Sunplex Sub-acute Center
Inspection history, citations, penalties and survey trends for this long-term care facility in Ocean Springs, Mississippi.
- Location
- 6520 Sunscope Drive, Ocean Springs, Mississippi 39564
- CMS Provider Number
- 255244
- Inspections on file
- 25
- Latest survey
- December 2, 2025
- Citations (last 12 mo.)
- 15 (6 serious)
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Sunplex Sub-acute Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A CNA took a resident's debit card without permission and used it for unauthorized purchases at several locations, including liquor stores and a hotel. The resident, who was cognitively intact, was notified by her bank of suspicious activity, leading to an investigation that confirmed the CNA's involvement. The incident was reported to law enforcement, and the resident was reimbursed by her bank.
The facility did not use its QAPI program to identify or correct failures in infection prevention, outbreak response, and staffing during a flu outbreak, resulting in missed medications, lack of outbreak recognition, failure to implement droplet precautions, and inadequate nurse coverage. The incident was not reviewed in QAPI meetings, and no changes were made to policies, procedures, or the facility assessment following the event.
The facility did not specify required nurse and CNA staffing by shift and unit in its assessment, nor did it maintain an actionable contingency plan for staffing emergencies. During an influenza outbreak, only one nurse was left to care for 58 residents overnight, leading to missed medications and inadequate monitoring. The facility did not recognize the outbreak, implement infection control measures, or use its QAPI program to address these failures.
During an influenza outbreak, the facility did not identify the outbreak, failed to initiate droplet precautions, and did not post required signage or notify the local health department. Staff and families were not educated about the outbreak, and the Infection Preventionist and clinical leadership did not verify isolation orders or monitor infection-control compliance. Antiviral medications were not administered as prescribed, and Enhanced Barrier Precautions were not followed during high-contact care activities. These failures led to continued exposure and potential transmission of influenza among all residents.
During a period of increased resident illness due to an influenza outbreak, the facility failed to ensure adequate licensed nurse coverage, resulting in only one RN being responsible for all residents overnight. This led to multiple residents missing scheduled medications, including pain medications and IV antibiotics, and physicians were not notified of these omissions. The facility also did not implement appropriate infection control measures or maintain outbreak surveillance, and staff lacked clear direction regarding coverage responsibilities.
During an influenza outbreak, the facility failed to provide adequate licensed nurse and CNA coverage, resulting in missed medications and lack of resident monitoring when only one RN was responsible for all residents overnight. Several residents missed scheduled showers and baths due to insufficient CNA staffing, and both staff and residents reported ongoing issues with staffing shortages. The facility's policies and contingency planning were inadequate to address staffing emergencies, and the Medical Director was not informed of the situation.
Surveyors observed expired bread, thickened milk, and peanut butter pudding, as well as spoiled bell peppers and improperly stored teriyaki sauce. The dietary head confirmed staff were responsible for monitoring expiration dates and storage requirements, while the Administrator stated that staff are expected to routinely check and follow procedures.
A resident with diabetes and intact cognition was left with visibly soiled bed linens for several days, including blood stains from weeping and bleeding legs. Despite staff awareness and facility policy requiring clean linens at least every other day and as needed, the linens were not changed, and clean linens were left unused in the room.
The facility did not develop a care plan for a resident with an indwelling catheter and failed to implement scheduled bathing interventions for two residents, resulting in multiple missed showers and baths. Staff and administration were aware of these issues, which were attributed in part to CNA staffing challenges.
An LPN did not administer prescribed Icar-C and Cyanocobalamin tablets to a resident with chronic kidney disease and moderate cognitive impairment because the medications were not available. The LPN marked the medications as 'on order' in the eMAR but did not notify the physician or attempt to obtain the medications from another pharmacy, contrary to facility policy. Interviews with staff confirmed the required notifications and actions were not taken.
Three residents who required staff assistance for ADLs did not receive scheduled baths or showers as documented, with only one bath recorded for one resident in a month and multiple missed showers for others. Residents and family members reported infrequent bathing and unaddressed preferences, while staff and leadership cited ongoing CNA staffing shortages as the main cause for the missed care and incomplete documentation.
A resident with chronic bronchitis and asthma was found to have an inhaler stored at the bedside without an assessment for safe self-administration or a physician's order authorizing bedside storage. The resident, who was cognitively intact, used the inhaler as needed without notifying staff, and facility staff were unaware of the medication's presence in the room. Facility policy required both an assessment and an order for self-administration, neither of which had been completed.
A resident with heart failure had multiple inaccurate weights entered into the medical record by different LPNs, resulting in significant discrepancies and incorrect weight alerts in the system. The errors were confirmed by the DON and an RN, and the facility's review process did not prevent or promptly identify these documentation mistakes.
The QAPI Committee failed to sustain corrective actions for previously cited food storage and sanitation deficiencies, resulting in expired and spoiled food not being discarded and improper refrigeration of items. Despite monthly QAPI meetings and existing policies, surveyors observed repeated noncompliance during kitchen inspections, confirming ongoing issues with safe and sanitary food handling.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and identified as an elopement risk was able to exit the facility by following a dietary aide out the front door. The aide, mistaking the resident for a visitor due to her appearance, allowed her to leave. The resident remained outside for about 35 minutes before being found and escorted back inside without injury. The incident occurred despite the resident wearing an elopement-risk bracelet and being listed in the facility's wander book.
A resident fell from the bed during a bed bath, resulting in bilateral femoral fractures. The CNA providing care was unable to prevent the fall as the resident became slippery and rolled out of bed while holding onto the side rail. The facility's policy on accident prevention was not effectively implemented, leading to the incident being ruled as accidental.
A facility's QAPI program failed to prevent a resident from sustaining bilateral fractures after a CNA's attempt to provide care resulted in the resident rolling out of bed. This incident followed a previous citation for improper positioning leading to injury, indicating ineffective systemic corrective actions.
A resident with paraplegia fell out of bed due to inadequate supervision and improper positioning by two CNAs. While one CNA left the room, the other attempted to reposition the resident, resulting in the resident sliding out of bed and sustaining injuries. The facility's investigation ruled the fall accidental, despite the resident's report of feeling pushed.
A facility failed to serve food at an appetizing temperature, affecting a resident and potentially all residents. The steam table was partially inoperable, and trays were not covered during preparation, leading to cold meals. Despite complaints, the issue persisted for months. A cognitively intact resident with osteoarthritis and hypertension was among those affected.
The facility failed to maintain food safety and hygiene in the kitchen, with observations of spoiled bell peppers, exposed seasonings, and improper handling of a glove picked up from the floor. The cook and Dietary Manager acknowledged their responsibility for maintaining food quality, while the Administrator emphasized the expectation for proper storage and disposal.
The facility submitted inaccurate staffing data to CMS for the second quarter of 2024 due to coding errors in their Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) system. Staff working multiple roles were not correctly coded, leading to reports of low weekend staffing and a one-star rating. The issue was identified through staff interviews and data review, with the Administrator acknowledging the problem and the need for manual coding adjustments.
The facility failed to resolve a grievance about cold food reported by residents over several months. Despite initial attempts to address the issue by speeding up tray delivery, the problem persisted due to a malfunctioning steam table. The Dietary Manager and Maintenance Director were aware of the issue, but repairs were delayed due to dry-rotted components and lack of follow-up. The current Administrator was not informed until recently, highlighting a breakdown in communication and timely resolution.
The facility failed to serve meals simultaneously to residents seated at the same table, affecting three residents who experienced delays in receiving their lunch. Despite being cognitively intact and having specific medical conditions, these residents expressed dissatisfaction with the timing of their meal service. Staff acknowledged the issue, recognizing it as a concern for resident dignity.
The facility failed to honor residents' requests for alternative meals, specifically hamburgers and fries, despite these options being listed on the alternative menu. Two residents reported being denied these meals, with staff citing budget concerns and previous overconsumption as reasons. The facility's policy on resident rights and menu alternatives was not followed, and the change in menu options was not communicated to the residents. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of awareness and communication regarding the residents' dissatisfaction with the menu.
A medication cart was found unlocked and unattended in a hallway, containing unsecured pills and a needle. The cart had been left by an LPN due to a broken lock, and the night shift failed to remove the medications. The DON and Administrator expected the cart to be secured and removed from the facility.
A significant medication error occurred when an LPN applied a new Duragesic (fentanyl) patch to a resident without removing the old one, resulting in the resident having two patches on when arriving at the emergency department. The facility's policy requires the removal of the old patch before applying a new one, but the LPN could not find the old patch and assumed it had been removed by the previous shift.
CNA Misappropriation of Resident Property
Penalty
Summary
A Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) removed a resident's debit card from her purse without permission and used it at multiple locations for unauthorized purchases. The resident, who was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 and had a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with acute exacerbation, reported that her card was used at liquor stores, gift shops, and a hotel. The CNA was identified through interviews and confirmation from a local hotel registry, as well as his own admission to using the card for various purchases including gas, liquor, food, and a hotel room. The incident was discovered after the resident's bank notified her of suspicious activity, and the facility's administrator was informed of the missing card and unauthorized charges. The facility's abuse and neglect policy defines misappropriation of resident property as the wrongful use of a resident's belongings or money without consent. The CNA provided conflicting accounts during interviews but ultimately admitted to using the resident's card. The incident was reported to local law enforcement, the State Agency, and the Attorney General's Office. The resident pressed charges, and the bank reimbursed her for the stolen funds. The facility did not have video surveillance to further support the investigation.
