place but not applied to this resident’s pacemaker.
A resident with acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, pulmonary hypertension, and type 2 diabetes was observed receiving oxygen at 4.5 L/min via nasal cannula without a corresponding physician order in the clinical record. The DON acknowledged that an order should have been in place before oxygen was initiated. Facility policy on supplemental oxygen via nasal cannula requires administration only under a physician or provider order, in alignment with 410 IAC 16.2-3.1-47(a)(6).
A resident was discharged to an acute care hospital, but review of MDS listings showed that no discharge MDS assessment was completed for that resident. The MDS Coordinator acknowledged that a discharge assessment is required whenever a resident leaves the facility and could not explain why it was missed. The Executive Director reported there was no specific facility policy for MDS assessments and that staff relied on the RAI manual for guidance.
A resident with a fractured wrist returned from an orthopedic visit wearing a new black wrist splint after the cast was removed, but the clinical record lacked an updated physician order and instructions for splint use and care. Staff also did not document follow-up with the physician, and the care plan was not revised when the splint began being used; the DON acknowledged the missing order and lack of a policy for obtaining updated physician information.
The facility failed to document assessment and monitoring of a resident’s bruising and post-procedure condition, and failed to follow ordered medication hold parameters for two residents. One resident returned from an outpatient spinal injection with no nursing note or assessment, another had persistent bruising with no documentation, and two residents received Metoprolol and midodrine despite pulse or BP values outside ordered limits. A separate resident was observed with purple discolorations and a black scab, but the skin record did not reflect assessment or monitoring.
Failure to Follow Physician Orders for Insulin, Daily Weights, and BP-Related Medications
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves multiple failures to follow physician orders for medication administration and monitoring. For one resident with type 2 diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, and failure to thrive, a physician’s order directed use of Humalog insulin per a specific sliding scale and required physician notification if blood glucose exceeded 400. A blood sugar of 470 was recorded on one date, and the Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed that 5 units of Humalog were given, but there was no documentation in the MAR, assessment tab, or progress notes that the physician was contacted or that new insulin orders were obtained, despite the DON later stating that an additional 5 units had been ordered. Two residents with orders for daily weights did not have those weights consistently obtained or documented as ordered. One resident with heart failure, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease had a physician’s order for daily weights on dayshift, but on multiple dates in February, March, and April, the MAR/TAR and related documentation showed entries marked as “NA,” “X,” or left blank, with no recorded weights, no physician notification, and no explanation for the missing data. Another resident with hypertension, anxiety disorder, and severe protein-calorie malnutrition also had a daily weight order, yet on numerous dates in April and May, weights were marked “NA” without corresponding weights, physician notification, or explanatory documentation; one weight entry was crossed out and the re-weight was not obtained until the following day. LPNs provided differing explanations for “NA” and “X,” indicating inconsistent understanding of documentation practices. Additional deficiencies occurred in the administration of cardiac and blood pressure–related medications contrary to ordered hold parameters. One resident with hypertension had orders for amlodipine, hydralazine, and losartan potassium, each with instructions to hold the medication if systolic blood pressure (SBP) was less than 110, yet the MAR showed these medications were administered on specific dates when the SBP was below the ordered hold threshold. Another resident with hypertension and systolic and diastolic congestive heart failure had been hospitalized for severe hypotension and returned on midodrine with an order to hold the medication if SBP was greater than 110; however, the MAR showed multiple doses were given on various dates when SBP was outside the ordered hold parameter. These actions were inconsistent with the facility’s own policies requiring medications to be administered only as prescribed and weights to be accurately obtained and documented, and they formed the basis of the cited quality of care deficiency.
