Pavilion At Brmc, The
Inspection history, citations, penalties and survey trends for this long-term care facility in Bradford, Pennsylvania.
- Location
- 200 Pleasant Street, Bradford, Pennsylvania 16701
- CMS Provider Number
- 395355
- Inspections on file
- 18
- Latest survey
- April 23, 2026
- Citations (last 12 mo.)
- 8
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Pavilion At Brmc, The during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to ensure the attending physician documented required monthly visits with signed and dated progress notes for four residents. Records for residents with diagnoses including dementia, bipolar disorder, functional quadriplegia, conversion disorder, GERD, anxiety, and HTN showed extended gaps with no physician progress notes, and the NHA confirmed the missing documentation during interview.
Improper Storage of Treatment Ice Packs with Food: A CNA was observed confirming that two ice packs used for resident treatments were stored in the Third Floor freezer next to frozen microwave meals. The CNA stated that treatment ice packs should not be stored in the same unit with food.
MDS assessments were inaccurately coded for three residents regarding wander/elopement alarm use. Each resident had a physician order for a wanderguard bracelet to be worn at all times, and TARs showed staff checked bracelet placement every shift, but the MDS P0200E item was coded as Not Used instead of Used Daily. The RN Assessment Coordinator confirmed the coding error.
A resident with Alzheimer's and other health issues was left unattended in the bathroom during a shift change, despite requiring substantial assistance for toileting. The resident was later found on the floor with injuries, including a neck fracture. Staff interviews confirmed that leaving residents unattended in the bathroom was against facility practice.
A resident with Alzheimer's and other health issues was left unattended in the bathroom by a nurse aide during a shift change, despite requiring substantial assistance for toileting. The resident was later found on the floor with a neck fracture. Staff interviews confirmed the resident was left unattended, contrary to facility policy.
Missing Physician Progress Notes for Required Visits
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the attending physician documented required monthly visits by writing, signing, and dating a progress note for each visit for four of 14 residents reviewed. Facility policy stated that attending physicians were to visit residents once monthly and document a progress note related to the visit. Review of clinical records showed that Resident R1, who had diagnoses including dementia, Wernicke encephalopathy, and high blood pressure, had physician progress notes dated and signed on several dates, but the record lacked evidence of any physician progress notes between 10/23/24 and 7/16/25, a nine-month period. Resident R2, with diagnoses including bipolar disorder, obstructive and reflux uropathy, and functional quadriplegia, had a last physician progress note dated and signed on 9/28/25, with no evidence of any physician progress notes between that date and 4/23/26. Resident R6, diagnosed with conversion disorder, GERD, and high blood pressure, also had no physician progress notes between 9/18/25 and 4/23/26. Resident R30, with diagnoses including dementia, anxiety, and high blood pressure, had no physician progress notes between 6/17/25 and 4/23/26. During interview, the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the records for these residents lacked the required physician progress notes at the time of review.
Improper Storage of Treatment Ice Packs with Food
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain sanitary operations and food safety standards in one of two resident unit freezers reviewed on the Third Floor. During observation, two ice packs used for resident treatments were found stored in the freezer next to frozen microwave meals. During interview, a CNA confirmed that the ice packs used as treatments for residents were in the freezer with food and stated that ice packs used as treatments should not be stored in the same unit with food.