Failure to Use QAPI to Address Infection Control and Staffing During Influenza Outbreak
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to utilize its Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program to identify, analyze, and correct systemic failures in infection prevention and control, as well as staffing, during an influenza outbreak affecting all 59 residents. The outbreak occurred over several days, during which the facility did not recognize the outbreak, did not initiate droplet precautions, failed to notify the local health department, and did not ensure that antiviral medications were administered as prescribed. There was also a lack of monitoring for staff illness and compliance with infection control measures, resulting in continued exposure and spread of influenza within the facility. Staff interviews and record reviews revealed that the QAPI Committee did not meet during or after the outbreak, and the incident was not discussed in any quality review process. The Medical Director was not fully informed about the number of affected residents, the implementation of infection control measures, or staffing shortages. The Infection Preventionist was not aware of the specific infection control measures implemented, did not maintain illness logs, and was unfamiliar with the facility's infection control policies. The Administrator and DON did not consider the outbreak an emergency, did not update the facility assessment or contingency plan, and did not verify the implementation of appropriate precautions or notification procedures. No internal investigation was conducted regarding missed medications, and the pharmacy and state agency were not notified. During the outbreak, there was insufficient licensed nurse coverage, with only one nurse responsible for 58 residents overnight, leading to missed medications and inadequate monitoring. The facility assessment lacked required details on staffing needs by shift and unit, and the contingency plan for staffing emergencies was not actionable. The Administrator and DON described the incident as isolated and made no changes to policies or procedures as a result. The QAPI process was not used to review or address the deficiencies in infection control or staffing, and no lessons were identified or learned from the incident.
Removal Plan
- The Administrator held an emergency Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting with the Medical Director, Director of Nursing, Infection Preventionist, Medical Records nurse, Life Connections Coordinator, Wound Care nurse and others as part of the Interdisciplinary team to discuss findings from the State Agency, discuss immediate actions, and further interventions. Immediate actions were decided as in-servicing all staff on Abuse and Neglect, in-servicing nurses on medication administration and medication errors, in-servicing all staff on flu outbreak and isolation precautions. The Administrator would review policy for Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement for any changes needed and as re-education in policy. The Administrator would review and update facility assessment to identify updated needs to staff per unit and the contingency plan for emergencies. Administrative nurses would complete a 100 percent audit on all medication carts compared to medication orders to ensure all medications were accessible in the building. The Infection Preventionist would be in-serviced on the roles and responsibilities of an Infection Preventionist. Policies on Abuse and Neglect, medication administration, medication errors, QAPI, flu outbreak, isolation precautions, and the expectations of the Infection Preventionist were all reviewed and updated. Staff were in-serviced with new policies.
- The Administrator notified Medical Director of missed medications during QAPI meeting. All missed medications were reviewed with Medical Director during this meeting. No new orders were given. No adverse reactions were noted due to missed medications.
- The Director of Nursing began an in-service for all staff on the policies and procedures of Abuse and Neglect. No employee was permitted to return to work until they completed the in-service.
- The Director of Nursing began an in-service on medication administration and medication errors to educate all nursing staff. This in-service included procedures for when medication cannot be located anywhere in the facility. If medication is not available, staff should contact pharmacy and pull medication from emergency kit. Any missed medications are to be reported to the Director of Nursing and Medical Director immediately, an incident report is to be completed, the resident observed for any adverse reactions, and the family/resident representative is to be notified. Any tasks left undone are to be reported to relief during report for oncoming shift. No employee was permitted to return to work until they completed the in-service.
- Administrator and Director of Nursing reviewed Flu outbreak and Isolation precautions policy and procedures. The Director of Nursing began an inservice for flu outbreak and isolation precautions to educate all staff. All staff are to continue to monitor residents and staff for flu-like symptoms and report any findings to the immediate supervisor. No employee was permitted to return to work until they completed the in-service.
- The Administrator reviewed policy on Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement plan and policy for re-education purposes and to review new policy. The Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement plan and policy was reviewed with the facility's Interdisciplinary Team including the Administrator, Medical Director, Director of Nursing, Infection Preventionist, Medical Records nurse, Life Connections Coordinator, Wound Care nurse and others in a follow up Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting.
- The facility Administrator began reviewing and updating the facility assessment to reflect correct staffing and supervision by shift and by unit related to the facility's acuity level. The Facility Administrator began updating the contingency plan for staffing emergencies within the facility assessment. The contingency plan will be initiated and is as follows: Facility will utilize On-call for staffing needs and call ins. On-call will notify Director of Nursing if not able to cover. Facility will utilize Consultants and/or transfer staff from other nursing facilities within partnership to assist and cover staffing needs. The new facility assessment was reviewed with the interdisciplinary team during follow up QAPI.
- The Infection Preventionist (IP) was included in an in-service held by the Director of Nursing for policy and procedures of outbreak surveillance and staff-illness tracking during an outbreak to be completed before beginning of their next shift. Due to this outbreak being finished, IP nurse was instructed to continue to monitor residents and staff for flu-like symptoms and to report to Director of Nursing any findings.
- The Director of Nursing, Medical Records nurse, and Wound Care nurse completed a 100 percent audit to compare the current medication orders to the medication on the carts and in medication rooms to verify all medications ordered were readily available in the facility. No negative findings during audit.
- The Administrator notified the Mississippi Department of Health of the flu outbreak.
- The Administrator held a follow-up QAPI meeting to discuss all immediate actions that were in place. All in-services and audits were completed. All staff would continue to monitor any residents or staff for flu-like symptoms, staffing would be reviewed daily to ensure all areas were covered according to the facility assessment, and daily reviews of missed medications would be reviewed each morning in clinical meeting.
Failure to Maintain Adequate Staffing Assessment and Contingency Plan During Influenza Outbreak
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure its facility-wide assessment contained the required details regarding staffing needs by shift and by unit, and did not maintain an actionable contingency plan for staffing emergencies. The assessment only included hours per resident day (HPRD) rather than specifying the number of licensed nurses and CNAs needed per shift and per unit. During an influenza outbreak, the facility did not update the assessment or contingency plan to address the increased risk and staffing needs, and administrative staff were used to assist with care when a nurse called in sick, but no agency staff were used and no formal process was in place to secure additional coverage. On the night in question, only one nurse was responsible for 58 residents from midnight until 7 AM, resulting in missed medications and inadequate monitoring for residents on one unit. The administrator and DON were aware of the staffing shortage and attempted to contact other nurses, including those at sister facilities, but were unable to secure additional coverage. The administrator assisted at the nursing station, but the facility's contingency plan did not provide clear procedures for securing coverage during emergencies or staff call-offs, and no updates were made to the plan following the incident. The facility did not identify the influenza outbreak when three residents tested positive, did not initiate droplet precautions, notify the health department, provide timely antiviral treatment, or maintain outbreak surveillance and staff illness tracking. The facility also failed to use its QAPI program to identify and correct system failures in infection control and staffing during the outbreak. These failures resulted in the facility being unprepared for staff absences during the influenza outbreak, placing all residents at risk for serious illness, harm, impairment, or death.
Removal Plan
- The Administrator held an emergency Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) meeting with the Medical Director, Director of Nursing, Infection Preventionist, Medical Records nurse, Life Connections Coordinator, Wound Care nurse, and others as part of the Interdisciplinary team to discuss findings from the State Agency, discuss immediate actions, and further interventions. Immediate actions were decided as in-servicing all staff on Abuse and Neglect, in-servicing nurses on medication administration and medication errors, in-servicing all staff on flu outbreak and isolation precautions. The Administrator would review policy for QAPI for any changes needed and as re-education in policy.
- The Administrator would review and update facility assessment to identify updated needs to staff per unit and the contingency plan for emergencies.
- Administrative nurses would complete a 100 percent audit on all medication carts compared to medication orders to ensure all medications were accessible in the building.
- The Infection Preventionist would be in-serviced on the roles and responsibilities of an Infection Preventionist.
- Policies on Abuse and Neglect, medication administration, medication errors, QAPI, flu outbreak, isolation precautions, and the expectations of the Infection Preventionist were all reviewed and updated. Staff were in-serviced with new policies.
- The Administrator notified Medical Director of missed medications during QAPI meeting. All missed medications were reviewed with Medical Director during this meeting. No new orders were given. No adverse reactions were noted due to missed medications.
- The Director of Nursing began an in-service for all staff on the policies and procedures of Abuse and Neglect. No employee was permitted to return to work until they completed the in-service.
- The Director of Nursing began an in-service on medication administration and medication errors to educate all nursing staff. This in-service included procedures for when medication cannot be located anywhere in the facility. If medication is not available, staff should contact pharmacy and pull medication from emergency kit. Any missed medications are to be reported to the Director of Nursing and Medical Director immediately, an incident report is to be completed, the resident observed for any adverse reactions, and the family/resident representative is to be notified. Any tasks left undone are to be reported to relief during report for oncoming shift. No employee was permitted to return to work until they completed the in-service.
- Administrator and Director of Nursing reviewed Flu outbreak and Isolation precautions policy and procedures. The Director of Nursing began an in-service for flu outbreak and isolation precautions to educate all staff. All staff are to continue to monitor residents and staff for flu-like symptoms and report any findings to the immediate supervisor. No employee was permitted to return to work until they completed the in-service.
- The Administrator reviewed policy on QAPI plan and policy for re-education purposes and to review new policy. The QAPI plan and policy was reviewed with the facility's Interdisciplinary Team including the Administrator, Medical Director, Director of Nursing, Infection Preventionist, Medical Records nurse, Life Connections Coordinator, Wound Care nurse and others in a follow up QAPI meeting.
- The facility Administrator began reviewing and updating the facility assessment to reflect correct staffing and supervision by shift and by unit related to the facility's acuity level. The Facility Administrator began updating the contingency plan for staffing emergencies within the facility assessment. The contingency plan will be initiated and is as follows: Facility will utilize On-call for staffing needs and call ins. On-call will notify Director of Nursing if not able to cover. Facility will utilize Consultants and/or transfer staff from other nursing facilities within partnership to assist and cover staffing needs. The new facility assessment was reviewed with the interdisciplinary team during follow up QAPI.
