Picayune Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center
Inspection history, citations, penalties and survey trends for this long-term care facility in Picayune, Mississippi.
- Location
- 1620 Read Road, Picayune, Mississippi 39466
- CMS Provider Number
- 255141
- Inspections on file
- 16
- Latest survey
- February 5, 2026
- Citations (last 12 mo.)
- 1 (1 serious)
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Picayune Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment, on aspirin and Plavix and ordered for Hoyer lift transfers, fell from bed during ADL care when she pulled herself toward the edge and slipped to the floor. CNAs manually lifted her back to bed without using the mechanical lift and without an LPN or RN present to assess her at the time. Documentation of the fall was delayed and inaccurate, and initial assessment occurred only after bruising was later noted. A hematoma and bruising to the head and shoulder were documented, but neuro checks were not initiated immediately and the provider was not notified when the head injury was first observed. The DON was informed of the fall days later, did not review existing notes documenting the hematoma, and did not physically assess the resident’s head. The provider was eventually notified only of shoulder pain and ordered an X-ray, while the resident continued on antiplatelet therapy until she later developed altered mental status and was transferred to the hospital, where a large subdural hematoma was found.
A resident in an LTC facility was verbally abused by a CNA, who used profanity and threatened the resident with a spray bottle. The incident was not immediately reported to the administration, and the CNA continued to work in the facility for several days. The resident, who has a history of anxiety disorder, felt nervous and afraid. The facility failed to follow its abuse policy, contributing to the deficiency.
A facility failed to report an abuse incident within the required timeframe, involving a CNA who used profanity and aimed a spray bottle at a resident. The incident was witnessed by an LPN but not reported to the State Agency until four days later, delaying protective measures. The DON was informed but did not report it, perceiving it as non-abusive. This delay increased the risk of harm to the resident, leading to Immediate Jeopardy and Substandard Quality of Care findings.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and hemiplegia had their call light out of reach, contrary to facility policy. Staff interviews confirmed the expectation for call lights to be accessible, but this was not followed, leading to a deficiency.
The facility failed to maintain comfortable room temperatures, with several residents consistently complaining about the cold. Observations showed temperatures below the federal requirement, and residents were seen wearing extra clothing and using additional blankets. The maintenance director cited building layout and vent placement as challenges, while staff confirmed frequent complaints and temporary measures like providing extra blankets.
A facility failed to update a resident's care plan to include the use of zinc oxide as per a physician's order. During incontinence care, a CNA applied zinc oxide, but the care plan lacked interventions for its application despite an existing order. Interviews with the DON, Administrator, and an RN confirmed the oversight. The resident, admitted with respiratory failure and hypoxia, required assistance due to incontinence.
A CNA improperly applied medicated cream to a resident, violating facility policy and state regulations that restrict medication administration to licensed nurses. The resident, who required assistance due to incontinence, was cognitively intact and had a history of respiratory failure. The LPN, DON, and Administrator confirmed the breach of protocol.
The facility was found deficient in food storage and dishwashing practices. Observations revealed improperly wrapped and dated food items in the cooler and freezer, and serving bowls with dried food residue. The Dietary Manager confirmed the issues, and the Dietary Aide emphasized the importance of proper cleaning to prevent illness. The Administrator expected compliance with facility policies.
A CNA in an LTC facility failed to maintain proper infection control during perineal care for a resident with dementia, leading to potential cross-contamination. The CNA used contaminated gloves to pull additional wipes from the pack, despite having received prior training. The incident was confirmed by the Risk Manager and DON.
Failure to Ensure Safe Transfer and Timely Post-Fall Assessment After Head Injury
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to protect a resident from neglect by not ensuring safe transfers, timely post-fall assessment, neurological monitoring, and prompt physician notification after a fall with a head injury. The resident had Alzheimer’s disease and a severely impaired cognitive status, with a BIMS score of 3, and physician orders for a Hoyer lift with two staff for transfers. She was also receiving aspirin and Plavix, both antiplatelet medications. On the night in question, while a CNA was providing incontinent care and repositioning the resident onto her side, the resident grabbed the bed or sheet and pulled herself toward the edge, slipping between the bed and the wall and falling to the floor on her right side. Following the fall, the CNAs manually lifted the resident back into bed by her arms and legs without using the ordered mechanical lift and without a licensed nurse present to assess her at the time of the incident. Although CNA staff reported that they notified certain LPNs, those LPNs later denied being informed at the time of the fall. The facility’s incident report and late nursing documentation did not accurately capture the actual date and time of the fall, instead reflecting later dates and omitting the true timing of the event. The incident report also documented that the resident was assessed only after bruising was noted on the right shoulder, and it did not specify when the fall actually occurred. Over the next one to two days, staff identified bruising and a hematoma on the resident’s head and right shoulder, with tenderness and guarded but functional range of motion. Neurological checks were not initiated immediately after the fall, and when a hematoma on the resident’s head was observed by an LPN, the medical provider was not notified at that time because the nurse believed the injury appeared old. The DON was not informed of the fall until two days after it occurred and did not review the earlier nursing notes documenting the hematoma, nor did he physically assess the resident’s head when he did assess her. The medical provider was not informed of the head hematoma and was only notified of the fall days later, at which point he ordered a right shoulder X-ray but no immediate evaluation for the head injury. The resident continued to receive aspirin and Plavix from the time the head injury was first documented until she was later transferred to the hospital for altered mental status, where imaging revealed a large right hemispheric subdural hematoma with midline shift. The facility’s failures in safe transfer technique, immediate licensed nurse assessment, timely neurological monitoring, and prompt physician notification after the fall and head injury were determined to constitute neglect and resulted in serious harm to the resident.