MDS Assessments Incorrectly Coded for Wander/Elopement Alarm Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that MDS assessments accurately reflected the use of wander/elopement alarms for three of 14 residents reviewed. MDS instructions for section P0200E required all alarms used during the seven-day look-back period to be coded by frequency of use, including devices such as wanderguard bracelets worn by the resident. For Resident R1, who had diagnoses including dementia, Wernicke encephalopathy, and high blood pressure, the clinical record showed a physician’s order for a wanderguard bracelet to be worn at all times, and TARs for February 2025, August 2025, and March 2026 showed staff checked the bracelet placement every shift, yet quarterly MDS assessments for those periods coded P0200E as Not Used. Resident R6, who had diagnoses including conversion disorder, GERD, and high blood pressure, also had a physician’s order for a wanderguard bracelet to be worn at all times. TARs showed the bracelet placement was checked every shift during February 2025, portions of August 2025, and February 2026, but the quarterly, significant change, and quarterly MDS assessments for those periods coded P0200E as Not Used. Resident R10, who had diagnoses including dementia, diabetes, and high blood pressure, had a physician’s order for a wanderguard bracelet to be worn at all times, and TARs showed the bracelet placement was checked every shift during September 2025 and March 2026, but the quarterly MDS assessments for those periods also coded P0200E as Not Used. During interview, the RN Assessment Coordinator confirmed the MDSs for these residents were coded incorrectly and should have been coded as Used Daily.
Resident Neglect Due to Unattended Bathroom Incident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident, identified as Resident R5, was free from neglect during care. Resident R5, who had a history of Alzheimer's Disease, major depressive disorder, seizures, muscle weakness, hearing loss, chronic pain, history of falling, age-related physical debility, and macular degeneration, required substantial assistance for toileting. The resident's care plan indicated a need for extensive assistance from one to two staff members for toilet use and transfers. On the day of the incident, a Nurse Aide (NA) assisted Resident R5 to the restroom and left the resident unattended on the toilet during a shift change. The NA informed the incoming staff that Resident R5 was in the bathroom and needed assistance but then left the facility. The incoming staff acknowledged the information but did not immediately assist the resident. As a result, Resident R5 was found on the bathroom floor with bruising and a swollen knee, and was later diagnosed with a type 2 dens fracture. Interviews with staff confirmed that it was not the practice to leave residents unattended in the bathroom, and that staff should monitor residents for safety. The Director of Nursing (DON) and Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) confirmed that the resident was left unattended, leading to the fall and subsequent injury. The facility's policies on resident care and fall prevention were not adhered to, resulting in neglect of Resident R5's needs.
Plan Of Correction
What corrective actions will be accomplished for those residents found to have been affected by the deficient practice? On 9/27/24, The DON (Director of Nursing) met with Employee 1, Employee 2 and the staff on 2nd floor and educated them not to leave Resident R5 on the toilet unattended. The residents care plan was reviewed and updated to reflect new toileting status. How will you identify other residents having the potential to be affected by the same deficient practice and what corrective action will be taken? All residents with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of less than eight (8) have the potential to be impacted. On 10/16/2024 the facility completed staff training regarding the safety risks associated with leaving residents unattended while on the toilet. A whole house resident BIMS audit was completed by the DON on 12/17/2024 to identify residents considered to have severe impairment (a BIMS score of 0-7). Any current resident, new admissions, or resident reviewed during the care planning process identified with a BIMS of 0-7 will have their care plans updated to reflect supervision while on the toilet. What measures will be put into place or what system changes will you make to ensure that the deficient practice does not recur? The facility will identify those residents with severe impairment and the DON will place a GOLD star on the nameplate outside of the resident room and with a GOLD star above the resident bed. The facility will update the Fall Prevention and Investigation Policy to reflect the addition of the star. Whole house staff education on the change will be completed by the DON. The updated fall policy will be reviewed during our New Employee Orientation. The facility will continue to monitor its fall prevention program during weekly fall prevention meetings to ensure proper fall prevention procedures are in line with the facility fall protocol to include utilizing the stars on the door nameplate and above the headboard. The facility will continue to provide staff education on Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation of Property through our online education portal while also offering an in-person Abuse education on January 14th, 2025 provided by the Pavilion's Social Service Director and on February 25th, 2025 with the Department of Human Services Area Agency on Aging. How the corrective action will be monitored to ensure that the deficient practice will not recur: i.e., what quality assurance programs will be accomplished? The prior week's resident fall event reports will be audited at the weekly fall prevention meeting to assess for resident care plan compliance and if modifications are needed. Audit results will be reported at the facility Quality Assurance Performance Improvement and Kaleida Health Quality Improvement Patient Safety monthly committees. Weekly audits will continue until 12 consecutive weeks of 90% compliance has been achieved. Modification may be made to the plan of correction to improve compliance. Changes will be reported to the facility QAPI monthly meeting.