Informed Consent Not Documented Before Psychotropic Medication Start or Increase
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure informed consent was obtained and documented before starting or increasing psychotropic medications for 2 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. One resident with diagnoses including dementia with psychotic behaviors and anxiety had Rexulti 1 mg initiated for dementia with agitation, with the medication started the next day, but the Psychoactive Medication Consent and Management Agreement dated after the start lacked documentation from the resident's representative giving consent for the new psychotropic medication. Another resident with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, major depressive disorder, psychotic disorder, and anxiety had Vraylar increased from 1.5 mg to 3 mg for aggression, with the higher dose started the next day. The Psychoactive Medication Consent and Management Agreement was dated after the increase and documented telephone consent on that later date. The DON stated the consent form should be completed prior to initiation or increase of a new psychotropic medication, and the facility policy required informed consent to be obtained and documented before initiation or an increase in dosage, including discussion of risks, benefits, and alternatives.
Discharge MDS Not Completed Timely
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the Discharge MDS assessment was completed within the required timeframe for Resident 108. The resident’s record showed diagnoses of alcohol abuse, anxiety, and major depressive disorder. A progress note dated 12/18/25 at 12:50 a.m. documented that the resident was transferred to the emergency room, and another note dated 12/18/25 at 11:38 a.m. stated the resident would be transferred to another LTC facility upon discharge from the hospital. Review of the resident’s MDS assessments showed that no Discharge MDS assessment had been completed. The RAI 3.0 User’s Manual indicated the Discharge MDS must be completed within 14 calendar days after the discharge date and submitted within 14 days after completion. During interview, the MDS coordinator stated the discharge MDS was not completed at discharge and should have been completed within 14 calendar days of the discharge date; she also stated the facility did not have a resident assessment policy and used the RAI tool criteria for completion timeframes.
Inaccurate MDS Assessment Failed to Document Antidepressant Medication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure an MDS assessment accurately reflected a resident's status for 1 of 32 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy. Resident 23 had diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease and major depressive disorder. Review of the April 2026 MAR showed the resident was prescribed mirtazapine at bedtime on 4/2/26 for insomnia, but the 4/9/26 admission MDS assessment did not document an antidepressant prescription. During interview, the MDS coordinator stated the 4/9/26 MDS assessment was incorrect and should have included the antidepressant medication.
Missing Current Physician Order for Oxygen
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a current physician's order was in place for a resident receiving oxygen via nasal cannula. Resident 3 was observed in her room on multiple occasions using oxygen from a humidifying oxygen delivery machine via nasal cannula. During interview, the resident stated she had been told after her last hospitalization to use oxygen for another 30 days, but that time had passed and she was still wearing the nasal cannula and receiving oxygen because staff told her she needed it; she also stated the nasal cannula bothered her and she did not want to wear it if it was not necessary. Review of the clinical record showed diagnoses including atrial fibrillation and anxiety, but no current oxygen order. The last oxygen order had a start date of 2/2/26 and a discontinued date of 2/23/26. The DON confirmed there was no current physician's order for oxygen for the resident.
Failure to Include Cardiac Pacemaker in Comprehensive Care Plan
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a deficiency in the facility’s failure to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan addressing a resident’s cardiac pacemaker. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including presence of a cardiac pacemaker, congestive heart failure, atherosclerotic heart disease, and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, with documentation indicating pacemaker dependence. An admission skin assessment noted no skin issues other than the pacemaker, and an admission evaluation documented that the resident utilized a cardiac pacemaker device. A physician’s note further confirmed the resident’s pacemaker dependence as part of her medical history. Despite this documented history and device use, the resident’s care plans did not include any interventions or problem statements related to the pacemaker. During interviews, the MDS Coordinator acknowledged that the pacemaker was not included in the care plan and stated it should have been, explaining that although there is no specific MDS item for pacemakers, a diagnosis code or nursing assessment documentation should trigger care plan development. The Unit Manager reported that nursing, social services, and the MDS Coordinator all have the ability to add items to a resident’s care plan. The facility’s Plan of Care policy, provided by the DON, stated that the care plan is to be resident-focused, provide optimal personalized care, and prioritize resident safety, but this was not followed for the resident’s pacemaker.