Removal Plan
- The Director of Nursing was notified by a Licensed Practical Nurse regarding discoloration observed on Resident #1's right shoulder.
- A Registered Nurse assessed Resident #1 and obtained an order for a right shoulder X-ray.
- The Director of Nursing contacted a Licensed Practical Nurse to inquire about any knowledge regarding Resident #1's fall.
- The Director of Nursing interviewed a Certified Nurse Assistant regarding Resident #1's fall and obtained a verbal account of the incident.
- The Director of Nursing interviewed a Licensed Practical Nurse regarding Resident #1's fall and obtained a verbal account of the incident.
- A Licensed Practical Nurse initiated a facility-based incident report regarding Resident #1's fall and completed the associated documentation of the event.
- The Director of Nursing reviewed Resident #1's neuro check log to ensure no abnormalities and continued neuro checks to monitor for neurological deficits.
- Nursing staff completed neuro checks for Resident #1 and found no neurological deficits, with the resident remaining at baseline.
- Resident #1 was noted to have drooping to the left side and slurred speech; the Nurse Practitioner was notified and orders were obtained to transfer to the local hospital.
- Resident #1 was transferred to the local hospital.
- The Director of Nursing conducted an audit of all current residents who had an accident or incident in the past thirty days to determine whether any other residents were potentially affected.
- The Director of Nursing provided education to all licensed nurses and Certified Nursing Assistants on fall prevention, safe handling, and proper resident transfers, including neuro checks, change in condition notifications, Abuse and Neglect protocols, Resident Rights, and the Vulnerable Adult Act, with staff required to complete the training before returning to work.
- The Medical Director, Administrator, Director of Nursing, Infection Preventionist, Assistant Director of Nursing, and Corporate Clinical Specialist held an ad hoc QAPI meeting regarding Resident #1's fall, the investigation, the immediate jeopardy, and the corrective action plan; the fall prevention policy was evaluated and reviewed to incorporate updated procedures and training for new staff on adhering to the Interact Care Path for acute mental status changes.
- A Resident Council meeting was held to inform residents that the facility received an Immediate Jeopardy citation due to inadequate lifting techniques and failure to assess a resident after a fall.
- The Administrator, Director of Nursing, and Corporate Clinical Specialist conducted a comprehensive review of the investigation to perform a root cause analysis and identified a failure in communication as the primary issue.
- A Certified Nurse Assistant received individual training on identifying each resident's lifting status per the care plan and safe handling/lifting procedures and received a disciplinary action.
- A Licensed Practical Nurse received a one-to-one inservice on Abuse and Neglect, Resident Rights, the Vulnerable Adults Act, notification of change in condition, fall prevention, and safe patient handling/moving protocols and received a disciplinary action.
- A Certified Nursing Assistant received individual training on identifying each resident's lifting status per the care plan and safe handling/lifting procedures and received a disciplinary action.
- The Director of Nursing conducted a training session for all licensed nursing staff regarding adherence to the Interact Care Path for acute mental status changes following post-fall assessments, with completion mandatory prior to return to work.
Failure to Protect Resident from Verbal Abuse by CNA
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident from verbal abuse by a staff member, specifically a Certified Nursing Aide (CNA). The incident occurred when the CNA used profanity during an argument with the resident and pointed a spray bottle of chemical cleaner toward him. This incident left the resident feeling nervous and afraid. The facility did not immediately remove the CNA from the premises, which placed the resident and others at risk for similar abuse. The incident began when the resident, who had a history of anxiety disorder and was cognitively intact, was involved in a verbal altercation with the CNA. The resident was speaking with a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) in the dining area when the CNA entered. The resident, still upset from a previous disagreement with the CNA, used profanity toward her. The CNA responded by arguing back, using profanity, and threatening the resident with a spray bottle. Despite the escalating situation, the CNA was not removed from duty immediately and continued to work in the facility until the incident was reported to the administration four days later. Interviews with staff revealed that the incident was reported to the Director of Nursing (DON) on the day it occurred, but the DON did not view it as abuse and did not instruct staff to send the CNA home. The CNA continued to work in the facility until the administration was made aware of the incident days later. The facility's failure to follow its abuse policy and protocol, specifically the immediate removal of the CNA, contributed to the deficiency.
Removal Plan
- The Treatment Nurse conducted a routine head-to-toe body assessment on Resident #17 to review for any skin abnormalities or concerns. Resident #17 had no negative skin issues or concerns.
- The Director of Nursing and Administrator interviewed Resident #17 regarding the allegation of abuse. Resident #17 provided statement of events.
- CNA #1 was interviewed, statement obtained and suspended pending investigation by the Administrator. CNA #1 was subsequently terminated.
- An allegation of abuse involving Resident #17 was reported to the State Agency (SA) by the Facility Risk Manager.
- An allegation of abuse involving Resident #17 was submitted to the Attorney General (AG) complaint website by the Risk Manager regarding allegation of abuse.
- Referral was sent to Psychologist Nurse Practitioner by the Director of Nursing for evaluation and follow up.
- The Medical Director was notified of the allegation by the Administrator.
- The Administrator notified ombudsman with no answer and left message.
- The DON conducted Trauma Assessment on Resident #17 with no negative findings.
- The Risk Manager initiated Life satisfaction rounds on residents with BIMS of 12 or higher regarding Abuse and Safety in the facility. Two negative findings on unprofessional behavior resulted with a report of being rude and loud. No allegations of abuse resulted.
