Little Flower Manor
Inspection history, citations, penalties and survey trends for this long-term care facility in Darby, Pennsylvania.
- Location
- 1201 Springfield Road, Darby, Pennsylvania 19023
- CMS Provider Number
- 395821
- Inspections on file
- 17
- Latest survey
- December 11, 2025
- Citations (last 12 mo.)
- 1
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Little Flower Manor during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to maintain fire resistance in common wall separations as certain fire-rated doors did not positively bottom latch. Observations revealed that the double doors at Tony's Café and a level fire door in the basement, both separating different components, failed to latch properly. This was confirmed during an exit interview with the Facility Administrator and Director of Maintenance.
The facility was found to be non-compliant with NFPA 70, National Electric Code, as non-GFCI outlets were installed within 6 feet of a sink in the Soiled Linen Room and Chapel Prep Room on the first floor. This was confirmed during an exit interview with the Facility Administrator and Maintenance Director.
The facility was found deficient in providing two remote exits for the basement, as required. The boiler room opened into stair towers on either side, failing to offer the necessary remote egress paths. This was confirmed during an interview with the Facility Administrator and Director of Maintenance.
The facility was found to have a smoke compartment in the C Wing that exceeded the maximum allowable area of 22,500 square feet, as per NFPA 101 standards. This deficiency was confirmed during an observation and document review, affecting one of four smoke compartments.
A facility failed to create a comprehensive care plan for a resident with multiple diagnoses, including rhabdomyolysis and prostate cancer. The resident frequently refused treatments such as ADLs, medication, and therapies, but the care plan did not address these refusals. A nurse confirmed the absence of a relevant care plan, violating facility policies.
A resident with anxiety, hypertension, and acute respiratory failure continued to receive Loratadine 10 mg daily for seasonal allergic rhinitis, despite a pharmacist's recommendation to limit its use to the allergy season. The physician agreed to this recommendation, but the standing order for Loratadine remained without a stop date, as confirmed by the DON.
The facility did not meet the required LPN staffing levels during the night shift on four occasions. With a census of 92 residents, the facility needed 2.30 LPNs but provided fewer: 2.06, 2.14, 2.23, and 1.45 LPNs on different nights. No additional higher-level staff were available to cover the shortfall.
Failure to Maintain Fire Resistance in Common Wall Separations
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain fire resistance in common wall fire separations within one of its components. During an observation on January 27, 2025, between 9:05 a.m. and 9:45 a.m., it was noted that certain fire-rated doors did not positively bottom latch when tested. Specifically, at 9:05 a.m., the double doors on the first floor at Tony's Café, which separate Component 1 from Component 2, failed to latch. Additionally, at 9:45 a.m., the level fire door in the basement, also separating Component 1 from Component 2, did not latch properly. This deficiency was confirmed during an exit interview with the Facility Administrator and Director of Maintenance.
Plan Of Correction
The doors and door hardware will be adjusted so the door will positively latch into the frame. We will continue to inspect for these conditions on our monthly environmental rounds for compliance. The Director of Maintenance will be responsible for maintaining compliance of this inspection.
Non-GFCI Outlets Installed Near Sinks
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to comply with NFPA 70, National Electric Code, specifically Section 210.8(B) 5, which requires ground-fault circuit interrupter (GFCI) protection for outlets installed within 6 feet of a sink. During observations conducted on January 27, 2025, between 9:10 a.m. and 9:25 a.m., it was noted that non-GFCI outlets were installed within 6 feet of a sink in two locations: the Soiled Linen Room on the first floor, C-Wing Green Hall, and the Chapel Prep Room on the first floor. This deficiency was confirmed during an exit interview with the Facility Administrator and the Maintenance Director.
Plan Of Correction
The outlets were replaced with GFCI protected outlets. The Director of Maintenance will be responsible for maintaining compliance with this issue.