- The Infection Preventionist (IP) was included in an in-service held by the Director of Nursing for policy and procedures of outbreak surveillance and staff-illness tracking during an outbreak to be completed before beginning of their next shift. Due to this outbreak being finished, IP nurse was instructed to continue to monitor residents and staff for flu-like symptoms and to report to Director of Nursing any findings.
- The Director of Nursing, Medical Records nurse, and Wound Care nurse completed a 100 percent audit to compare the current medication orders to the medication on the carts and in medication rooms to verify all medications ordered were readily available in the facility. No negative findings during audit.
- The Administrator notified the Mississippi Department of Health of the flu outbreak.
- The Administrator held a follow-up QAPI meeting to discuss all immediate actions that were in place. All in-services and audits were completed. All staff would continue to monitor any residents or staff for flu-like symptoms, staffing would be reviewed daily to ensure all areas were covered according to the facility assessment, and daily reviews of missed medications would be reviewed each morning in clinical meeting.
Failure to Implement Infection Control Measures During Influenza Outbreak
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement appropriate infection prevention and control practices to prevent and contain the spread of influenza when three residents tested positive for influenza within a short period, affecting all 59 residents in the facility. The facility did not identify the presence of an outbreak, did not initiate droplet precautions, and failed to post appropriate signage or notify the local health department as required by policy and CDC guidance. Staff and family education regarding the outbreak was not provided, and the Infection Preventionist and clinical leadership did not verify isolation orders or monitor staff illness and infection-control compliance. Additionally, antiviral medications were not administered as prescribed, resulting in continued exposure and potential transmission of influenza throughout the facility. Specific failures included not implementing daily active surveillance for influenza illness among residents, healthcare personnel, and visitors after the first laboratory-confirmed case. Visual alerts and signage about respiratory hygiene and cough etiquette were not posted at entrances or in common areas, and symptomatic residents were not consistently placed on droplet precautions. Staff interviews revealed inconsistent use of personal protective equipment (PPE), with some staff wearing masks and others not, and Enhanced Barrier Precautions signage was used instead of droplet precautions for residents with confirmed influenza. Residents with flu-like symptoms were not always tested for influenza or offered antiviral treatment, and group activities and communal dining were not restricted during the outbreak. The facility also failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions during high-contact care activities, such as catheter care, for a resident with an indwelling catheter. Staff did not consistently don gowns as required, and appropriate signage was not placed on resident doors. The Infection Preventionist was new to the position and was not present during critical periods of the outbreak, leading to a lack of oversight and documentation. The facility did not maintain a line list or illness log, did not track or trend new cases or staff illness, and did not provide in-service training specific to influenza precautions during the outbreak. These failures resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation, as determined by the surveyors.
Removal Plan
- All corrective actions to remove the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) were completed
Failure to Administer Medications and Provide Supervision During Influenza Outbreak
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect residents from neglect by not ensuring prescribed medications were administered, failing to notify physicians of missed medications, and not providing appropriate supervision and monitoring during a period of increased resident illness and high acuity related to an influenza outbreak. On the night in question, only one RN was present in the facility from approximately midnight to 7:00 AM, responsible for all 58 residents, including those on two separate units. This staffing shortage resulted from a nurse calling in sick, with no documented attempts by facility leadership to secure replacement coverage, and no nurse being assigned to one of the units. The facility's daily assignment sheets and timecards confirmed that only one licensed nurse was present during this critical period, and the facility's contingency plan for staffing emergencies was found to be inadequate and lacking actionable processes. Multiple residents did not receive their scheduled medications, including pain medications, antibiotics, and other essential treatments. For example, one resident did not receive morning doses of hydrocodone, Lasix, or gabapentin; another missed doses of pregabalin, sodium chloride, and other medications; and a resident on IV antibiotics did not receive scheduled doses. Medication Administration Records and controlled drug logs confirmed these omissions, and interviews with residents and staff corroborated that medications were missed and not administered as ordered. Additionally, the facility failed to notify physicians of these missed medications, and the medical director was unaware of the situation until informed by surveyors. During the influenza outbreak, the facility did not identify the outbreak in a timely manner, failed to initiate droplet precautions, did not notify the health department, and did not provide timely antiviral treatment or maintain outbreak surveillance and staff illness tracking. The facility's policies required adequate staffing and oversight, but these were not followed, and the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program did not identify or correct the systemic failures in infection control and staffing. Interviews with staff and leadership confirmed a lack of clear direction regarding nursing coverage responsibilities, insufficient oversight, and a lack of timely physician notification for missed medications, placing all residents at risk during the outbreak.
Removal Plan
- The Administrator held an emergency Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) meeting with the Medical Director, Director of Nursing, Infection Preventionist, Medical Records nurse, Life Connections Coordinator, Wound Care nurse, and others as part of the Interdisciplinary team to discuss findings from the State Agency, discuss immediate actions, and further interventions. Immediate actions included in-servicing all staff on Abuse and Neglect, in-servicing nurses on medication administration and medication errors, in-servicing all staff on flu outbreak and isolation precautions, reviewing policy for QAPI for any changes needed and as re-education in policy, reviewing and updating facility assessment to identify updated needs to staff per unit and the contingency plan for emergencies, completing a 100 percent audit on all medication carts compared to medication orders to ensure all medications were accessible in the building, in-servicing the Infection Preventionist on roles and responsibilities, and reviewing and updating policies on Abuse and Neglect, medication administration, medication errors, QAPI, flu outbreak, isolation precautions, and expectations of the Infection Preventionist. Staff were in-serviced with new policies.
- The Administrator notified the Medical Director of missed medications during the QAPI meeting. All missed medications were reviewed with the Medical Director. No new orders were given. No adverse reactions were noted due to missed medications.
- The Director of Nursing began an in-service for all staff on the policies and procedures of Abuse and Neglect. No employee was permitted to return to work until they completed the in-service.
- The Director of Nursing began an in-service on medication administration and medication errors to educate all nursing staff. This in-service included procedures for when medication cannot be located anywhere in the facility. If medication is not available, staff should contact pharmacy and pull medication from emergency kit. Any missed medications are to be reported to the Director of Nursing and Medical Director immediately, an incident report is to be completed, the resident observed for any adverse reactions, and the family/resident representative is to be notified. Any tasks left undone are to be reported to relief during report for oncoming shift. No employee was permitted to return to work until they completed the in-service.
- Administrator and Director of Nursing reviewed Flu outbreak and Isolation precautions policy and procedures. The Director of Nursing began an in-service for flu outbreak and isolation precautions to educate all staff. All staff are to continue to monitor residents and staff for flu-like symptoms and report any findings to the immediate supervisor. No employee was permitted to return to work until they completed the in-service.
- The Administrator reviewed policy on Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement plan and policy for re-education purposes and to review new policy. The QAPI plan and policy was reviewed with the facility's Interdisciplinary Team including the Administrator, Medical Director, Director of Nursing, Infection Preventionist, Medical Records nurse, Life Connections Coordinator, Wound Care nurse and others in a follow up QAPI meeting.
- The facility Administrator began reviewing and updating the facility assessment to reflect correct staffing and supervision by shift and by unit related to the facility's acuity level. The Facility Administrator began updating the contingency plan for staffing emergencies within the facility assessment. The contingency plan will be initiated and is as follows: Facility will utilize On-call for staffing needs and call ins. On-call will notify Director of Nursing if not able to cover. Facility will utilize Consultants and/or transfer staff from other nursing facilities within partnership to assist and cover staffing needs. The new facility assessment was reviewed with the interdisciplinary team during follow up QAPI.
- The Infection Preventionist (IP) was included in an in-service held by the Director of Nursing for policy and procedures of outbreak surveillance and staff-illness tracking during an outbreak to be completed before beginning of their next shift. Due to this outbreak being finished, IP nurse was instructed to continue to monitor residents and staff for flu-like symptoms and to report to Director of Nursing any findings.
- The Director of Nursing, Medical Records nurse, and Wound Care nurse completed a 100 percent audit to compare the current medication orders to the medication on the carts and in medication rooms to verify all medications ordered were readily available in the facility. No negative findings during audit.
- The Administrator notified the Mississippi Department of Health of the flu outbreak.
- The Administrator held a follow-up QAPI meeting to discuss all immediate actions that were in place. All in-services and audits were completed. All staff would continue to monitor any residents or staff for flu-like symptoms, staffing would be reviewed daily to ensure all areas were covered according to the facility assessment, and daily reviews of missed medications would be reviewed each morning in clinical meeting.
Failure to Provide Sufficient Nursing and Nurse Aide Staffing During Influenza Outbreak
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide sufficient licensed nurse and nurse aide coverage to meet resident needs, particularly during an influenza outbreak. On one unit, only one Registered Nurse was responsible for all 58 residents in the facility overnight, resulting in missed medications and lack of resident monitoring. The facility's staffing records showed that only one nurse was present from approximately midnight to 7:00 AM, and there was no documentation of efforts to secure additional coverage after a nurse called in sick. Interviews with staff confirmed that the on-call nurse was also ill and unable to work, and that administrative staff, who were not licensed nurses, attempted to assist but could not provide necessary care or medication administration. Residents reported not receiving their scheduled morning medications, including pain medications, and staff confirmed that medication passes were missed. In addition to the nursing shortage, the facility failed to provide sufficient nurse aide staffing to ensure that residents received scheduled showers and baths. Documentation revealed that several residents missed multiple scheduled showers or baths over the course of a month, and both residents and staff reported that there were not enough CNAs to complete all required bathing care. Interviews with CNAs and LPNs indicated that staffing levels were inadequate to meet resident needs, especially on shower days, and that management was aware of the ongoing problem. The Director of Nursing and Administrator both acknowledged that CNA staffing shortages and high resident acuity were persistent issues, particularly on weekends. The facility's policies and facility assessment did not provide adequate detail on staffing needs by shift and by unit, nor did they include a specific contingency plan for staffing emergencies. The facility lacked a current policy for contingency or emergency staffing and did not have a documented process for on-call procedures in the event of staff call-ins. During the influenza outbreak, the facility did not activate its emergency plan or utilize agency staff, and no updates were made to the contingency plan following the incident. The Medical Director was not informed of the staffing shortage during the outbreak and stated that additional staff should have been provided given the increase in resident acuity.