- Peer reviews initiated by Risk Manager regarding Abuse and Safety in the facility involving CNA #1. One finding resulted in witnessing the allegation involving Resident #17.
- An Abuse Drill Evaluation completed with Station I and II by the DON and Administrator as part of an ongoing monitoring plan. Life satisfaction rounds with two residents having a BIMS of twelve or higher will be completed by the Administrator/DON or Risk Manager weekly times four weeks, every other week times eight and monthly thereafter for three months. The QAPI committee will evaluate additional action based on results.
- The DON will conduct two random interviews on residents with BIMS of twelve or higher for any allegations of abuse or neglect weekly times four weeks, every other week times eight weeks and monthly times three months thereafter.
- The DON, Assistant Director of Nursing, or Risk Manager will conduct two random body audits on residents with BIMS below twelve for any indicators of abuse or neglect weekly times four weeks, every other week for eight weeks and monthly times three months thereafter. The QAPI committee will evaluate additional action based on results.
- The QAPI Committee will review potential trends and patterns and provide recommendations as needed.
- An in-service initiated by Risk Manager/DON/ADM on Abuse and Neglect, Resident Rights, Vulnerable Adult, along with the reporting guidelines including how to address if abuse is noted. No staff was allowed to return to work prior to completion.
- QAPI Committee held a Quality Assurance Meeting to include Medical Director, Director of Nursing, Assistant Director of Nursing, Risk Manager/Infection Preventionist, Medical Records, Director of Rehabilitation, Office Manager, Activity Director and Minimum Data Set Nurse to discuss allegations of abuse along with corrective action and monitoring in place. Policies were reviewed with no revisions needed.
- State Agency (SA) notified the Administrator of Immediate Jeopardy with past noncompliance. The State Agency (SA) provided the facility with the Immediate Jeopardy templates.
- Facility is alleging that all activities to remove the Immediate Jeopardy were completed and the Immediate Jeopardy was removed.
Failure to Timely Report Abuse Incident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report an allegation of abuse within the required two-hour timeframe for one of the sampled residents. The incident involved a verbal altercation between a resident and a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA), where the CNA used profanity and aimed a spray bottle of chemical cleaner toward the resident. This incident was witnessed by a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) but was not reported to the State Agency until four days later, delaying the facility's ability to protect the resident from further mistreatment. The incident occurred when the CNA entered the dining room and encountered the resident, who began yelling expletives at the CNA. The CNA responded by arguing back with the resident using profanity and picked up a spray bottle, pointing it toward the resident. The LPN present did not take immediate action to remove the CNA from the situation or report the incident to the appropriate authorities in a timely manner. The Director of Nursing (DON) was informed of the incident on the same day but did not report it to the State Agency, as he did not perceive it as an abuse situation based on the information provided by the nurses. The delay in reporting the incident increased the risk of harm to the resident and left them in a situation that was likely to cause serious injury or harm. The facility's failure to ensure immediate reporting of the abuse incident was determined to be Immediate Jeopardy and Substandard Quality of Care. The State Agency notified the facility of these findings and provided an Immediate Jeopardy Template.
Removal Plan
- The Treatment Nurse conducted a routine head-to-toe body assessment on Resident #17 to review for any skin abnormalities or concerns. Resident #17 had no negative skin issues or concerns.
- The Director of Nursing and Administrator interviewed Resident #17 regarding the allegation of abuse. Resident #17 provided statement of events.
- CNA #1 was interviewed, statement obtained and suspended pending investigation by the Administrator. CNA #1 was subsequently terminated.
- An allegation of abuse involving Resident #17 was reported to the State Agency (SA) by the Facility Risk Manager.
- An allegation of abuse involving Resident #17 was submitted to the Attorney General (AG) complaint website by the Risk Manager regarding allegation of abuse.
- Referral was sent to Psychologist Nurse Practitioner by the Director of Nursing for evaluation and follow up.
- The Medical Director was notified of the allegation by the Administrator.
- The Administrator notified ombudsman with no answer and left message.
- The DON conducted Trauma Assessment on Resident #17 with no negative findings.
- The Risk Manager initiated Life satisfaction rounds on residents with BIMS of 12 or higher regarding Abuse and Safety in the facility. Two negative findings on unprofessional behavior resulted with a report of being rude and loud. No allegations of abuse resulted.
- Peer reviews initiated by Risk Manager regarding Abuse and Safety in the facility involving CNA #1. One finding resulted in witnessing the allegation involving Resident #17.
- An Abuse Drill Evaluation completed with Station I and II by the DON and Administrator as part of an ongoing monitoring plan. Life satisfaction rounds with two residents having a BIMS of twelve or higher will be completed by the Administrator/DON or Risk Manager weekly times four weeks, every other week times eight and monthly thereafter for three months. The QAPI committee will evaluate additional action based on results.
- The DON will conduct two random interviews on residents with BIMS of twelve or higher for any allegations of abuse or neglect weekly times four weeks, every other week times eight weeks and monthly times three months thereafter.
- The DON, Assistant Director of Nursing, or Risk Manager will conduct two random body audits on residents with BIMS below twelve for any indicators of abuse or neglect weekly times four weeks, every other week for eight weeks and monthly times three months thereafter. The QAPI committee will evaluate additional action based on results.
- The QAPI Committee will review potential trends and patterns and provide recommendations as needed.
- An in-service initiated by Risk Manager/ DON/ADM on Abuse and Neglect, Resident Rights, Vulnerable Adult, along with the reporting guidelines including how to address if abuse is noted. No staff was allowed to return to work prior to completion.