Deficiency in Remote Exits for Basement
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure compliance with the requirement of having not less than two approved exits, remote from each other, for each story and smoke compartment. During an observation and document review conducted on January 27, 2025, at 8:30 a.m., it was found that the basement of the facility lacked two remote exits. This deficiency was due to the boiler room opening into the stair towers on either side, which did not provide the necessary remote egress paths. The issue was confirmed during an exit interview with the Facility Administrator and Director of Maintenance at 10:30 a.m. on the same day.
Smoke Compartment Size Exceeds Maximum Allowance
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to comply with the NFPA 101 requirements for smoke compartments, as evidenced by the C Wing smoke zone exceeding the maximum allowable area of 22,500 square feet. This deficiency was identified during an observation and document review conducted on January 27, 2025, at 8:30 a.m. The issue was confirmed during an exit interview with the Facility Administrator and Director of Maintenance later that morning. The deficiency affects one of the four smoke compartments within the facility, indicating a failure to ensure proper subdivision of building spaces for smoke control.
Failure to Develop Comprehensive Care Plan for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop a person-centered comprehensive care plan for a resident, identified as Resident R70, who was admitted with diagnoses including rhabdomyolysis, hypertension, and malignant neoplasm of the prostate. Despite the facility's policy requiring a comprehensive care plan with measurable objectives and time frames, Resident R70's care plan did not address the resident's repeated refusals of various treatments, such as activities of daily living, medication, physical therapy, and occupational therapy, which occurred several times weekly from October 1, 2024, to January 8, 2024. A review of the clinical records and an interview with a licensed nurse confirmed the absence of a care plan addressing these refusals. This deficiency was identified during a survey, as the facility did not meet the requirements outlined in 28 Pa. Code: 211.12 (d) (1) (5) Nursing services and 28 Pa. Code 211.10 (c) Resident care policies.
Plan Of Correction
The Care Plan for Resident R70 was immediately updated on 01/09/2025 to reflect Resident R70's refusals of medications, PT, OT, and Activities of Daily Living. Following the completion of the survey, the care plans for all the current residents were reviewed. Any resident that was refusing medications, treatments, therapies, ADLs, etc., had their care plans updated to reflect these refusals. Upon admission to the facility, refusals of care will be monitored by the Interdisciplinary Team (which would include our nursing, therapy, social service, activities, and dietary team members). The care plans for these residents will reflect any refusals of medications, treatments, therapies, ADLs, etc. The RNAC will be responsible for monitoring the completion of these care plans and review them prior to each resident assessment and care conference.
Failure to Discontinue Unnecessary Medication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs, specifically for a resident diagnosed with anxiety, hypertension, and acute respiratory failure. The resident was receiving Loratadine 10 mg daily for seasonal allergic rhinitis, as noted in the monthly pharmacy review dated October 29, 2024. The pharmacist recommended that the administration of Loratadine should be limited to the allergy season to avoid adverse events from long-term use and suggested a reevaluation of its necessity, possibly considering a trial discontinuation or PRN (as needed) period. Despite the physician agreeing to the pharmacist's recommendation on October 31, 2024, the resident's clinical record showed that the standing order for Loratadine, which began on February 13, 2024, continued without a stop date. This oversight was confirmed during an interview with the Director of Nursing on January 8, 2024, indicating that the medication should have been discontinued as per the pharmacy's recommendation and the physician's response.
Plan Of Correction
On January 9, 2025, Loratadine was discontinued from the profile of Resident R30 as recommended by the Consultant Pharmacist. Going forward, all Pharmacy Consultant reports will now require a review by our Resident Care Coordinators after being scanned into the EMR system to ensure that all recommendations were addressed by the physician and that all orders were followed accordingly. The Director of QI will review the Pharmacy Consultant reports monthly for 6 months to ensure accuracy and then quarterly for 3 months. The Pharmacy Consultant will also inform the Director of Nursing each month that all recommendations from the previous month were addressed appropriately.
LPN Staffing Deficiency During Night Shift
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to meet the regulatory requirement of providing a minimum of one LPN per 40 residents during the night shift on four specific dates. The facility census data indicated that on each of these dates, the census was 92, necessitating 2.30 LPNs for adequate coverage. However, the nursing time schedules revealed that the facility provided fewer LPNs than required: 2.06 LPNs on 11/23/2024, 2.14 LPNs on 11/24/2024, 2.23 LPNs on 11/28/2024, and 1.45 LPNs on 11/29/2024. There were no additional higher-level staff available to compensate for this deficiency, leading to non-compliance with the staffing regulation.