Resident Left Unattended in Bathroom Resulting in Fall and Neck Fracture
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate supervision for a resident during toileting, resulting in a fall and a fracture of the neck. The resident, who had a history of Alzheimer's Disease, major depressive disorder, seizures, muscle weakness, hearing loss, chronic pain, history of falling, age-related physical debility, and macular degeneration, required substantial assistance for toileting. Despite these needs, the resident was left unattended in the restroom by a nurse aide during a shift change. The incident occurred when the nurse aide assisted the resident onto the toilet and then left the resident unattended, informing the incoming staff that the resident was in the bathroom and needed assistance. The incoming staff acknowledged this information, but the resident was later found on the floor by another nurse aide, having sustained bruising and a significant neck injury. The resident was subsequently sent to the emergency room for evaluation and treatment. Interviews with staff confirmed that the resident was left unattended, which was against the facility's practice of ensuring residents are monitored in the restroom for safety. The facility's policy on fall prevention was not adhered to, leading to the resident's fall and injury. The deficiency was confirmed through staff interviews and a review of the resident's care plan and clinical records.
Plan Of Correction
- What corrective actions will be accomplished for those residents found to have been affected by the deficient practice? On 9/27/24, The DON (Director of Nursing) met with Employee 1, Employee 2 and the staff on 2nd floor and educated them not to leave Resident R5 on the toilet unattended. The residents care plan was reviewed and updated to reflect new toileting status. - How will you identify other residents having the potential to be affected by the same deficient practice and what corrective action will be taken? All residents with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of less than eight (8) have the potential to be impacted. On 10/16/2024 the facility completed staff training regarding the safety risks associated with leaving residents unattended while on the toilet. A whole house resident BIMS audit was completed by the DON on 12/17/2024 to identify residents considered to have severe impairment (a BIMS score of 0-7). Any current resident, new admissions, or resident reviewed during the care planning process identified with a BIMS of 0-7 will have their care plans updated to reflect supervision while on the toilet. - What measures will be put into place or what system changes will you make to ensure that the deficient practice does not recur? The facility will identify those residents with severe impairment and the DON will place a GOLD star on the nameplate outside of the resident room and with a GOLD star above the resident bed. The facility will update the Fall Prevention and Investigation Policy to reflect the addition of the star. Whole house staff education on the change will be completed by the DON. The updated fall policy will be reviewed during our New Employee Orientation. The facility will continue to monitor its fall prevention program during weekly fall prevention meetings to ensure proper fall prevention procedures are in line with the facility fall protocol to include utilizing the stars on the door nameplate and above the headboard. The facility will continue to provide staff education on Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation of Property through our online education portal while also offering an in-person Abuse education on January 14th, 2025 provided by the Pavilion's Social Service Director and on February 25th, 2025 with the Department of Human Services Area Agency on Aging. - How the corrective action will be monitored to ensure that the deficient practice will not recur: i.e., what quality assurance programs will be accomplished? The prior week's resident fall event reports will be audited at the weekly fall prevention meeting to assess for resident care plan compliance and if modifications are needed. Audit results will be reported at the facility Quality Assurance Performance Improvement and Kaleida Health Quality Improvement Patient Safety monthly committees. Weekly audits will continue until 12 consecutive weeks of 90% compliance has been achieved. Modification may be made to the plan of correction to improve compliance. Changes will be reported to the facility QAPI monthly meeting.