- QAPI Committee held a Quality Assurance Meeting to include Medical Director, Director of Nursing, Assistant Director of Nursing, Risk Manager/Infection Preventionist, Medical Records, Director of Rehabilitation, Office Manager, Activity Director and Minimum Data Set Nurse to discuss allegations of abuse along with corrective action and monitoring in place. Policies were reviewed with no revisions needed.
- State Agency (SA) notified the Administrator of Immediate Jeopardy with past noncompliance. The State Agency (SA) provided the facility with the Immediate Jeopardy templates.
- Facility is alleging that all activities to remove the Immediate Jeopardy were completed and the Immediate Jeopardy was removed.
Call Light Accessibility Deficiency for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the resident's right to reasonable accommodation by not having a call light within reach for one of the sampled residents. During an observation, the call light for Resident #39 was found draped over a shelf and out of reach. This was confirmed by a CNA who acknowledged the call light was not accessible to the resident. Interviews with facility staff, including an LPN, CNAs, the Administrator, the CNA Supervisor, and the Director of Nursing, revealed that the expectation is for call lights to be left within reach of residents after each visit and for CNAs to make rounds every two hours. Resident #39, who was admitted to the facility in December 2021, has diagnoses including Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side. The resident's cognition was assessed as severely impaired, requiring a staff interview for evaluation. The facility's policy and in-service training emphasize the importance of ensuring call lights are within reach of residents at all times, yet this was not adhered to in the case of Resident #39.
Facility Fails to Maintain Comfortable Room Temperatures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a comfortable and homelike environment for its residents, as evidenced by the uncomfortably cold temperatures in several rooms. Observations and interviews revealed that five residents consistently complained about the cold conditions in their rooms. These residents were often seen wearing extra layers of clothing and using additional blankets to keep warm. The temperatures in their rooms were recorded as being below the federal requirement of 71 degrees Fahrenheit, with some rooms measuring as low as 65 degrees Fahrenheit. The facility's maintenance director acknowledged the difficulty in maintaining consistent temperatures due to the building's layout and vent placement. An igniter malfunction in January 2025 further complicated the situation, taking three days to repair. Staff members, including CNAs and LPNs, confirmed that residents frequently complained about the cold and that extra blankets were provided as a temporary measure. Despite these efforts, the issue persisted, affecting the residents' comfort and well-being. The facility's administrator admitted that while they usually meet the federal temperature requirement, the building's age and traffic patterns contribute to the temperature inconsistencies. The maintenance director attempted to address complaints by adjusting thermostats, but the problem remained unresolved. The deficiency highlights the facility's failure to provide a safe and comfortable environment for its residents, as required by their own policy and federal regulations.
Failure to Update Care Plan with Physician's Order for Zinc Oxide
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan for a resident to include the use of zinc oxide as per a physician's order. The deficiency was identified during an observation of incontinence care, where a CNA applied zinc oxide to the resident's buttocks after providing perineal care. A review of the resident's care plan revealed that it did not include interventions for applying zinc oxide, despite a physician's order dated February 15, 2025, which instructed the application of a zinc barrier cream to the sacrum every day shift. Interviews with the Director of Nursing, the Administrator, and a Registered Nurse confirmed that the care plan was not updated to reflect the physician's order. The Director of Nursing explained that the Care Plan Nurse is responsible for updating the care plan daily by reviewing physician's orders. The resident involved was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and was cognitively intact, requiring assistance for bathing, toileting, and personal hygiene due to bowel and bladder incontinence.
Improper Medication Administration by CNA
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain professional standards of practice when a Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) applied a medicated cream to a resident, which is against the facility's policy and state regulations. During an observation of incontinence care, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) provided a CNA with zinc oxide cream to apply to a resident's sacrum, despite the facility's policy that only registered nurses or licensed practical nurses are permitted to administer medications, including medicated ointments. This action was confirmed by the LPN, the Director of Nursing (DON), and the Administrator, all of whom acknowledged that CNAs are not allowed to administer medications. The resident involved, identified as Resident #22, was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia. The resident was cognitively intact, as indicated by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, and required partial to moderate assistance for personal care due to incontinence. The facility's failure to adhere to its own policies and state regulations regarding medication administration led to this deficiency, as the CNA was improperly directed to apply the medicated cream.
Deficiency in Food Storage and Dishwashing Practices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper food storage and cleanliness of serving bowls, as observed during a survey. In the kitchen's Walk-In Cooler #1, an opened cheesecake box was found without a date indicating when it was opened, and the cheesecake was not fully wrapped or covered. In Freezer #1, an opened container of frozen mixed vegetables and an opened box of beef patties were also not fully wrapped or covered, leaving them exposed. Additionally, serving bowls that were supposed to be washed had dried and stuck-on food residue. The Dietary Manager confirmed that these dishes were washed and stacked by the night shift. The Dietary Aide acknowledged the importance of cleaning and sanitizing plates and dishes to prevent illness among residents. The Administrator stated that her expectation is for kitchen staff to prepare, store, label, and date foods according to facility policy.
Infection Control Breach During Perineal Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain proper infection control practices during perineal care for a resident, leading to potential cross-contamination. During an observation, a CNA, assisted by another CNA, used premoistened wipes to clean the resident's front area and then proceeded to the buttocks area. The CNA, with contaminated gloves, pulled additional wipes from the pack, touching the package with soiled gloves. This action was repeated after the resident had a bowel movement, further contaminating the wipes container. The resident involved was admitted with a diagnosis of unspecified dementia and was cognitively intact, requiring partial to moderate assistance with toileting. The CNA had previously received training and performed a return demonstration on perineal care. Interviews with the CNA, the Risk Manager/Infection Preventionist, and the Director of Nursing confirmed the contamination of the wipes container and acknowledged the potential for infection due to improper handling of the wipes.