Plan Of Correction
Our Staffing Coordinator in conjunction with our Director of Nursing will monitor our daily census and prepare for any increase in census throughout the day. They will continue to use the staffing tool provided by DOH to ensure compliance with all PPDs and staffing ratios. This tool will be monitored by the Director of Nursing on a daily basis.
Latest citations in Pennsylvania
Failure to provide and document respiratory care: A resident with a trach had no documented evidence of respiratory rate, depth, and quality being monitored each shift and as needed, despite oxygen orders and trach care needs. Other residents with CPAP, nebulizer, and oxygen therapy had respiratory equipment left out of required storage, missing CPAP settings and care details in orders and care plans, and MAR entries signed by nursing staff even when respiratory staff reportedly completed the equipment changes.
Failure to Coordinate Hospice Services in Care Plans: The facility failed to coordinate hospice services with facility services for three residents receiving hospice care. One resident’s care plan did not include hospice needs despite hospice enrollment, and two residents’ comprehensive care plans lacked hospice agency contact information and access to the hospice 24-hour on-call system. The RNAC confirmed the omissions during interview; the residents had diagnoses including HTN, heart failure, kidney disease, diabetes, hypokalemia, and vitamin D deficiency.
Cross contamination occurred during a dressing change when an LPN placed a resident’s foot directly on the wheelchair seat without a barrier and did not clean the bedside table after the procedure. The facility also lacked infection surveillance documentation for several months, and its Legionella water management plan was incomplete, with no mapping of high-risk areas, no temperature logs, and no documented preventive measures for unused areas.
Failure to implement an antibiotic stewardship program. The facility’s infection control policy stated that antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use would be part of the infection control program, but the Infection Control Program lacked documented evidence of antibiotic monitoring or review of appropriate antibiotic use for 3 months. The RN IP stated she had taken over the program, was also supervising the building, and had not been able to complete the program work or review the binders; administration confirmed the lapse.
Failure to Use Resident’s Preferred Name: A resident with HTN, anxiety, and depression had a preferred name documented in the care plan and MDS, but the name tag at the room entrance did not reflect that preference. When staff greeted the resident using the name on the door, the resident stated she did not like being called that and gave her preferred name. Staff interviews confirmed the preferred name was not listed at the door, and the ADON and DON acknowledged the omission.
A resident's confidential medical information was left visible on the East med cart computer screen at the nurses station when the cart was unattended. An RN confirmed the observation and acknowledged that resident personal and clinical information was exposed to anyone passing by.
The facility failed to provide written bed-hold policy notice to two residents or their representatives during hospital transfers. One resident had HTN, kidney disease, and hypokalemia, and another had hyperlipidemia, CHF, and a right femur fracture; records showed hospital transfers, but no documentation that the required bed-hold information was given at the time of transfer.
Failure to monitor weight and individualize nutrition care plans: one resident did not have a required monthly weight recorded, despite facility policy requiring monthly weights by the 7th day of each month, and two residents had care plans that did not reflect their specific nutritional needs. One resident had dx including HTN, PVD, and a thyroid disorder with orders for a renal diet, mechanical soft texture, and Magic Cup BID, while another resident had documented significant wt loss, a regular lactose-free diet, and nutritional juice with meals. Staff confirmed the missing weight and the lack of individualized care plan interventions.
Unlocked treatment cart and improper medication storage were observed in multiple areas. An unlocked, unattended treatment cart was found in a hallway, and the East Medication Room contained personal items mixed with medication supplies. Opened Tubersol vials in two refrigerators and multiple opened meds in the A Hall and C Hall medication carts were not dated, and an LPN confirmed several of the findings.