Removal Plan
- The Administrator held an emergency Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting with the Medical Director, Director of Nursing, Infection Preventionist, Medical Records nurse, Life Connections Coordinator, Wound Care nurse and others as part of the Interdisciplinary team to discuss findings from the State Agency, discuss immediate actions, and further interventions. Immediate actions were decided as in-servicing all staff on Abuse and Neglect, in-servicing nurses on medication administration and medication errors, in-servicing all staff on flu outbreak and isolation precautions. The Administrator would review policy for Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement for any changes needed and as re-education in policy. The Administrator would review and update facility assessment to identify updated needs to staff per unit and the contingency plan for emergencies. Administrative nurses would complete a 100 percent audit on all medication carts compared to medication orders to ensure all medications were accessible in the building. The Infection Preventionist would be in-serviced on the roles and responsibilities of an Infection Preventionist. Policies on Abuse and Neglect, medication administration, medication errors, QAPI, flu outbreak, isolation precautions, and the expectations of the Infection Preventionist were all reviewed and updated. Staff were in-serviced with new policies.
- The Administrator notified Medical Director of missed medications during QAPI meeting. All missed medications were reviewed with Medical Director during this meeting. No new orders were given. No adverse reactions were noted due to missed medications.
- The Director of Nursing began an in-service for all staff on the policies and procedures of Abuse and Neglect. No employee was permitted to return to work until they completed the in-service.
- The Director of Nursing began an in-service on medication administration and medication errors to educate all nursing staff. This in-service included procedures for when medication cannot be located anywhere in the facility. If medication is not available, staff should contact pharmacy and pull medication from emergency kit. Any missed medications are to be reported to the Director of Nursing and Medical Director immediately, an incident report is to be completed, the resident observed for any adverse reactions, and the family/resident representative is to be notified. Any tasks left undone are to be reported to relief during report for oncoming shift. No employee was permitted to return to work until they completed the in-service.
- Administrator and Director of Nursing reviewed Flu outbreak and Isolation precautions policy and procedures. The Director of Nursing began an in-service for flu outbreak and isolation precautions to educate all staff. All staff are to continue to monitor residents and staff for flu-like symptoms and report any findings to the immediate supervisor. No employee was permitted to return to work until they completed the in-service.
- The Administrator reviewed policy on Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement plan and policy for re-education purposes and to review new policy. The Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement plan and policy was reviewed with the facility's Interdisciplinary Team including the Administrator, Medical Director, Director of Nursing, Infection Preventionist, Medical Records nurse, Life Connections Coordinator, Wound Care nurse and others in a follow up Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting.
- The facility Administrator began reviewing and updating the facility assessment to reflect correct staffing and supervision by shift and by unit related to the facility's acuity level. The Facility Administrator began updating the contingency plan for staffing emergencies within the facility assessment. The contingency plan will be initiated and is as follows: Facility will utilize On-call for staffing needs and call ins. On-call will notify Director of Nursing if not able to cover. Facility will utilize Consultants and/or transfer staff from other nursing facilities within partnership to assist and cover staffing needs. The new facility assessment was reviewed with the interdisciplinary team during follow up QAPI.
- The Infection Preventionist (IP) was included in an in-service held by the Director of Nursing for policy and procedures of outbreak surveillance and staff-illness tracking during an outbreak to be completed before beginning of their next shift. Due to this outbreak being finished, IP nurse was instructed to continue to monitor residents and staff for flu-like symptoms and to report to Director of Nursing any findings.
- The Director of Nursing, Medical Records nurse, and Wound Care nurse completed a 100 percent audit to compare the current medication orders to the medication on the carts and in medication rooms to verify all medications ordered were readily available in the facility. No negative findings during audit.
- The Administrator notified the Mississippi Department of Health of the flu outbreak.
- The Administrator held a follow-up QAPI meeting to discuss all immediate actions that were in place. All in-services and audits were completed. All staff would continue to monitor any residents or staff for flu-like symptoms, staffing would be reviewed daily to ensure all areas were covered according to the facility assessment, and daily reviews of missed medications would be reviewed each morning in clinical meeting.
Failure to Store and Maintain Food Items Safely and Sanitarily
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to store and maintain food items in a safe and sanitary manner, as evidenced by multiple expired and spoiled products found during surveyor observation. Specifically, ten loaves of wheat bread with an expiration date that had already passed were found, along with five quarts each of nectar-consistency and moderately thick Thick & Easy milk, both past their use-by dates. Additionally, an opened gallon of Sweet Baby Ray's teriyaki sauce was stored on a dry goods shelf instead of being refrigerated as required by the manufacturer's instructions. In the refrigerator, peanut butter pudding with an expired date and three bell peppers that were deteriorating and macerated were also observed. The Head of the dietary department acknowledged these findings and confirmed that dietary staff were responsible for ensuring food items were not expired, were refrigerated appropriately, and were not overly ripe. The Administrator stated that dietary staff are expected to receive regular in-service training, perform routine checks of food storage areas, and consistently follow established procedures, noting that the staff involved had been employed at the facility for an extended period and should be familiar with these tasks.
Failure to Provide Clean Linens and Maintain a Safe, Clean Environment
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident was left with soiled bed linens for multiple days, despite facility policy requiring a safe, clean, and comfortable environment with clean bed and bath linens. Observations over several days revealed the resident's bed sheets were visibly soiled with blood and other stains, attributed to the resident's weeping and bleeding legs. The resident reported that her sheets were only changed on shower days, and on multiple occasions, she confirmed that her linens had not been changed for at least a week. Staff interviews corroborated that the soiled linens were not changed, even after being made aware of their condition, and clean linens were left in the room but not placed on the bed. The resident involved was cognitively intact, as indicated by a BIMS score of 15, and had a medical history including Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Despite the resident's ability to communicate her needs and the visible evidence of soiled linens, staff failed to provide timely linen changes. The DON and Administrator both acknowledged that residents should not be left on soiled linens and that linens are expected to be changed at least every other day and as needed, but these expectations were not met in this instance.
Failure to Develop and Implement Comprehensive Care Plans for Catheter Care and Scheduled Bathing
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans for three residents, as required by policy. One resident with an indwelling catheter did not have a care plan addressing the use and care of the catheter, despite having a physician's order for catheter care and a diagnosis of mechanical complication of a urinary catheter. The resident's comprehensive MDS assessment also documented the presence of the catheter, but no corresponding care plan was created within the required timeframe. Additionally, two residents with scheduled bathing and shower interventions in their care plans did not receive these services as planned. Documentation showed that one resident received only one bath during the month, missing twelve scheduled showers, while another resident missed seven scheduled showers. Both residents expressed dissatisfaction with the frequency of their baths and showers, and the DON acknowledged ongoing issues with staff following care plans for bathing due to CNA staffing challenges. Interviews with staff and administration confirmed awareness of the missed care and the lack of a care plan for the resident with a catheter.
Failure to Administer Ordered Medications and Notify Physician
Penalty
Summary
Nursing staff failed to administer prescribed medications to a resident as required by professional standards and facility policy. During a medication administration observation, an LPN did not provide the resident with Icar-C and Cyanocobalamin tablets because the medications were not available in the medication cart and were still on order. The LPN marked the medications as 'on order' in the electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) but did not notify the physician or the resident's representative about the missed doses, nor did she attempt to obtain the medications from an alternate pharmacy source. Interviews with the LPN, RN, DON, and Administrator confirmed that the LPN did not follow the facility's policy, which requires notification and efforts to secure medications from other sources when they are unavailable. The resident involved had a history of chronic kidney disease and a moderately impaired cognitive status, as indicated by a BIMS score of 10. The failure to administer the ordered medications and the lack of appropriate notifications or attempts to obtain the medications from another pharmacy source were directly observed and confirmed through interviews and record reviews. Facility policy required that medications be administered as prescribed and that appropriate steps be taken when medications are unavailable, which was not followed in this instance.
Failure to Provide Scheduled Bathing and Hygiene Assistance Due to Staffing Shortages
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide scheduled bathing and personal hygiene assistance to residents who were dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL), as required by their care plans and personal preferences. Three residents, all cognitively intact and requiring varying levels of assistance, were identified as not receiving the number of baths or showers scheduled for them. Documentation for these residents showed significant gaps, with one resident receiving only one bath in a month and others missing multiple scheduled showers. Residents expressed a desire for more frequent bathing and reported that their preferences were not being honored. Interviews with residents, family members, and staff confirmed that missed showers and baths were a recurring issue. Residents reported receiving baths only once a week despite wanting more frequent care, and family members observed signs of inadequate hygiene. Staff interviews revealed that CNA staffing shortages were a primary reason for the missed care, with CNAs unable to complete all scheduled showers and bed baths. Staff also noted discrepancies between assignment sheets and actual care provided, and acknowledged that documentation did not always accurately reflect the care delivered. Facility leadership, including the DON and Administrator, were aware of ongoing complaints and attributed the deficiencies to insufficient CNA staffing. The DON confirmed that staff were expected to honor resident preferences and make multiple attempts before documenting refusals, but acknowledged that this was not consistently happening. The Administrator also recognized the problem and stated that management had discussed revising the shower schedule, but at the time of the survey, residents continued to miss scheduled showers and baths.