Latest citations in Mississippi
A resident with advanced dementia and severe cognitive impairment sustained a bruised left eye and facial bruising after being struck by a CNA. The CNA initially claimed the injury occurred accidentally while pushing the resident to a dining table and denied hitting the resident, but an LPN and another CNA reported that the resident stated she had hit the CNA and was hit back in the eye, demonstrating a slapping motion. Nursing documentation described left orbital ecchymosis, bruising along the bridge of the nose and cheek, tenderness, minimal edema, and the resident’s complaint of soreness, confirming a significant injury resulting from the physical abuse.
The facility failed to protect residents’ right to a dignified and comfortable environment when it did not effectively manage one cognitively impaired resident’s ongoing nighttime yelling, which repeatedly disrupted the sleep of two cognitively intact residents. Staff, including a CNA, the DON, and the Administrator, were aware that this resident, diagnosed with dementia and psychosis, frequently yelled and screamed at night while often sleeping during the day. Progress notes documented nighttime hollering, and interviews confirmed that the disruptive behavior persisted over time, interfering with other residents’ ability to rest.
Surveyors found that the facility failed to protect two residents’ rights to dignity and privacy during routine care. One resident, with moderate cognitive impairment and dependent for toilet hygiene, was observed receiving incontinence care while uncovered, with the room door open and the privacy curtain only partially drawn, allowing visibility into the hallway despite facility policy requiring full privacy. Another resident, dependent for eating and with hemiplegia after a stroke, was assisted with lunch by a CNA who stood over the resident instead of sitting at eye level as required by the facility’s feeding skills checklist. Staff interviews, including with CNAs, an LPN, the DON, and the Administrator, confirmed that existing policies and in-service training directed staff to provide privacy during incontinence care and to sit beside residents when assisting with meals to ensure dignified care.
A resident with epilepsy, skin infection, an upper arm wound, gastrostomy status, and moderate cognitive impairment was observed twice resting in bed with a lunch tray while the call light was not within reach—once on the floor under the bed and once hanging behind the mattress, out of sight. The resident reported being able to use the call light but not knowing where it was. Staff, including CNAs, an LPN, the DON, and the Administrator, stated that call lights are expected to be left within residents’ reach and that training and competencies address this requirement, but there was no specific written policy on call light placement.
A resident with moderate cognitive impairment, dependent for toilet hygiene and with multiple medical conditions, was observed receiving incontinent care in which a CNA removed a urine-soaked brief, changed the bed sheet, and applied a clean brief without performing any required perineal cleansing of the front or back. Facility policy and the peri-care skills checklist specified that male residents must have the perineal area, including the penis, scrotum, and inner thighs, washed, rinsed, and dried during incontinent care. The CNA later acknowledged having been trained and competency-checked on this procedure and knowing cleansing was required. Other staff, including a CNA supervisor, an LPN, the DON, and the Administrator, confirmed that proper incontinent care includes full perineal cleansing in addition to brief changes, establishing that the observed omission did not follow facility policy or professional standards intended to prevent UTIs.
Surveyors found that staff failed to follow infection control practices during PEG tube and wound care. Two residents with PEG tubes had sites with visible brown, crusted or yellowish drainage that had not been cleaned for several days, despite physician orders for daily cleansing and, when indicated, dressings. In another case, a CNA provided peri-care for stool and then assisted with a stage IV sacral pressure ulcer dressing change without changing gloves or performing hand hygiene, contrary to facility policy and staff expectations for aseptic technique.
Surveyors found that the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, and homelike environment when a resident’s room contained odorous soiled linens left on the floor and later placed on furniture with clean clothing, and the bed was made with torn linens exposing the mattress. Other residents reported that housekeeping did not clean under beds, and multiple large dead roaches were repeatedly observed under several beds, with one resident stating he often disposed of dead roaches himself. Residents also reported refusing to use the north shower room due to dirty clothing, feces, and residue on shower chairs and floors; an observation confirmed the presence of soiled clothing, a soiled brief, and unidentified substances on the shower chair and floor, despite staff acknowledging that CNAs were expected to clean and sanitize the shower room after each use.
The facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program, as evidenced by repeated observations of roaches and other insects in multiple resident rooms and common areas. Surveyors found gnats and dead roaches under beds, while several residents reported seeing roaches on ceilings, walls, and floors, including roaches falling onto them at night and having to remove dead roaches themselves. A family member reported bringing her own roach spray due to concerns about roaches in a loved one’s room. During a Resident Council meeting, roaches were seen crawling across the floor, and residents stated that roaches were commonly observed throughout the building. Although the contracted pest control provider reported monthly service focused mainly on entry points and exterior areas and facility staff described processes for reporting pests, the persistent roach activity showed the program was not effectively preventing or controlling pests.
A resident with multiple chronic conditions, who relied on phone contact with a seriously ill significant other, lost access to private communication after her personal cell phone was broken and sent out for repair. Facility policy guarantees residents access to a telephone and private communication, but there was no cordless phone available on the relevant hall, and staff, including the DON, SSD, and Administrator, confirmed there was no convenient method for residents on that hall to make private calls without arranging to use a staff office. This resulted in the resident having no readily available, private telephone option.
A resident with heart failure, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, moderate cognitive impairment, and total dependence on staff for personal and toilet hygiene reported difficulty obtaining assistance with ADLs. Observation revealed the resident had ten long, dirty fingernails extending several millimeters beyond the fingertips with black material underneath, and the resident stated they needed cleaning and cutting. An LPN confirmed the nails were too long and dirty, acknowledged that nursing staff were responsible for daily and weekly fingernail checks and for providing fingernail care as part of ADLs, and noted that such nails could cause skin damage or scratches. The DON and Administrator both confirmed that personal hygiene and grooming are part of ADLs and are expected to be provided for all residents dependent on staff.