Failure to Maintain a Qualified Infection Preventionist: The facility did not maintain a consistent qualified onsite IP responsible for infection prevention and control for one month after the former IP resigned. An RN assumed the role while also supervising the building, reported limited time to perform the duties, and could not produce a certificate for completion of the Nursing Home Infection Preventionist Training Course.
Failure to Provide and Document Respiratory Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure appropriate respiratory care was provided and documented for residents with tracheostomy, oxygen, CPAP, and nebulizer needs. Facility policy required respiratory treatments and equipment care to be based on physician orders, care plans, and diagnoses, and required documentation of services provided, including date, time, and the name and title of the person providing care. The respiratory therapy job description stated respiratory staff assumed primary responsibility for respiratory care modalities, conducted therapeutic procedures, maintained resident records, and documented patient care services. Resident R3 had diagnoses including traumatic brain injury and respiratory failure and had a physician order for oxygen at 10 liters per minute continuously, titrated to maintain oxygen saturation above 90%. The resident’s MDS indicated tracheostomy care was required. During observation, R3 was receiving oxygen via face mask to the trach and pulse and oxygen saturation were being monitored. However, review of the clinical record failed to show evidence that the resident’s respiratory rate, depth, and quality were monitored and documented each shift and as needed. Staff interviews confirmed that nurses were responsible for reviewing care plans, monitoring respiratory status, and documenting changes, and that the facility failed to document and monitor R3’s respiratory rate, depth, and quality each shift and as needed. Resident R67 had obstructive sleep apnea, heart failure, and diabetes, with an order for CPAP at hour of sleep at home settings. The order did not include the setting or any care for the CPAP machine, and the care plan also did not include the CPAP settings or care needed for the machine. During observation, the resident’s CPAP mask was sitting on top of the bedside stand and was not stored in a bag as required. Resident R69 had emphysema and was ordered albuterol nebulizer treatments four times a day, but during observation the handheld nebulizer was sitting on top of the machine and not stored in a bag as required. Resident R11 and Resident R32 both had oxygen therapy orders requiring nasal cannula changes every two weeks, but the MAR showed changes documented by nursing staff while interviews confirmed respiratory staff actually performed the changes and that staff signed off even when they had not personally completed the task. The interviews also reflected confusion about who was responsible for the equipment changes and documentation.
Failure to Coordinate Hospice Services in Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure coordination of hospice services with facility services to meet the end-of-life care needs of three residents. Review of the facility’s hospice policy showed that coordinated care plans for residents receiving hospice services were to include the most recent hospice plan of care and the care and services provided by the facility. For Resident R9, the record showed admission to hospice with a diagnosis of hypertensive heart disease, and the MDS indicated hospice care was received while a resident; however, the current care plan did not include a hospice care plan. During interview, the RNAC confirmed the facility failed to implement a care plan for Resident R9’s hospice needs. For Resident R24 and Resident R78, the records showed physician orders to admit each resident to hospice services. Their current comprehensive care plans did not include coordination details for hospice services, including contact information for the hospice agency or how to access the hospice’s 24-hour on-call system. During interview, the RNAC confirmed the facility failed to include this information in the plan of care and failed to ensure coordination of hospice services with facility services for these residents. Resident R24’s diagnoses included high blood pressure, kidney disease, and hypokalemia, and Resident R78’s diagnoses included high blood pressure, kidney disease, and vitamin D deficiency.
Cross Contamination During Dressing Change and Infection Control Program Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
Cross contamination occurred during a dressing change for Resident R24. The resident was admitted to the facility and had diagnoses including peripheral vascular disease and diabetes. A physician order dated 4/27/26 directed the right lateral foot to be cleansed with normal saline, patted dry, treated with Santyl ointment, and covered with a dry dressing daily and as needed. During observation of the dressing change on 5/5/26, the LPN prepared a clean area on the resident’s over-bed table with a barrier and supplies, cleansed the foot, then placed the resident’s right foot directly on the wheelchair seat without placing a barrier before applying the ointment and dressing. After the dressing was completed, the LPN gathered and discarded supplies, removed the barrier from the over-bed table, and exited the room. During interview, the LPN confirmed that a clean barrier had not been placed on the wheelchair seat before the resident’s foot was placed there and confirmed that the bedside table was not cleaned after the supplies and barrier were removed. The LPN also confirmed the failure to prevent cross contamination during the dressing change. The facility also failed to maintain infection control surveillance for three months, as the infection control documentation did not show tracking of resident infections for February 2026, March 2026, and April 2026. When asked about the surveillance system, the RN who had taken over the program stated she had not done anything since taking over on 4/4/26 and had not looked at the infection control binders. The NHA confirmed the facility failed to implement an infection control program that included a system of surveillance to identify possible communicable diseases or infections for those months. In addition, the facility’s Legionella water management plan lacked mapping of high-opportunity areas, water temperature logs, and evidence of preventive measures for areas not in use, and staff could not provide logs or explain required temperatures during interviews.