Latest citations in Pennsylvania
Failure to provide and document respiratory care: A resident with a trach had no documented evidence of respiratory rate, depth, and quality being monitored each shift and as needed, despite oxygen orders and trach care needs. Other residents with CPAP, nebulizer, and oxygen therapy had respiratory equipment left out of required storage, missing CPAP settings and care details in orders and care plans, and MAR entries signed by nursing staff even when respiratory staff reportedly completed the equipment changes.
Failure to Coordinate Hospice Services in Care Plans: The facility failed to coordinate hospice services with facility services for three residents receiving hospice care. One resident’s care plan did not include hospice needs despite hospice enrollment, and two residents’ comprehensive care plans lacked hospice agency contact information and access to the hospice 24-hour on-call system. The RNAC confirmed the omissions during interview; the residents had diagnoses including HTN, heart failure, kidney disease, diabetes, hypokalemia, and vitamin D deficiency.
Cross contamination occurred during a dressing change when an LPN placed a resident’s foot directly on the wheelchair seat without a barrier and did not clean the bedside table after the procedure. The facility also lacked infection surveillance documentation for several months, and its Legionella water management plan was incomplete, with no mapping of high-risk areas, no temperature logs, and no documented preventive measures for unused areas.
Failure to implement an antibiotic stewardship program. The facility’s infection control policy stated that antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use would be part of the infection control program, but the Infection Control Program lacked documented evidence of antibiotic monitoring or review of appropriate antibiotic use for 3 months. The RN IP stated she had taken over the program, was also supervising the building, and had not been able to complete the program work or review the binders; administration confirmed the lapse.
Failure to Use Resident’s Preferred Name: A resident with HTN, anxiety, and depression had a preferred name documented in the care plan and MDS, but the name tag at the room entrance did not reflect that preference. When staff greeted the resident using the name on the door, the resident stated she did not like being called that and gave her preferred name. Staff interviews confirmed the preferred name was not listed at the door, and the ADON and DON acknowledged the omission.
A resident's confidential medical information was left visible on the East med cart computer screen at the nurses station when the cart was unattended. An RN confirmed the observation and acknowledged that resident personal and clinical information was exposed to anyone passing by.
The facility failed to provide written bed-hold policy notice to two residents or their representatives during hospital transfers. One resident had HTN, kidney disease, and hypokalemia, and another had hyperlipidemia, CHF, and a right femur fracture; records showed hospital transfers, but no documentation that the required bed-hold information was given at the time of transfer.
Failure to monitor weight and individualize nutrition care plans: one resident did not have a required monthly weight recorded, despite facility policy requiring monthly weights by the 7th day of each month, and two residents had care plans that did not reflect their specific nutritional needs. One resident had dx including HTN, PVD, and a thyroid disorder with orders for a renal diet, mechanical soft texture, and Magic Cup BID, while another resident had documented significant wt loss, a regular lactose-free diet, and nutritional juice with meals. Staff confirmed the missing weight and the lack of individualized care plan interventions.
Unlocked treatment cart and improper medication storage were observed in multiple areas. An unlocked, unattended treatment cart was found in a hallway, and the East Medication Room contained personal items mixed with medication supplies. Opened Tubersol vials in two refrigerators and multiple opened meds in the A Hall and C Hall medication carts were not dated, and an LPN confirmed several of the findings.
Failure to Maintain a Qualified Infection Preventionist: The facility did not maintain a consistent qualified onsite IP responsible for infection prevention and control for one month after the former IP resigned. An RN assumed the role while also supervising the building, reported limited time to perform the duties, and could not produce a certificate for completion of the Nursing Home Infection Preventionist Training Course.