Failure to Protect Cognitively Impaired Resident From Physical Abuse by CNA
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to protect a resident from abuse, resulting in the resident being struck in the eye by a CNA. Facility records show that a CNA reported to an LPN that the resident had a bruised left eye and initially stated the injury may have occurred while pushing the resident to the dining table due to the resident’s short, stooped posture. The CNA also reported that the resident used a racial slur toward her and that she verbally responded but denied striking the resident. However, subsequent interviews and the facility’s investigation determined that the resident’s injury was not caused by accidental contact with the dining table. Interviews with staff revealed conflicting accounts that led to the conclusion that the resident had been hit. An LPN stated that the resident reported being hit in the eye by the CNA and that another CNA heard a commotion and later observed bruising to the resident’s left eye. When this second CNA asked what happened, the resident reported that she hit the CNA and was hit back in the eye, while making a motion consistent with a slap. The LPN confirmed that the resident gave a similar account to her, indicating that the CNA had physically struck the resident. The resident involved was admitted to the Memory Care Unit with diagnoses including Alzheimer’s disease, cognitive communication deficit, and unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance, and had a BIMS score of 5 indicating severe cognitive impairment. A nursing progress note documented an acute follow-up assessment of left orbital ecchymosis, describing a dark red circular bruise to the left eye region, dark purple bruising along the lateral bridge of the nose extending to the superior left cheek, tenderness on palpation, minimal edema, and the resident’s complaint that the area was sore. Due to advanced Alzheimer’s disease, the resident was unable to reliably express additional symptoms, but the documented physical findings supported that the resident sustained a significant injury to the eye area as a result of being struck by the CNA.
Failure to Protect Residents’ Right to Rest Due to Unmanaged Nighttime Yelling
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure a dignified and comfortable environment by not effectively addressing ongoing disruptive nighttime behaviors of one resident that interfered with other residents’ ability to rest. Resident #1, admitted with diagnoses including Psychosis and Dementia and a BIMS score of 4 indicating severely impaired cognition, had documented episodes of hollering and yelling during nighttime hours, as noted in progress notes on 3/12/26 and 3/13/26. Interviews with cognitively intact residents, Resident #2 and Resident #3 (both with BIMS scores of 15), revealed that they frequently experienced disrupted sleep due to Resident #1 yelling loudly at night, while the environment was generally quiet during the day. Staff interviews confirmed awareness of the pattern of behavior. CNA #1, who worked both day and night shifts, reported that Resident #1 frequently yelled and screamed at intervals throughout the night and was generally quiet and often slept during the day, with staff assisting the resident out of bed into a geri-chair during both day and nighttime hours. The DON acknowledged the facility was aware of Resident #1’s increased nighttime yelling and extended daytime rest, attributing it to the resident’s Dementia and Psychosis, and stated that interventions such as monitoring, repositioning, offering care, and attempts at redirection had not stopped the behaviors. The Administrator also confirmed awareness of concerns that nighttime noise from Resident #1 affected other residents’ ability to rest. Despite this awareness and ongoing complaints from other residents, the disruptive nighttime yelling continued, resulting in a failure to uphold residents’ rights to a dignified existence and a comfortable environment.
Failure to Ensure Privacy and Dignified Care During Incontinence Care and Feeding
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure residents were treated with dignity and provided privacy during care, as required by resident rights policies and skills checklists. The facility’s Nursing Facility Resident Rights policy guaranteed residents the right to be treated with dignity, courtesy, and respect, and to have privacy during personal care. Facility skills checklists for feeding and peri/incontinent care specified that staff should sit facing residents at eye level when feeding and provide privacy by drawing curtains and closing doors during incontinence care. For Resident #2, surveyors observed a CNA providing incontinent care without closing the resident’s room door and with the privacy curtain only partially drawn. From the surveyor’s position at the bottom right corner of the bed, it was possible to see into the hallway while the resident was uncovered and exposed. Resident #2’s records showed admission with diagnoses including epilepsy, infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, an open wound of the left upper arm, and gastrostomy status. A recent MDS assessment documented a BIMS score of 11, indicating moderate cognitive impairment, and that the resident was dependent for toilet hygiene. The CNA later confirmed awareness that incontinence care required provision of privacy and that she had been trained and competency-checked on this requirement. For Resident #3, surveyors observed a CNA assisting the resident with eating while standing over the resident rather than sitting beside her, contrary to the facility’s feeding skills checklist and training. The DON intervened during the observation and instructed the CNA that staff were to sit next to residents while assisting with eating. The CNA stated she had forgotten to sit beside the resident. Resident #3’s records showed recent admission with diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke), anemia, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting the right dominant side, and a baseline care plan indicating the resident was dependent for eating. Other staff interviews, including with a CNA supervisor, an LPN, the DON, and the Administrator, confirmed that staff were trained at least monthly on residents’ rights, respectful and dignified care, provision of privacy during incontinence care, and the expectation that staff sit beside residents when assisting with eating.