Failure to Implement Antibiotic Stewardship Program
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program for 3 of 10 months, specifically February 2026, March 2026, and April 2026. The facility’s Infection Control Plan, Program and Committee policy, last reviewed on 1/6/26, stated that an antibiotic stewardship program would be part of the overall infection control program and that antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use would be implemented. However, review of the Infection Control Program for February 2026, March 2026, and April 2026 found no documented evidence that antibiotic monitoring or review of appropriate antibiotic use was completed. During a telephonic interview on 5/6/26, the RN infection preventionist stated she took over the Infection Control program on 4/4/26, was also supervising the building, had only been looking at records for reportable issues, had not been able to do the program since starting, and had not seen the binders. Nursing home administration confirmed during an interview on 5/6/26 that the facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program for those 3 months.
Failure to Use Resident’s Preferred Name
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to treat a resident with respect by not addressing the resident by the preferred name. Review of the resident’s care plan showed the name the resident preferred to be called, and the MDS also documented that preferred name. The resident had diagnoses of high blood pressure, anxiety, and depression. During an observation and interview, the resident’s name tag at the entrance of the room did not show the preferred name, and when the resident was greeted using the name listed on the door, the resident stated she did not like being called that and stated the preferred name. Staff interviews confirmed that residents are asked about name preferences on admission and that preferred nicknames are included in the care plan, but the Activities Director was unsure who was responsible for ensuring the preferred name was listed at the door. A nurse aide stated nurses are usually responsible for placing the name tag at the entrance of the door, though aides sometimes do it. Subsequent observations confirmed the preferred name was still not listed on the door, and the ADON and DON both confirmed that the resident’s preferred name choice was not listed at the entrance of the door.
Failure to Protect Confidential Resident Information
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain the confidentiality of a resident's medical information on the East Medication Cart. Facility policy titled Quality of Life - Dignity, dated 1/6/26, stated that staff shall maintain an environment in which confidential clinical information is protected. During an observation on 5/4/26 at 11:38 a.m., the East Medication Cart at the nurses station was left unattended with the computer screen open, and identifiable resident personal and confidential information was visible to anyone passing by. During an interview at the same time, RN Employee E9 confirmed the observation and acknowledged that the facility failed to maintain the confidentiality of residents' medical information.
Failure to Notify Residents of Bed-Hold Policy During Hospital Transfers
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify the resident or the resident’s representative of its bed-hold policy for two hospital transfers. Facility policy stated that at the time of transfer for hospitalization or therapeutic leave, the facility would provide written notice explaining the duration of the bed-hold policy and information about the resident’s return to the next available bed, and that in an emergency transfer the notice would be provided within 24 hours. For Resident R24, who had diagnoses including high blood pressure, kidney disease, and hypokalemia, the record showed a hospital transfer on 3/31/26 and return on 4/5/26, but there was no documented evidence that written bed-hold information was provided at the time of transfer. For Closed Resident Record CR87, the record showed diagnoses including hyperlipidemia, congestive heart failure, and a right femur fracture. On 2/6/26, staff received venous doppler results indicating a nonocclusive thrombus in the right common femoral vein, relayed the results to the CRNP, and obtained orders to increase Eliquis temporarily and repeat an ultrasound. After the resident’s daughter called and staff reported the situation to the CRNP, the resident was sent to the hospital around 5:50 p.m. The emergency room transfer form and the clinical record did not include documented evidence that CR87 or the representative were provided written information about the facility’s bed-hold policy at the time of transfer.