Failure to Secure Medications and Assess for Safe Self-Administration
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident was allowed to keep an inhaler at the bedside without an assessment for safe self-administration and without a physician's order authorizing the medication to be kept at the bedside. Multiple observations over several days confirmed the inhaler was in plain view on the resident's bedside table, and the empty inhaler box was also present in the room. The resident reported using the inhaler as needed and stated that staff had previously left it in her room because she did not always require it when offered. The resident did not notify staff when using the inhaler. Facility policy required an interdisciplinary team assessment and a physician's order for self-administration of medications at the bedside, neither of which had been completed for this resident. The LPN was unaware that the resident had the inhaler at the bedside and confirmed there was no request for it. The DON acknowledged that no assessment or order was in place for the resident to self-administer the inhaler. The resident was cognitively intact, with a BIMS score of 15, and had diagnoses of chronic bronchitis and asthma, with a standing order for the inhaler as needed for shortness of breath.
Inaccurate Weight Documentation in Resident Medical Record
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to accurately document a resident's weight in the medical record, resulting in inconsistencies and incorrect clinical data for one of the sampled residents. Specifically, the resident's weight was recorded as 76.7 pounds on one date, while two days earlier it was documented as 167.2 pounds. Additionally, another set of weights showed a significant discrepancy, with 159.5 pounds recorded on one date and 189 pounds five days later. These errors were confirmed by both the Director of Nursing and a Registered Nurse, who identified that the weights were entered incorrectly in the electronic medical record by different LPNs. The inaccuracies led to the system incorrectly triggering weight alerts, which did not reflect the resident's actual clinical status. The resident involved had been admitted with diagnoses including heart failure, and the Minimum Data Set assessment indicated a significant weight loss over the review period. The errors in weight documentation were not identified at the time of entry, resulting in inaccurate information being maintained in the resident's medical record. The facility's process for reviewing weights was not sufficient to prevent or promptly correct these documentation errors.
Repeat Deficiency in Food Storage and Sanitation Due to Ineffective QAPI Oversight
Penalty
Summary
The facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee failed to sustain corrective actions to prevent recurrence of a previously cited deficiency related to food storage and sanitation. Despite having a policy in place that requires ongoing monitoring and evaluation of corrective actions, the facility was cited again for failing to ensure food items were stored and maintained in a safe and sanitary manner. Specifically, surveyors found that expired products and spoiled food were not discarded, and some items were not refrigerated according to manufacturer's instructions. These issues were observed during kitchen inspections and were consistent with similar findings from a previous survey. Record reviews and staff interviews confirmed that the facility had been cited for the same deficiency in the past, indicating a lack of effective ongoing oversight and monitoring by the QAPI Committee. The Administrator acknowledged awareness of the previous deficiencies and stated that monthly QAPI meetings were held to address high-risk concerns, but the recurrence of the same issues demonstrated that the corrective actions were not sustained or effective in preventing the deficiency from happening again.
Elopement Due to Inadequate Supervision and Resident Identification
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident, identified as an elopement risk with a BIMS score of 6 indicating severe cognitive impairment, was able to exit the facility without authorization. The resident, who had diagnoses including Wernicke's encephalopathy and vascular dementia, was last seen in the main lobby by her assigned CNA before the CNA left for a scheduled lunch break. Upon the CNA's return, the resident was missing from both the common area and her room, prompting immediate notification to the RN/MDS nurse and the initiation of a facility-wide search. The investigation revealed that the resident followed a dietary aide out of the front door as the aide was leaving at the end of his shift. The dietary aide, who did not recognize the individual as a resident due to her street clothes and purse, assumed she was a visitor and allowed her to exit behind him. The aide later observed the resident attempting to enter a parked vehicle in the lot before returning to the facility entrance. The resident remained outside for approximately 35 minutes before being found knocking on the front door by another CNA during the search. At the time she was found, the resident was appropriately dressed, carrying her purse, and did not display signs of distress or injury. Staff interviews confirmed that the resident was care-planned as an elopement risk, wore a yellow identification bracelet, and was listed in the facility's wander book. Despite these precautions, the dietary aide was unaware of her status and allowed her to exit. The facility is located near a four-lane highway and industrial complex, with no fencing or restricted barriers between the grounds and the surrounding area. The failure to provide adequate supervision and to ensure staff could properly identify residents resulted in the resident's unauthorized exit and exposure to potential harm.
Removal Plan
- CNA#1 reported Resident #1 missing to MDS Nurse #1, who called Code W (elopement), and all staff began a search of the facility and perimeter.
- Resident #1 was brought inside with no signs of distress after being found outside.
- Administrator was notified by MDS Nurse about the incident.
- MDS Nurse completed a body audit with no signs or symptoms of injury.
- MDS Nurse completed a head count of all current residents in the facility.
- MDS Nurse notified Resident #1's representative of the incident.
- Medical Director was notified of Resident #1's incident and no new orders were given.
- Administrator arrived at the facility and checked that all doors were functioning properly.
- Administrator interviewed all employees and any residents that had interactions with Resident #1 prior to the incident.
- Administrator began in-service for all employees on elopement policy and procedures; all staff would be in-serviced before returning to their next shift.
- Administrator reported incident to State Agency.
- An emergency Quality Assurance & Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee meeting was held to discuss incident, actions taken, and further interventions.
- Social Services Director spoke with Resident #1 and noted no psychosocial harm due to incident.
- Maintenance Director conducted a quality check of all doors to make sure they were operating as expected and door alarms were added to all of the doors.
- Regional Director of Operations interviewed Resident #1 and Resident #2 for any details they remember about the incident.
- Education of elopement policy and procedures with dietary staff, including Dietary Aide #1.
- Wander assessments were completed on all active residents in the facility by DON, RN #1, LPN #1, and Medical Records LPN.
- Maintenance Director began elopement drills for all shifts.
- A follow up QAPI committee meeting was held by Administrator to discuss that all interventions were in place.
- Maintenance will conduct a quality check of all doors, an elopement drill on each shift and put alarms on each of the doors.
- Administrative nurses completed wander assessments on all current residents, update care plans and wander books accordingly; completed a 100 percent audit of care plans; completed 100 percent audit of wander books located at both nurse's stations.
- Social services would interview Resident #1 for any psychosocial harm.
- Administrative staff would in-service all employees on elopement policy and procedures before their next shift.
- Elopement drills on all shifts and one elopement drill per week for four weeks on alternating shifts and one per month for six months on alternating shifts.
- Person-centered in-services will be completed with all staff for any new residents identified as an elopement risk or any current residents who are newly identified as an elopement risk.
- Incident was reported to Attorney General's office by Administrator.
Resident Falls During Bed Bath Due to Inadequate Supervision
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the safety of a resident during a bed bath, resulting in the resident falling from the bed and sustaining bilateral femoral fractures. The incident occurred when a Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) was providing care and a bath to the resident, who was able to assist with bed mobility. During the bath, the resident became slippery and rolled out of bed while attempting to hold onto the side rail. The CNA was unable to catch the resident before she fell to the floor. The facility's policy on accidents and incidents emphasizes maintaining a resident environment free of hazards and providing supervision to prevent accidents. However, during the incident, the resident's slipperiness due to the bath was not adequately managed, leading to the fall. The Director of Nursing (DON) and the Administrator were notified of the incident, and an investigation was conducted, which ruled the fall as accidental. The resident had been admitted to the facility with diagnoses including Atrial Fibrillation and was assessed as having no impairment to her upper extremities and being able to roll with partial/moderate assistance.
Failure in QAPI Program Leads to Resident Injury
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure its Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program effectively addressed and prevented the recurrence of resident accidents. This deficiency was highlighted by an incident involving a resident who sustained bilateral fractures. The incident occurred when a Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) attempted to provide care and a bath to the resident. During the process, the resident was turned onto her left side, and due to being slippery, she rolled out of bed, resulting in the fractures. This incident followed a prior citation for F689 (Accident Hazards) where two CNAs improperly positioned a resident in bed, leading to a fall with injury. Despite the facility's ongoing audits to monitor compliance with safety and accident prevention measures, the recurrence of such an incident indicates that the systemic corrective actions were not sustained effectively. The Director of Nurses confirmed the review of the previous CMS-2567 survey, acknowledging the continued efforts to monitor and prevent accidents, yet the deficiency persisted.
Inadequate Supervision Leads to Resident Fall
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a vulnerable resident from falling out of bed due to inadequate supervision and improper positioning by two CNAs. The incident involved a resident with paraplegia who required substantial assistance with bed mobility. On the day of the incident, two CNAs were providing care to the resident, intending to transfer her to a wheelchair. However, they noticed the resident needed a brief change. During this process, one CNA left the room, leaving the other CNA to manage the resident alone. The remaining CNA attempted to reposition the resident using a draw sheet, which resulted in the resident sliding out of bed and falling to the floor. The resident, who was cognitively intact, reported feeling as though she was pushed out of bed, although the facility's investigation concluded the fall was accidental. The resident sustained injuries, including bleeding from the right elbow, bruises on the right side, and swelling of the right knee. The bed was elevated to waist level, and the resident was found on the floor with a saturated brief and draw sheet. The facility's policy required that the resident environment be free of hazards and that residents receive adequate supervision, which was not adhered to in this case.
Failure to Serve Food at Appetizing Temperature
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that food was served at an appetizing temperature, affecting at least one resident and potentially all residents receiving meals from the dietary department. Observations and interviews revealed that the steam table used to keep food warm was partially inoperable, with two out of four compartments not functioning. The dietary staff attempted to mitigate this by pouring boiling water into one of the non-working compartments. Despite being informed, the maintenance department had not repaired or replaced the steam table. Additionally, during meal preparation, trays were not covered, which likely contributed to the food cooling down before reaching the residents. Resident #53, who was cognitively intact, along with other residents, had complained about receiving cold food for several months. The issue was not resolved despite being raised in Resident Council meetings over four of the past six months. The dietary manager confirmed that the food was lukewarm during a test tray evaluation. The facility's registered dietitian was unaware of the complaints, and the administrator was only recently informed of the issue. The resident involved had been admitted with diagnoses including bilateral primary osteoarthritis of the knee and essential hypertension.