Failure to Provide and Document Respiratory Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure appropriate respiratory care was provided and documented for residents with tracheostomy, oxygen, CPAP, and nebulizer needs. Facility policy required respiratory treatments and equipment care to be based on physician orders, care plans, and diagnoses, and required documentation of services provided, including date, time, and the name and title of the person providing care. The respiratory therapy job description stated respiratory staff assumed primary responsibility for respiratory care modalities, conducted therapeutic procedures, maintained resident records, and documented patient care services. Resident R3 had diagnoses including traumatic brain injury and respiratory failure and had a physician order for oxygen at 10 liters per minute continuously, titrated to maintain oxygen saturation above 90%. The resident’s MDS indicated tracheostomy care was required. During observation, R3 was receiving oxygen via face mask to the trach and pulse and oxygen saturation were being monitored. However, review of the clinical record failed to show evidence that the resident’s respiratory rate, depth, and quality were monitored and documented each shift and as needed. Staff interviews confirmed that nurses were responsible for reviewing care plans, monitoring respiratory status, and documenting changes, and that the facility failed to document and monitor R3’s respiratory rate, depth, and quality each shift and as needed. Resident R67 had obstructive sleep apnea, heart failure, and diabetes, with an order for CPAP at hour of sleep at home settings. The order did not include the setting or any care for the CPAP machine, and the care plan also did not include the CPAP settings or care needed for the machine. During observation, the resident’s CPAP mask was sitting on top of the bedside stand and was not stored in a bag as required. Resident R69 had emphysema and was ordered albuterol nebulizer treatments four times a day, but during observation the handheld nebulizer was sitting on top of the machine and not stored in a bag as required. Resident R11 and Resident R32 both had oxygen therapy orders requiring nasal cannula changes every two weeks, but the MAR showed changes documented by nursing staff while interviews confirmed respiratory staff actually performed the changes and that staff signed off even when they had not personally completed the task. The interviews also reflected confusion about who was responsible for the equipment changes and documentation.
Failure to Coordinate Hospice Services in Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure coordination of hospice services with facility services to meet the end-of-life care needs of three residents. Review of the facility’s hospice policy showed that coordinated care plans for residents receiving hospice services were to include the most recent hospice plan of care and the care and services provided by the facility. For Resident R9, the record showed admission to hospice with a diagnosis of hypertensive heart disease, and the MDS indicated hospice care was received while a resident; however, the current care plan did not include a hospice care plan. During interview, the RNAC confirmed the facility failed to implement a care plan for Resident R9’s hospice needs. For Resident R24 and Resident R78, the records showed physician orders to admit each resident to hospice services. Their current comprehensive care plans did not include coordination details for hospice services, including contact information for the hospice agency or how to access the hospice’s 24-hour on-call system. During interview, the RNAC confirmed the facility failed to include this information in the plan of care and failed to ensure coordination of hospice services with facility services for these residents. Resident R24’s diagnoses included high blood pressure, kidney disease, and hypokalemia, and Resident R78’s diagnoses included high blood pressure, kidney disease, and vitamin D deficiency.
Cross Contamination During Dressing Change and Infection Control Program Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
Cross contamination occurred during a dressing change for Resident R24. The resident was admitted to the facility and had diagnoses including peripheral vascular disease and diabetes. A physician order dated 4/27/26 directed the right lateral foot to be cleansed with normal saline, patted dry, treated with Santyl ointment, and covered with a dry dressing daily and as needed. During observation of the dressing change on 5/5/26, the LPN prepared a clean area on the resident’s over-bed table with a barrier and supplies, cleansed the foot, then placed the resident’s right foot directly on the wheelchair seat without placing a barrier before applying the ointment and dressing. After the dressing was completed, the LPN gathered and discarded supplies, removed the barrier from the over-bed table, and exited the room. During interview, the LPN confirmed that a clean barrier had not been placed on the wheelchair seat before the resident’s foot was placed there and confirmed that the bedside table was not cleaned after the supplies and barrier were removed. The LPN also confirmed the failure to prevent cross contamination during the dressing change. The facility also failed to maintain infection control surveillance for three months, as the infection control documentation did not show tracking of resident infections for February 2026, March 2026, and April 2026. When asked about the surveillance system, the RN who had taken over the program stated she had not done anything since taking over on 4/4/26 and had not looked at the infection control binders. The NHA confirmed the facility failed to implement an infection control program that included a system of surveillance to identify possible communicable diseases or infections for those months. In addition, the facility’s Legionella water management plan lacked mapping of high-opportunity areas, water temperature logs, and evidence of preventive measures for areas not in use, and staff could not provide logs or explain required temperatures during interviews.