Failure to Maintain Accessible Call Light for a Resident
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure a resident’s call light was maintained within reach as required by the facility’s feeding skills checklist. The skills checklist for feeding a resident specifies that staff must leave the call light within the resident’s reach after feeding. For Resident #2, surveyors observed on two separate occasions that the call light was not accessible. On one observation, the resident was awake in bed with a lunch tray on the overbed table, and the call light was found lying on the floor under the head of the bed. The resident stated he could use his call light but did not know where it was. On a subsequent observation, Resident #2 was again in bed with a lunch tray in front of him, and the call light was hanging behind the mattress at the head of the bed, out of his sight and reach. The resident again stated he could use the call light but did not know where it was. Record review showed the resident had epilepsy, an infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, an open wound of the left upper arm, gastrostomy status, and a BIMS score of 11 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Staff interviews with CNAs, an LPN, the DON, and the Administrator confirmed that call lights were expected to be within residents’ reach and answered timely, and that staff had received in-service training and competency checks on leaving call lights within reach. The Administrator also confirmed there was no specific written policy regarding call light placement.
Failure to Provide Required Perineal Cleansing During Incontinent Care
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide incontinent care in accordance with its own peri-care policy and professional standards of practice for a male resident who was dependent for toilet hygiene. The facility’s written policy for peri/incontinent care for male residents, revised in January 2023, required cleansing of the perineal area starting at the urethra and working outward, including washing and rinsing the penis, scrotum, inner thighs, and perineal area front and back, followed by thorough drying. Record review showed the resident had diagnoses including epilepsy, infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, an open wound of the left upper arm, and gastrostomy status, and a Quarterly MDS with a BIMS score of 11 indicating moderate cognitive impairment, with the resident assessed as dependent for toilet hygiene. On the observed date and time, CNA #1 provided incontinent care to this resident by removing a wet urine-soaked brief, changing the fitted sheet, and applying a clean, dry brief without cleansing the resident’s perineal area, front or back, contrary to facility policy. During a subsequent interview, CNA #1 acknowledged she had received in-service training and competency check-offs on peri-care and knew she was supposed to cleanse the perineal area but did not do so, stating she was nervous. Additional interviews with CNA #2 (CNA supervisor and scheduler), an LPN, the DON, and the Administrator confirmed that staff were trained using the Peri Care–Incontinent Care Skills Checklist and that proper incontinent care includes cleansing the perineal area, front and back, in addition to changing the brief. The failure to perform the required cleansing during incontinent care constituted the cited deficiency related to prevention of urinary tract infections.
Failure to Maintain Infection Control Practices During PEG Tube and Wound Care
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to implement its infection prevention and control program by not maintaining aseptic technique and not providing ordered dressing changes for residents with PEG tubes and a sacral pressure injury. Facility policies on infection control and clean dressing changes required wound care to be provided in a manner that decreases the potential for infection and cross-contamination, including removal of soiled dressings with gloves, discarding gloves, performing hand hygiene, and donning clean gloves before continuing care. The peri-care audit tool also required glove removal, hand hygiene, and re-gloving after peri-care. These standards were not followed during multiple observed care episodes. For one resident with a PEG tube and diagnoses including Alzheimer’s disease, functional quadriplegia, and gastrostomy status, surveyors observed the PEG tube site without a dressing and with a yellowish-brown substance beneath and around the external skin disk extending about one-fourth inch onto surrounding skin. A CNA and an LPN both confirmed there was no dressing in place and acknowledged the drainage at the site. The LPN stated PEG tube site care should be completed daily and as needed for increased drainage and acknowledged that, with no dressing and the amount of drainage present, there was no way to tell when the site was last cleaned. Record review showed a physician order, effective several months prior, for daily cleansing of the PEG tube stoma with normal saline, patting dry, and applying a dry drain dressing to avoid skin breakdown. For another resident with severe protein-calorie malnutrition and gastrostomy status, the PEG tube site was observed with thick brown, crusted substance beneath the external skin disk extending approximately one-half to three-fourths of an inch to the surrounding area. The resident reported the site had not been cleaned in about three days and later stated they might have to clean it themselves. Follow-up observations confirmed the site remained unclean with visible drainage, and an LPN and the DON both confirmed the presence of thick, brown drainage and that the site had not been cleaned in several days, despite an order for daily cleansing with soap and water, rinsing, patting dry, and leaving open to air or applying a dry dressing if drainage was present. In a separate observation involving a resident with a stage IV sacral pressure ulcer and severe cognitive impairment, a CNA provided peri-care for stool soiling, then immediately assisted with wound care using the same gloves worn during peri-care, without performing hand hygiene or changing gloves. The CNA, treatment nurse, DON, and ADON all acknowledged that hand hygiene and glove change should have occurred between peri-care and wound care and that this represented an infection control concern.
Failure to Maintain Clean Resident Rooms and Shower Facilities
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, as required by its Resident Rights & Quality of Life Policy. For one resident, surveyors observed a bag of odorous soiled linens resting on the floor of the room, and the resident’s bed was made with a bedspread that had a football-sized hole exposing the mattress. The resident, who was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 14 and had Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, reported that it was not unusual for bags of soiled linens to be left on the floor and for bedding to be damaged. A CNA confirmed that soiled linens were commonly left in bags on the floor after morning care and that torn bedding should not be used, and later placed the bag of soiled linens on the resident’s furniture where his clean clothing was hanging. The resident remained upset the following day, and a dead roach was observed under his bed near the headboard. Additional deficiencies were identified in other resident rooms. One resident with End Stage Renal Disease and a severely impaired cognition (BIMS score of 5) reported that housekeeping did not clean under the bed; surveyors observed three large dead roaches under the bed, which remained there the following day. When the Housekeeping Supervisor later observed the room, five dead roaches were present under the bed, and he stated the area should not have been in that condition. Another resident, with a diffuse traumatic brain injury and a moderately impaired cognition (BIMS score of 10), reported frequently picking up and disposing of dead roaches himself because staff did not remove them, and a large dead roach was observed under his bed. The facility also failed to maintain a clean and sanitary north shower room. During a Resident Council interview, multiple cognitively intact and moderately impaired residents reported refusing to use the shower room due to cleanliness concerns, including observations of dirty clothing, feces, and residue on shower chairs and floors. A housekeeper stated that while she cleaned the shower rooms multiple times a day, CNAs were responsible for cleaning and sanitizing the shower room after each use and that she had observed occasions when CNAs failed to do so. A subsequent observation of the north shower room revealed soiled clothing, including a soiled brief, on a shower chair, a yellow fluid-like substance on the floor and shower chair, and a white powdery substance on the floor, with no staff present. The Social Services Assistant, DON, and Administrator each acknowledged that staff were expected to clean and sanitize the shower room after each use.