Food Safety and Hygiene Deficiencies in Kitchen
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper food safety and hygiene practices in the kitchen, as observed during two separate inspections. During the first observation, three green bell peppers were found with soft, pliable spots and white biological growth, indicating spoilage. Additionally, 15 containers of seasonings were left open and exposed, which could lead to contamination. The cook acknowledged the condition of the bell peppers and the exposed seasonings, admitting unawareness of the produce's over-ripeness. The Dietary Manager (DM) confirmed that both she and the cook were responsible for maintaining food quality and ensuring that spoiled foods were discarded and seasonings were properly sealed. In a subsequent observation, a staff member was seen picking up a glove from the floor and placing it on a food prep table where pureed tomatoes and sandwiches were being prepared. The cook admitted to this action, recognizing that the glove should have been discarded instead of being placed on the table. The DM was aware of these issues and stated that it was her expectation that spoiled foods be discarded, seasonings be closed, and items picked up from the floor be discarded appropriately. The facility's Administrator also acknowledged that these issues should not have occurred, emphasizing the expectation for proper storage and disposal of items.
Inaccurate Staffing Data Submission to CMS
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that their Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) submissions to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) were accurate for the second quarter of the 2024 fiscal year. This deficiency was identified through staff interviews and a review of Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reports (Casper) data, which revealed excessively low weekend staffing and a one-star staffing rating. The issue arose because several employees who worked multiple roles were not correctly coded in the PBJ system, leading to inaccurate staffing data being reported. Specific instances of incorrect coding were identified on several dates, affecting the reported staffing levels. Interviews with facility staff, including the Senior Director of Operations (SDO), Business Office Manager (BOM), and Director of Nursing (DON), revealed that the coding errors were due to the system defaulting to employees' primary roles, rather than reflecting their actual duties on specific days. The BOM, after attending a training session, discovered the coding discrepancies and conducted an audit that confirmed the errors. The Administrator, who had recently assumed her role, was informed of the issue and the need for manual coding adjustments to ensure accurate reporting. The deficiency was confirmed by the Administrator, who acknowledged the facility's one-star rating and the need for corrective action.
Unresolved Grievance of Cold Food Due to Malfunctioning Equipment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to resolve a grievance regarding cold food reported by Resident Council members over a period of four out of six months. The facility's policy on grievances requires active resolution and keeping residents informed of progress, but this was not adhered to. Resident Council meeting minutes documented grievances about cold food, and during a meeting, several residents confirmed the issue persisted. The Dietary Manager acknowledged the reports and had previously attempted to address the issue by coordinating with the Director of Nursing to speed up tray delivery, which initially seemed effective. However, the problem persisted due to a malfunctioning steam table, which was reported to the Maintenance Department and the past Administrator. The Maintenance Director confirmed receiving a maintenance request for the steam table and attempted a repair, but the component was dry rotted. Despite informing the previous Administrator and ordering a part, the repair was unsuccessful, and no further action was taken until the current Administrator was informed by the Regional Director of Operations. The Administrator was unaware of the issue until recently and had not been informed by the Maintenance Director or the Dietary Manager. The Maintenance Director had not scheduled a technician to fix the steam table until the day before the surveyor's interview, indicating a lack of timely follow-up on the issue.
Failure to Serve Meals Simultaneously in Dining Room
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to treat residents in a dignified manner during a dining room observation, as evidenced by not providing meals consecutively to all residents seated at the same table. On the observed day, 20 residents were in the dining room waiting for lunch, which was delayed due to kitchen issues. Staff members, including LPNs and a CNA, began serving trays, but some residents did not receive their meals at the same time as their tablemates. This delay in service was noted for three residents, who expressed dissatisfaction with the timing of their meal service. Resident #10, who was admitted with a diagnosis of Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis, was cognitively intact and had been waiting since 11:30 AM. Despite being seated with another resident who received their meal earlier, Resident #10 did not receive his tray until much later, after repeated requests by staff. Similarly, Resident #27, diagnosed with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and also cognitively intact, experienced a delay in receiving her meal, which was mistakenly placed on a hall cart. She expressed a desire to be served simultaneously with her tablemate. Resident #160, admitted with Paraplegia and assessed for modified independence, also faced a delay in meal service, which affected her routine, including her smoke break. The staff, including LPNs and the Dietary Manager, acknowledged the issue, confirming that not all residents were served at the same time, which was a concern for resident dignity. The Director of Nursing and the Administrator also recognized the dignity issue, emphasizing the expectation for all residents to be served simultaneously in the dining room.
Failure to Honor Resident Meal Preferences
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to honor the residents' requests for alternative menu options, specifically hamburgers and fries, as listed on the alternative menu. This deficiency was identified through observations, record reviews, and interviews with residents and staff. The facility's policy on resident rights and menu alternatives was not adhered to, as residents were not provided with the alternative meals they requested. The facility's policy stated that an alternative meat or entree and vegetable should be provided at every meal to accommodate personal food preferences or refusals. Resident #53, who was cognitively intact, reported that he had been requesting hamburgers and fries as an alternative meal for months, but was consistently denied. He was informed by staff that hamburgers and fries were not allowed due to previous overconsumption by residents, which led to budget concerns. Despite the alternative menu being posted in the dining room, the residents were not informed of the change in policy, and the old menu was never removed. Resident #18, who had severe cognitive impairment, also expressed a desire for hamburgers and fries, which he used to receive as an alternative meal, but was similarly denied. Interviews with staff, including LPNs, CNAs, the Dietary Manager, and the Registered Dietitian, revealed a lack of communication and awareness regarding the residents' dissatisfaction with the menu options. The Dietary Manager confirmed that the previous Administrator had decided to remove hamburgers and fries from the alternative menu due to budget concerns, but this decision was not communicated to the residents. The new Administrator, who had only been at the facility for three weeks, was unaware of the previous changes and expected the kitchen staff to honor residents' choices as per the alternative menu.
Unsecured Medication Cart Found in Hallway
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a medication cart was secured and locked, as observed during a survey. An unattended medication cart was found unlocked in the hallway, containing unsecured pills and a needle on top. The cart was left unattended by an LPN who was administering medications to residents down the hallway. The LPN admitted that the cart had been left unlocked due to a broken locking mechanism and had been stationed in the hallway since the previous Wednesday. The LPN was unaware of the needle and loose pills in the cart, acknowledging that a confused resident could have accessed them. The Director of Nursing (DON) explained that the medication cart was changed out by the night shift because it was broken and would not lock. The night shift failed to remove the needle and medications from the cart. The DON had not noticed the cart in the hallway and expected nurses to ensure medication carts are locked when not in use. The Administrator also expected medications and supplies to be secured in a medication room when not in use and stated that the broken cart should have been removed from the facility.
Failure to Remove Old Transdermal Patch Before Applying New One
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to prevent a significant medication error involving a transdermal medication patch for one of the residents. The facility's policy on the application of transdermal patches requires the removal of the old patch before applying a new one. However, on 1/10/24, an LPN applied a new Duragesic (fentanyl) patch to a resident without removing the old one. The LPN reported that she could not find the old patch and assumed it had been removed by the previous shift. This resulted in the resident having two fentanyl patches on when he arrived at the emergency department on 1/12/24. The Medication Administration Record for January 2024 did not document the removal of the old patch on 1/10/24, only the application of the new one. The resident involved had a history of Alzheimer's Disease and Cerebral Infarction and was admitted to the facility on 12/31/21. The physician's order required the application of a Duragesic-25 patch every 72 hours, with the old patch to be removed per schedule. The Director of Nurses confirmed that the resident had two patches on before being sent to the emergency department. This incident highlights a failure in following the facility's medication administration policy, leading to a significant medication error.
Latest citations in Mississippi
A resident with advanced dementia and severe cognitive impairment sustained a bruised left eye and facial bruising after being struck by a CNA. The CNA initially claimed the injury occurred accidentally while pushing the resident to a dining table and denied hitting the resident, but an LPN and another CNA reported that the resident stated she had hit the CNA and was hit back in the eye, demonstrating a slapping motion. Nursing documentation described left orbital ecchymosis, bruising along the bridge of the nose and cheek, tenderness, minimal edema, and the resident’s complaint of soreness, confirming a significant injury resulting from the physical abuse.
The facility failed to protect residents’ right to a dignified and comfortable environment when it did not effectively manage one cognitively impaired resident’s ongoing nighttime yelling, which repeatedly disrupted the sleep of two cognitively intact residents. Staff, including a CNA, the DON, and the Administrator, were aware that this resident, diagnosed with dementia and psychosis, frequently yelled and screamed at night while often sleeping during the day. Progress notes documented nighttime hollering, and interviews confirmed that the disruptive behavior persisted over time, interfering with other residents’ ability to rest.
Surveyors found that the facility failed to protect two residents’ rights to dignity and privacy during routine care. One resident, with moderate cognitive impairment and dependent for toilet hygiene, was observed receiving incontinence care while uncovered, with the room door open and the privacy curtain only partially drawn, allowing visibility into the hallway despite facility policy requiring full privacy. Another resident, dependent for eating and with hemiplegia after a stroke, was assisted with lunch by a CNA who stood over the resident instead of sitting at eye level as required by the facility’s feeding skills checklist. Staff interviews, including with CNAs, an LPN, the DON, and the Administrator, confirmed that existing policies and in-service training directed staff to provide privacy during incontinence care and to sit beside residents when assisting with meals to ensure dignified care.
A resident with epilepsy, skin infection, an upper arm wound, gastrostomy status, and moderate cognitive impairment was observed twice resting in bed with a lunch tray while the call light was not within reach—once on the floor under the bed and once hanging behind the mattress, out of sight. The resident reported being able to use the call light but not knowing where it was. Staff, including CNAs, an LPN, the DON, and the Administrator, stated that call lights are expected to be left within residents’ reach and that training and competencies address this requirement, but there was no specific written policy on call light placement.