Failure to Implement Antibiotic Stewardship Program
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program for 3 of 10 months, specifically February 2026, March 2026, and April 2026. The facility’s Infection Control Plan, Program and Committee policy, last reviewed on 1/6/26, stated that an antibiotic stewardship program would be part of the overall infection control program and that antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use would be implemented. However, review of the Infection Control Program for February 2026, March 2026, and April 2026 found no documented evidence that antibiotic monitoring or review of appropriate antibiotic use was completed. During a telephonic interview on 5/6/26, the RN infection preventionist stated she took over the Infection Control program on 4/4/26, was also supervising the building, had only been looking at records for reportable issues, had not been able to do the program since starting, and had not seen the binders. Nursing home administration confirmed during an interview on 5/6/26 that the facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program for those 3 months.
Failure to Use Resident’s Preferred Name
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to treat a resident with respect by not addressing the resident by the preferred name. Review of the resident’s care plan showed the name the resident preferred to be called, and the MDS also documented that preferred name. The resident had diagnoses of high blood pressure, anxiety, and depression. During an observation and interview, the resident’s name tag at the entrance of the room did not show the preferred name, and when the resident was greeted using the name listed on the door, the resident stated she did not like being called that and stated the preferred name. Staff interviews confirmed that residents are asked about name preferences on admission and that preferred nicknames are included in the care plan, but the Activities Director was unsure who was responsible for ensuring the preferred name was listed at the door. A nurse aide stated nurses are usually responsible for placing the name tag at the entrance of the door, though aides sometimes do it. Subsequent observations confirmed the preferred name was still not listed on the door, and the ADON and DON both confirmed that the resident’s preferred name choice was not listed at the entrance of the door.
Failure to Protect Confidential Resident Information
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain the confidentiality of a resident's medical information on the East Medication Cart. Facility policy titled Quality of Life - Dignity, dated 1/6/26, stated that staff shall maintain an environment in which confidential clinical information is protected. During an observation on 5/4/26 at 11:38 a.m., the East Medication Cart at the nurses station was left unattended with the computer screen open, and identifiable resident personal and confidential information was visible to anyone passing by. During an interview at the same time, RN Employee E9 confirmed the observation and acknowledged that the facility failed to maintain the confidentiality of residents' medical information.
Failure to Notify Residents of Bed-Hold Policy During Hospital Transfers
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify the resident or the resident’s representative of its bed-hold policy for two hospital transfers. Facility policy stated that at the time of transfer for hospitalization or therapeutic leave, the facility would provide written notice explaining the duration of the bed-hold policy and information about the resident’s return to the next available bed, and that in an emergency transfer the notice would be provided within 24 hours. For Resident R24, who had diagnoses including high blood pressure, kidney disease, and hypokalemia, the record showed a hospital transfer on 3/31/26 and return on 4/5/26, but there was no documented evidence that written bed-hold information was provided at the time of transfer. For Closed Resident Record CR87, the record showed diagnoses including hyperlipidemia, congestive heart failure, and a right femur fracture. On 2/6/26, staff received venous doppler results indicating a nonocclusive thrombus in the right common femoral vein, relayed the results to the CRNP, and obtained orders to increase Eliquis temporarily and repeat an ultrasound. After the resident’s daughter called and staff reported the situation to the CRNP, the resident was sent to the hospital around 5:50 p.m. The emergency room transfer form and the clinical record did not include documented evidence that CR87 or the representative were provided written information about the facility’s bed-hold policy at the time of transfer.