Failure to Monitor Weight and Individualize Nutrition Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to properly monitor weight and nutrition status for two residents. For one resident, no monthly weight was recorded for April 2026, even though the facility policy required monthly weights to be obtained by the 7th day of each month and documented in the electronic medical record. That resident’s record showed diagnoses of high blood pressure, PVD, and a thyroid disorder, and the physician had ordered a renal diet, mechanical soft ground meat texture with a low fat diet for low protein, and Magic Cup twice daily for additional nutrition. A nurse aide confirmed that the monthly weight was not obtained. The facility also failed to individualize care plans to address resident-specific nutritional concerns for two residents. For one resident, the care plan identified potential nutritional problems related to dysphagia and the need for a mechanically altered and therapeutic diet, but it did not include resident-specific interventions for the ordered renal diet, mechanical soft diet, or supplements. For the second resident, the MDS indicated a 5% or greater weight loss in the last month or 10% or greater in 6 months, and the resident was not on a physician-prescribed weight loss regimen. That resident had orders for a regular lactose-free diet and nutritional juice with meals, but the care plan only included a general intervention to serve the diet as ordered and did not address the weight loss or the ordered diet and supplement needs. An RNAC confirmed the care plans were not individualized for these nutritional concerns.
Unlocked Treatment Cart and Improper Medication Storage
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to properly secure a treatment cart while it was not in use and failed to properly store medications in the East Medication Room, the A Hall Medication Cart, and the C Hall Medication Cart. Facility policies reviewed indicated medication carts are to be kept closed and locked when out of sight of the medication nurse, and compartments containing drugs and biologicals are to be locked when not in use. The policy also stated that when opening a multi-dose container, the date opened shall be recorded on the container. During an observation on the East side, the treatment cart was found in the hallway near a room, unlocked and unattended. An LPN confirmed the cart had been left unlocked and unattended. In the East Medication Room, surveyors observed personal items and clothing stored with medication-related supplies, including cups, a tote bag, sweaters, pants, blankets, wheelchair cushions, and leg rest bags. The East first hall and second hall refrigerators each contained two opened vials of Tubersol solution that were not labeled with a date. In the A Hall Medication Cart, surveyors observed opened Nystatin liquid, Latanoprost eye drops, and a Trelegy Ellipta inhaler that were not dated, along with a coffee cup, pastry, sliced red peppers, and a personal cell phone in the cart compartment; an LPN confirmed the items belonged to her. In the C Hall Medication Cart, surveyors observed opened Robitussin cough suppressant, Milk of Magnesia, Miralax powder, and lactulose liquid that were not labeled with a date, and an LPN confirmed the findings.
Failure to Maintain a Qualified Infection Preventionist
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to designate a consistent qualified individual onsite who was responsible for implementing programs and activities to prevent and control infections for one of 10 months, identified as April 2026. The facility’s Infection Control Plan, Program and Committee policy, last reviewed on 1/6/26, stated that the designated Infection Preventionist is responsible for oversight of the infection control program and serves as a consultant to staff on infectious diseases, resident room placement, isolation precautions, staff and resident exposures, and surveillance and epidemiological investigations. During interviews, Human Resource staff stated that the former Infection Preventionist resigned, with the last day of employment on 4/4/26. A Registered Nurse who took over the infection control program stated she assumed the role on 4/4/26, was also supervising the building, looked at records to see if any were reportable, and had not been able to fully do the work since starting, estimating about 12 hours per week. She also stated that her infection control training and certification had been completed long ago and she would need to find it. Review of the facility-provided certification courses showed training completed in 2022, but there was no certificate for completion of the Nursing Home Infection Preventionist Training Course. Nursing Home Administration confirmed the facility failed to designate a consistent qualified individual onsite responsible for infection prevention and control during that month.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release June 24, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
Trusted by long-term care providers and associations.