Ongoing Roach Activity Demonstrates Ineffective Pest Control Program
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program as required by its pest control policy dated 9/1/2014, which states the center will maintain an ongoing program to keep the building free of insects and rodents. Surveyors observed multiple instances of roach and insect activity in resident rooms and common areas. In one cognitively intact resident’s room, gnats were seen flying and a dead roach was later found under the bed near the headboard. Another resident’s room contained three large dead roaches under the bed on two consecutive days; this resident reported that roaches were regularly seen in the room, especially at night, crawling on the ceiling and falling onto him and his roommate, and that staff had been notified but he had not seen staff respond to assess or treat the issue. A third resident reported seeing roaches on the ceiling and under the bed and stated he often removed dead roaches himself because staff did not; a large dead roach was observed under his bed. A family member of another resident reported feeling it was necessary to bring her own roach spray due to concerns about roaches in the resident’s room and stated she was told she could not keep the spray in the room, expressing concern that the roach problem needed to be addressed. During a Resident Council meeting, two large roaches were observed crawling across the floor, and residents reported that roaches were commonly seen in rooms and common areas, including on walls, ceilings, and floors, particularly at night. The contracted pest control provider reported he provides monthly services, focusing on different areas each visit, primarily treating entry points and exterior areas, and stated he had not personally observed roaches and received only occasional complaints. Facility leadership, including the housekeeping supervisor, DON, and Maintenance Director, described expectations that staff report pest sightings and that pest control services are available monthly and as needed, but the ongoing presence of roaches and dead insects in resident rooms and common areas demonstrated that the pest control program was not effectively preventing or controlling pests.
Failure to Ensure Resident Access to Private Telephone Communication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a resident’s right to reasonable access to and privacy in the use of a telephone for communication. Facility policy on Resident Rights, revised December 2016, states that residents are guaranteed access to a telephone, mail, and email, and the ability to communicate in person and by mail, email, and telephone with privacy. Resident #1 was admitted on 12/18/24 with diagnoses including Sjogren syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, chronic kidney disease, and morbid obesity. During an interview, the resident reported that she had dropped and broken her personal cellular telephone, which she had used for private communication, and that the facility did not have any telephone that was convenient for her to use privately. She stated that no staff had offered her the use of a staff office or any other mechanism for private communication, and she was upset because she relied on telephone contact with her significant other, who had cancer and was unable to visit. Observations and staff interviews confirmed the lack of accessible, private telephone options for residents on South Hall. An observation on the 100 Hall revealed there was no cordless telephone available for resident use. The DON confirmed that the facility did not have a method to provide residents on South Hall with private communication without first making arrangements or an appointment to use a staff office, and that the cordless telephones in the facility did not have sufficient range to reach South Hall. The SSD confirmed there were no cordless telephones at the South Hall nurses’ station that could be taken to residents’ rooms and acknowledged that Resident #1’s cell phone had been broken and sent out for repair. The Administrator also confirmed that residents on South Hall did not have a method for private communication without prior arrangements and acknowledged that access to private communication is a guaranteed resident right.
Failure to Provide Adequate ADL Assistance for Personal Hygiene
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) to maintain personal hygiene for one resident who was dependent on staff for care. Facility policy on ADLs, revised March 2018, stated that residents unable to carry out ADLs independently would receive services necessary to maintain good grooming and personal and oral hygiene. Record review showed the resident was admitted with heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and hypertension, had a BIMS score of 12 indicating moderate cognitive impairment, was always incontinent of bowel and bladder, and required substantial/maximal assistance for personal hygiene and was dependent for toilet hygiene. A complainant reported that the resident had expressed difficulty getting staff to provide assistance with ADLs. During an observation and interview with the resident, accompanied by an LPN, the resident reported ongoing difficulty obtaining assistance with ADLs. The surveyor observed that the resident had ten long, dirty fingernails protruding 3.0 to 3.5 millimeters past the fingertips, with a black substance beneath all fingernails; the resident stated they needed cleaning and cutting and were too long. The LPN described the fingernails as too long and dirty, confirmed that nursing staff were responsible for checking fingernails daily during care and weekly during body audits, and acknowledged that staff were responsible for providing fingernail care as part of ADLs. The LPN also confirmed that long, dirty, unkempt fingernails had the potential to cause damage or scratches to the resident’s skin. The DON stated she was not aware of any complaints from the resident but confirmed her expectation that ADLs for residents dependent on staff for personal hygiene would be maintained and provided as needed, and that licensed nurses trimmed fingernails for some residents while any nursing staff could clean under fingernails. The Administrator confirmed that personal hygiene and grooming were part of resident ADLs and were expected to be provided for all dependent residents.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release June 24, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
Trusted by long-term care providers and associations.