Failure to Monitor Weight and Individualize Nutrition Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to properly monitor weight and nutrition status for two residents. For one resident, no monthly weight was recorded for April 2026, even though the facility policy required monthly weights to be obtained by the 7th day of each month and documented in the electronic medical record. That resident’s record showed diagnoses of high blood pressure, PVD, and a thyroid disorder, and the physician had ordered a renal diet, mechanical soft ground meat texture with a low fat diet for low protein, and Magic Cup twice daily for additional nutrition. A nurse aide confirmed that the monthly weight was not obtained. The facility also failed to individualize care plans to address resident-specific nutritional concerns for two residents. For one resident, the care plan identified potential nutritional problems related to dysphagia and the need for a mechanically altered and therapeutic diet, but it did not include resident-specific interventions for the ordered renal diet, mechanical soft diet, or supplements. For the second resident, the MDS indicated a 5% or greater weight loss in the last month or 10% or greater in 6 months, and the resident was not on a physician-prescribed weight loss regimen. That resident had orders for a regular lactose-free diet and nutritional juice with meals, but the care plan only included a general intervention to serve the diet as ordered and did not address the weight loss or the ordered diet and supplement needs. An RNAC confirmed the care plans were not individualized for these nutritional concerns.
Unlocked Treatment Cart and Improper Medication Storage
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to properly secure a treatment cart while it was not in use and failed to properly store medications in the East Medication Room, the A Hall Medication Cart, and the C Hall Medication Cart. Facility policies reviewed indicated medication carts are to be kept closed and locked when out of sight of the medication nurse, and compartments containing drugs and biologicals are to be locked when not in use. The policy also stated that when opening a multi-dose container, the date opened shall be recorded on the container. During an observation on the East side, the treatment cart was found in the hallway near a room, unlocked and unattended. An LPN confirmed the cart had been left unlocked and unattended. In the East Medication Room, surveyors observed personal items and clothing stored with medication-related supplies, including cups, a tote bag, sweaters, pants, blankets, wheelchair cushions, and leg rest bags. The East first hall and second hall refrigerators each contained two opened vials of Tubersol solution that were not labeled with a date. In the A Hall Medication Cart, surveyors observed opened Nystatin liquid, Latanoprost eye drops, and a Trelegy Ellipta inhaler that were not dated, along with a coffee cup, pastry, sliced red peppers, and a personal cell phone in the cart compartment; an LPN confirmed the items belonged to her. In the C Hall Medication Cart, surveyors observed opened Robitussin cough suppressant, Milk of Magnesia, Miralax powder, and lactulose liquid that were not labeled with a date, and an LPN confirmed the findings.
Failure to Maintain a Qualified Infection Preventionist
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to designate a consistent qualified individual onsite who was responsible for implementing programs and activities to prevent and control infections for one of 10 months, identified as April 2026. The facility’s Infection Control Plan, Program and Committee policy, last reviewed on 1/6/26, stated that the designated Infection Preventionist is responsible for oversight of the infection control program and serves as a consultant to staff on infectious diseases, resident room placement, isolation precautions, staff and resident exposures, and surveillance and epidemiological investigations. During interviews, Human Resource staff stated that the former Infection Preventionist resigned, with the last day of employment on 4/4/26. A Registered Nurse who took over the infection control program stated she assumed the role on 4/4/26, was also supervising the building, looked at records to see if any were reportable, and had not been able to fully do the work since starting, estimating about 12 hours per week. She also stated that her infection control training and certification had been completed long ago and she would need to find it. Review of the facility-provided certification courses showed training completed in 2022, but there was no certificate for completion of the Nursing Home Infection Preventionist Training Course. Nursing Home Administration confirmed the facility failed to designate a consistent qualified individual onsite responsible for infection prevention and control during that month.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release June 24, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
Trusted by long-term care providers and associations.