A resident with moderate cognitive impairment, dependent for toilet hygiene and with multiple medical conditions, was observed receiving incontinent care in which a CNA removed a urine-soaked brief, changed the bed sheet, and applied a clean brief without performing any required perineal cleansing of the front or back. Facility policy and the peri-care skills checklist specified that male residents must have the perineal area, including the penis, scrotum, and inner thighs, washed, rinsed, and dried during incontinent care. The CNA later acknowledged having been trained and competency-checked on this procedure and knowing cleansing was required. Other staff, including a CNA supervisor, an LPN, the DON, and the Administrator, confirmed that proper incontinent care includes full perineal cleansing in addition to brief changes, establishing that the observed omission did not follow facility policy or professional standards intended to prevent UTIs.
Surveyors found that staff failed to follow infection control practices during PEG tube and wound care. Two residents with PEG tubes had sites with visible brown, crusted or yellowish drainage that had not been cleaned for several days, despite physician orders for daily cleansing and, when indicated, dressings. In another case, a CNA provided peri-care for stool and then assisted with a stage IV sacral pressure ulcer dressing change without changing gloves or performing hand hygiene, contrary to facility policy and staff expectations for aseptic technique.
Surveyors found that the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, and homelike environment when a resident’s room contained odorous soiled linens left on the floor and later placed on furniture with clean clothing, and the bed was made with torn linens exposing the mattress. Other residents reported that housekeeping did not clean under beds, and multiple large dead roaches were repeatedly observed under several beds, with one resident stating he often disposed of dead roaches himself. Residents also reported refusing to use the north shower room due to dirty clothing, feces, and residue on shower chairs and floors; an observation confirmed the presence of soiled clothing, a soiled brief, and unidentified substances on the shower chair and floor, despite staff acknowledging that CNAs were expected to clean and sanitize the shower room after each use.
The facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program, as evidenced by repeated observations of roaches and other insects in multiple resident rooms and common areas. Surveyors found gnats and dead roaches under beds, while several residents reported seeing roaches on ceilings, walls, and floors, including roaches falling onto them at night and having to remove dead roaches themselves. A family member reported bringing her own roach spray due to concerns about roaches in a loved one’s room. During a Resident Council meeting, roaches were seen crawling across the floor, and residents stated that roaches were commonly observed throughout the building. Although the contracted pest control provider reported monthly service focused mainly on entry points and exterior areas and facility staff described processes for reporting pests, the persistent roach activity showed the program was not effectively preventing or controlling pests.
A resident with multiple chronic conditions, who relied on phone contact with a seriously ill significant other, lost access to private communication after her personal cell phone was broken and sent out for repair. Facility policy guarantees residents access to a telephone and private communication, but there was no cordless phone available on the relevant hall, and staff, including the DON, SSD, and Administrator, confirmed there was no convenient method for residents on that hall to make private calls without arranging to use a staff office. This resulted in the resident having no readily available, private telephone option.
A resident with heart failure, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, moderate cognitive impairment, and total dependence on staff for personal and toilet hygiene reported difficulty obtaining assistance with ADLs. Observation revealed the resident had ten long, dirty fingernails extending several millimeters beyond the fingertips with black material underneath, and the resident stated they needed cleaning and cutting. An LPN confirmed the nails were too long and dirty, acknowledged that nursing staff were responsible for daily and weekly fingernail checks and for providing fingernail care as part of ADLs, and noted that such nails could cause skin damage or scratches. The DON and Administrator both confirmed that personal hygiene and grooming are part of ADLs and are expected to be provided for all residents dependent on staff.
Failure to Protect Cognitively Impaired Resident From Physical Abuse by CNA
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to protect a resident from abuse, resulting in the resident being struck in the eye by a CNA. Facility records show that a CNA reported to an LPN that the resident had a bruised left eye and initially stated the injury may have occurred while pushing the resident to the dining table due to the resident’s short, stooped posture. The CNA also reported that the resident used a racial slur toward her and that she verbally responded but denied striking the resident. However, subsequent interviews and the facility’s investigation determined that the resident’s injury was not caused by accidental contact with the dining table. Interviews with staff revealed conflicting accounts that led to the conclusion that the resident had been hit. An LPN stated that the resident reported being hit in the eye by the CNA and that another CNA heard a commotion and later observed bruising to the resident’s left eye. When this second CNA asked what happened, the resident reported that she hit the CNA and was hit back in the eye, while making a motion consistent with a slap. The LPN confirmed that the resident gave a similar account to her, indicating that the CNA had physically struck the resident. The resident involved was admitted to the Memory Care Unit with diagnoses including Alzheimer’s disease, cognitive communication deficit, and unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance, and had a BIMS score of 5 indicating severe cognitive impairment. A nursing progress note documented an acute follow-up assessment of left orbital ecchymosis, describing a dark red circular bruise to the left eye region, dark purple bruising along the lateral bridge of the nose extending to the superior left cheek, tenderness on palpation, minimal edema, and the resident’s complaint that the area was sore. Due to advanced Alzheimer’s disease, the resident was unable to reliably express additional symptoms, but the documented physical findings supported that the resident sustained a significant injury to the eye area as a result of being struck by the CNA.
Failure to Protect Residents’ Right to Rest Due to Unmanaged Nighttime Yelling
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure a dignified and comfortable environment by not effectively addressing ongoing disruptive nighttime behaviors of one resident that interfered with other residents’ ability to rest. Resident #1, admitted with diagnoses including Psychosis and Dementia and a BIMS score of 4 indicating severely impaired cognition, had documented episodes of hollering and yelling during nighttime hours, as noted in progress notes on 3/12/26 and 3/13/26. Interviews with cognitively intact residents, Resident #2 and Resident #3 (both with BIMS scores of 15), revealed that they frequently experienced disrupted sleep due to Resident #1 yelling loudly at night, while the environment was generally quiet during the day. Staff interviews confirmed awareness of the pattern of behavior. CNA #1, who worked both day and night shifts, reported that Resident #1 frequently yelled and screamed at intervals throughout the night and was generally quiet and often slept during the day, with staff assisting the resident out of bed into a geri-chair during both day and nighttime hours. The DON acknowledged the facility was aware of Resident #1’s increased nighttime yelling and extended daytime rest, attributing it to the resident’s Dementia and Psychosis, and stated that interventions such as monitoring, repositioning, offering care, and attempts at redirection had not stopped the behaviors. The Administrator also confirmed awareness of concerns that nighttime noise from Resident #1 affected other residents’ ability to rest. Despite this awareness and ongoing complaints from other residents, the disruptive nighttime yelling continued, resulting in a failure to uphold residents’ rights to a dignified existence and a comfortable environment.
Failure to Ensure Privacy and Dignified Care During Incontinence Care and Feeding
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure residents were treated with dignity and provided privacy during care, as required by resident rights policies and skills checklists. The facility’s Nursing Facility Resident Rights policy guaranteed residents the right to be treated with dignity, courtesy, and respect, and to have privacy during personal care. Facility skills checklists for feeding and peri/incontinent care specified that staff should sit facing residents at eye level when feeding and provide privacy by drawing curtains and closing doors during incontinence care. For Resident #2, surveyors observed a CNA providing incontinent care without closing the resident’s room door and with the privacy curtain only partially drawn. From the surveyor’s position at the bottom right corner of the bed, it was possible to see into the hallway while the resident was uncovered and exposed. Resident #2’s records showed admission with diagnoses including epilepsy, infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, an open wound of the left upper arm, and gastrostomy status. A recent MDS assessment documented a BIMS score of 11, indicating moderate cognitive impairment, and that the resident was dependent for toilet hygiene. The CNA later confirmed awareness that incontinence care required provision of privacy and that she had been trained and competency-checked on this requirement. For Resident #3, surveyors observed a CNA assisting the resident with eating while standing over the resident rather than sitting beside her, contrary to the facility’s feeding skills checklist and training. The DON intervened during the observation and instructed the CNA that staff were to sit next to residents while assisting with eating. The CNA stated she had forgotten to sit beside the resident. Resident #3’s records showed recent admission with diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke), anemia, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting the right dominant side, and a baseline care plan indicating the resident was dependent for eating. Other staff interviews, including with a CNA supervisor, an LPN, the DON, and the Administrator, confirmed that staff were trained at least monthly on residents’ rights, respectful and dignified care, provision of privacy during incontinence care, and the expectation that staff sit beside residents when assisting with eating.
Failure to Maintain Accessible Call Light for a Resident
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure a resident’s call light was maintained within reach as required by the facility’s feeding skills checklist. The skills checklist for feeding a resident specifies that staff must leave the call light within the resident’s reach after feeding. For Resident #2, surveyors observed on two separate occasions that the call light was not accessible. On one observation, the resident was awake in bed with a lunch tray on the overbed table, and the call light was found lying on the floor under the head of the bed. The resident stated he could use his call light but did not know where it was. On a subsequent observation, Resident #2 was again in bed with a lunch tray in front of him, and the call light was hanging behind the mattress at the head of the bed, out of his sight and reach. The resident again stated he could use the call light but did not know where it was. Record review showed the resident had epilepsy, an infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, an open wound of the left upper arm, gastrostomy status, and a BIMS score of 11 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Staff interviews with CNAs, an LPN, the DON, and the Administrator confirmed that call lights were expected to be within residents’ reach and answered timely, and that staff had received in-service training and competency checks on leaving call lights within reach. The Administrator also confirmed there was no specific written policy regarding call light placement.