Oxygen Administered Without Required Physician Order
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure physician orders were in place for oxygen administration for one resident receiving respiratory care. During an observation on 5/8/26 at 9:45 a.m., Resident 101 was noted to be receiving oxygen at 4.5 liters per minute via nasal cannula. Review of the resident’s clinical record later that day showed diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, pulmonary hypertension, and type 2 diabetes, but no physician’s order for the use of oxygen could be located at the time of review. In a subsequent interview on 5/12/26 at 8:14 a.m., the Director of Nursing stated that physician orders for oxygen should have been present in the record before oxygen was initiated. The facility’s undated policy titled “Supplemental Oxygen Using Nasal Cannula,” provided on 5/13/26, specified that supplemental oxygen may be administered via nasal cannula only at the order of a physician or provider, consistent with 410 IAC 16.2-3.1-47(a)(6). These observations, interviews, and record reviews demonstrate that oxygen was administered to Resident 101 without the required physician order, contrary to both facility policy and state regulatory requirements.
Failure to Complete Required Discharge MDS Assessment
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to complete a required discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one resident. Record review showed that Resident 90 was admitted on an unspecified date and discharged on 2/10/26 to an acute care hospital, but the MDS listings contained no completed discharge assessment for this resident. During interview, the MDS Coordinator confirmed that a discharge assessment should be completed whenever a resident is discharged and could provide no reason why this assessment was missed for Resident 90. In a separate interview, the Executive Director stated there was no facility policy regarding MDS assessments and that assessments were completed using the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual. These findings were cited under 410 IAC 3.1-31(d).
Missing Physician Order and Care Plan Update for New Wrist Splint
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure follow-up was obtained for physician orders and instructions after a resident returned from an orthopedic follow-up appointment with a new left wrist splint. The resident had a fractured carpal bone from a fall that occurred while in the facility and was severely cognitively impaired on the admission MDS. After the resident’s cast was removed at the orthopedic visit, the resident returned wearing a black splint with tie string and was to wear it at all times except for bathing, but the clinical record did not contain an updated physician order or associated instructions for the splint. The record also lacked documentation that facility staff contacted the physician to obtain the updated order and instructions, and the care plan was not revised when the splint was first used. During interviews, the Unit Manager and DON acknowledged that the care plan had not been updated until later and that the record lacked a physician order showing the cast had been discontinued and the splint ordered. The DON also stated the facility lacked a policy for obtaining updated physician orders, progress notes, and specific instructions for the facility.
Failure to document assessments and follow medication parameters
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide care according to orders and documented parameters for multiple residents. One resident with diagnoses including stroke, dementia, and osteoarthritis had an outpatient medial branch block at a surgery center, but there were no nursing progress notes documenting the procedure, the time the resident left the facility, the time the resident returned, or any assessment of the bandage or the resident’s condition on return. The Director of Nursing stated there was no documentation or assessment when the resident came back from the outpatient procedure. Another resident was observed with a dark purple bruise to the left antecubital area on multiple observations, but the record contained no documentation of that bruising. The resident’s diagnoses included anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, diabetes, heart failure, high blood pressure, and acute kidney failure. The resident had care plan entries related to bruising and bleeding risk from anticoagulant use and bruising from needle sticks, and weekly skin observations documented no bruises. The DON stated the resident had a blood draw, but there was no documentation regarding the bruise to the left arm. Two residents had medications administered outside ordered parameters. One resident received Metoprolol Tartrate 50 mg twice daily for high blood pressure with instructions to hold if pulse was less than 60, but the MAR showed doses given when the pulse was below 60 on several occasions. Another resident on hospice care received midodrine 5 mg three times daily with instructions to hold if systolic blood pressure was greater than 110, but the MAR showed the medication was administered multiple times when systolic blood pressure exceeded that limit. In addition, a resident was observed with purple discolorations and a black scab on the left forearm, wrist, and hand, but the weekly skin assessment documented no bruising and there was no documentation that the discolorations were assessed or monitored.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release June 24, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
Trusted by long-term care providers and associations.