Failure to Provide Required Perineal Cleansing During Incontinent Care
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide incontinent care in accordance with its own peri-care policy and professional standards of practice for a male resident who was dependent for toilet hygiene. The facility’s written policy for peri/incontinent care for male residents, revised in January 2023, required cleansing of the perineal area starting at the urethra and working outward, including washing and rinsing the penis, scrotum, inner thighs, and perineal area front and back, followed by thorough drying. Record review showed the resident had diagnoses including epilepsy, infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, an open wound of the left upper arm, and gastrostomy status, and a Quarterly MDS with a BIMS score of 11 indicating moderate cognitive impairment, with the resident assessed as dependent for toilet hygiene. On the observed date and time, CNA #1 provided incontinent care to this resident by removing a wet urine-soaked brief, changing the fitted sheet, and applying a clean, dry brief without cleansing the resident’s perineal area, front or back, contrary to facility policy. During a subsequent interview, CNA #1 acknowledged she had received in-service training and competency check-offs on peri-care and knew she was supposed to cleanse the perineal area but did not do so, stating she was nervous. Additional interviews with CNA #2 (CNA supervisor and scheduler), an LPN, the DON, and the Administrator confirmed that staff were trained using the Peri Care–Incontinent Care Skills Checklist and that proper incontinent care includes cleansing the perineal area, front and back, in addition to changing the brief. The failure to perform the required cleansing during incontinent care constituted the cited deficiency related to prevention of urinary tract infections.
Failure to Maintain Infection Control Practices During PEG Tube and Wound Care
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to implement its infection prevention and control program by not maintaining aseptic technique and not providing ordered dressing changes for residents with PEG tubes and a sacral pressure injury. Facility policies on infection control and clean dressing changes required wound care to be provided in a manner that decreases the potential for infection and cross-contamination, including removal of soiled dressings with gloves, discarding gloves, performing hand hygiene, and donning clean gloves before continuing care. The peri-care audit tool also required glove removal, hand hygiene, and re-gloving after peri-care. These standards were not followed during multiple observed care episodes. For one resident with a PEG tube and diagnoses including Alzheimer’s disease, functional quadriplegia, and gastrostomy status, surveyors observed the PEG tube site without a dressing and with a yellowish-brown substance beneath and around the external skin disk extending about one-fourth inch onto surrounding skin. A CNA and an LPN both confirmed there was no dressing in place and acknowledged the drainage at the site. The LPN stated PEG tube site care should be completed daily and as needed for increased drainage and acknowledged that, with no dressing and the amount of drainage present, there was no way to tell when the site was last cleaned. Record review showed a physician order, effective several months prior, for daily cleansing of the PEG tube stoma with normal saline, patting dry, and applying a dry drain dressing to avoid skin breakdown. For another resident with severe protein-calorie malnutrition and gastrostomy status, the PEG tube site was observed with thick brown, crusted substance beneath the external skin disk extending approximately one-half to three-fourths of an inch to the surrounding area. The resident reported the site had not been cleaned in about three days and later stated they might have to clean it themselves. Follow-up observations confirmed the site remained unclean with visible drainage, and an LPN and the DON both confirmed the presence of thick, brown drainage and that the site had not been cleaned in several days, despite an order for daily cleansing with soap and water, rinsing, patting dry, and leaving open to air or applying a dry dressing if drainage was present. In a separate observation involving a resident with a stage IV sacral pressure ulcer and severe cognitive impairment, a CNA provided peri-care for stool soiling, then immediately assisted with wound care using the same gloves worn during peri-care, without performing hand hygiene or changing gloves. The CNA, treatment nurse, DON, and ADON all acknowledged that hand hygiene and glove change should have occurred between peri-care and wound care and that this represented an infection control concern.
Failure to Maintain Clean Resident Rooms and Shower Facilities
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, as required by its Resident Rights & Quality of Life Policy. For one resident, surveyors observed a bag of odorous soiled linens resting on the floor of the room, and the resident’s bed was made with a bedspread that had a football-sized hole exposing the mattress. The resident, who was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 14 and had Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, reported that it was not unusual for bags of soiled linens to be left on the floor and for bedding to be damaged. A CNA confirmed that soiled linens were commonly left in bags on the floor after morning care and that torn bedding should not be used, and later placed the bag of soiled linens on the resident’s furniture where his clean clothing was hanging. The resident remained upset the following day, and a dead roach was observed under his bed near the headboard. Additional deficiencies were identified in other resident rooms. One resident with End Stage Renal Disease and a severely impaired cognition (BIMS score of 5) reported that housekeeping did not clean under the bed; surveyors observed three large dead roaches under the bed, which remained there the following day. When the Housekeeping Supervisor later observed the room, five dead roaches were present under the bed, and he stated the area should not have been in that condition. Another resident, with a diffuse traumatic brain injury and a moderately impaired cognition (BIMS score of 10), reported frequently picking up and disposing of dead roaches himself because staff did not remove them, and a large dead roach was observed under his bed. The facility also failed to maintain a clean and sanitary north shower room. During a Resident Council interview, multiple cognitively intact and moderately impaired residents reported refusing to use the shower room due to cleanliness concerns, including observations of dirty clothing, feces, and residue on shower chairs and floors. A housekeeper stated that while she cleaned the shower rooms multiple times a day, CNAs were responsible for cleaning and sanitizing the shower room after each use and that she had observed occasions when CNAs failed to do so. A subsequent observation of the north shower room revealed soiled clothing, including a soiled brief, on a shower chair, a yellow fluid-like substance on the floor and shower chair, and a white powdery substance on the floor, with no staff present. The Social Services Assistant, DON, and Administrator each acknowledged that staff were expected to clean and sanitize the shower room after each use.
Ongoing Roach Activity Demonstrates Ineffective Pest Control Program
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program as required by its pest control policy dated 9/1/2014, which states the center will maintain an ongoing program to keep the building free of insects and rodents. Surveyors observed multiple instances of roach and insect activity in resident rooms and common areas. In one cognitively intact resident’s room, gnats were seen flying and a dead roach was later found under the bed near the headboard. Another resident’s room contained three large dead roaches under the bed on two consecutive days; this resident reported that roaches were regularly seen in the room, especially at night, crawling on the ceiling and falling onto him and his roommate, and that staff had been notified but he had not seen staff respond to assess or treat the issue. A third resident reported seeing roaches on the ceiling and under the bed and stated he often removed dead roaches himself because staff did not; a large dead roach was observed under his bed. A family member of another resident reported feeling it was necessary to bring her own roach spray due to concerns about roaches in the resident’s room and stated she was told she could not keep the spray in the room, expressing concern that the roach problem needed to be addressed. During a Resident Council meeting, two large roaches were observed crawling across the floor, and residents reported that roaches were commonly seen in rooms and common areas, including on walls, ceilings, and floors, particularly at night. The contracted pest control provider reported he provides monthly services, focusing on different areas each visit, primarily treating entry points and exterior areas, and stated he had not personally observed roaches and received only occasional complaints. Facility leadership, including the housekeeping supervisor, DON, and Maintenance Director, described expectations that staff report pest sightings and that pest control services are available monthly and as needed, but the ongoing presence of roaches and dead insects in resident rooms and common areas demonstrated that the pest control program was not effectively preventing or controlling pests.
Failure to Ensure Resident Access to Private Telephone Communication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a resident’s right to reasonable access to and privacy in the use of a telephone for communication. Facility policy on Resident Rights, revised December 2016, states that residents are guaranteed access to a telephone, mail, and email, and the ability to communicate in person and by mail, email, and telephone with privacy. Resident #1 was admitted on 12/18/24 with diagnoses including Sjogren syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, chronic kidney disease, and morbid obesity. During an interview, the resident reported that she had dropped and broken her personal cellular telephone, which she had used for private communication, and that the facility did not have any telephone that was convenient for her to use privately. She stated that no staff had offered her the use of a staff office or any other mechanism for private communication, and she was upset because she relied on telephone contact with her significant other, who had cancer and was unable to visit. Observations and staff interviews confirmed the lack of accessible, private telephone options for residents on South Hall. An observation on the 100 Hall revealed there was no cordless telephone available for resident use. The DON confirmed that the facility did not have a method to provide residents on South Hall with private communication without first making arrangements or an appointment to use a staff office, and that the cordless telephones in the facility did not have sufficient range to reach South Hall. The SSD confirmed there were no cordless telephones at the South Hall nurses’ station that could be taken to residents’ rooms and acknowledged that Resident #1’s cell phone had been broken and sent out for repair. The Administrator also confirmed that residents on South Hall did not have a method for private communication without prior arrangements and acknowledged that access to private communication is a guaranteed resident right.
Failure to Provide Adequate ADL Assistance for Personal Hygiene
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) to maintain personal hygiene for one resident who was dependent on staff for care. Facility policy on ADLs, revised March 2018, stated that residents unable to carry out ADLs independently would receive services necessary to maintain good grooming and personal and oral hygiene. Record review showed the resident was admitted with heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and hypertension, had a BIMS score of 12 indicating moderate cognitive impairment, was always incontinent of bowel and bladder, and required substantial/maximal assistance for personal hygiene and was dependent for toilet hygiene. A complainant reported that the resident had expressed difficulty getting staff to provide assistance with ADLs. During an observation and interview with the resident, accompanied by an LPN, the resident reported ongoing difficulty obtaining assistance with ADLs. The surveyor observed that the resident had ten long, dirty fingernails protruding 3.0 to 3.5 millimeters past the fingertips, with a black substance beneath all fingernails; the resident stated they needed cleaning and cutting and were too long. The LPN described the fingernails as too long and dirty, confirmed that nursing staff were responsible for checking fingernails daily during care and weekly during body audits, and acknowledged that staff were responsible for providing fingernail care as part of ADLs. The LPN also confirmed that long, dirty, unkempt fingernails had the potential to cause damage or scratches to the resident’s skin. The DON stated she was not aware of any complaints from the resident but confirmed her expectation that ADLs for residents dependent on staff for personal hygiene would be maintained and provided as needed, and that licensed nurses trimmed fingernails for some residents while any nursing staff could clean under fingernails. The Administrator confirmed that personal hygiene and grooming were part of resident ADLs and were expected to be provided for all dependent residents.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release June 24, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
Trusted by long-term care providers and associations.



